WTC Dead 2,752 - US Iraq Dead 2,748

[Laura PourMeADrink]

Enough !!!

[Monkeyman]

1. RIP an K&R

[babylonsister]

2. Enough, but that's not even the point, and never has been. 9/11?

[Laura PourMeADrink]

7. Yes - of course no connection. But, maybe the stupid people

who think there is a connection will stop and pause and say
ok "that's enough" "We're even"

[bluestateguy]

3. Actually I don't think that's a good point

because it only allows the stupid people (and there are a lot of those) to think that there is some kind of slippery connection to 9/11 and Iraq. There is not. The Iraq war is wrong no matter how many are killed.

[lvx35]

4. (recommended) What I want to know is how does it compare to the amount

of time it took to win WWII? How long was the US in WWII from start to finish vs. this war?

[TahitiNut]

10. "Bush killed more Americans than Osama bin Laden"

:shrug:

[Viva_La_Revolution]

5. no. WTC Dead 2,752, Iraq dead - 602,748

Humans are humans, I don't care what country they live in (especially when it's not the country that attacked us in the first place).

[Laura PourMeADrink]

8. I agree 100% It is all sickening and B* iis a mass murderer of

stunning proportions, in my estimation. I was just hoping, that maybe showing the ignorant people who think Iraq is connected to 9-11 will turn and say ok we're even.

[Ian_rd]

9. This is correct. This is the true comparison.

[Strelnikov_]

6. And 9352 Wounded

9352 Wnd: Wounded in Action Not Return to Duty within 72 hours

http://icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx