|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-23-06 11:52 PM Original message |
Pelosi wants to pick Alcee Hastings for Intel char? Are you FUCKING KIDDING ME? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-23-06 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. He's the ranking member |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I thought Jane Harmon was the ranking member |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Ok, the story is, Pelosi wants to remove Harman from the whole cmte |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
18. can she remove both Harman and Hastings from the committee ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That would be best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 02:43 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Any reason she couldn't bring in Dennis Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:59 AM Response to Reply #26 |
42. Sanity? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. I was being slightly facetious about DK- but really, why the hell not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:02 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. You're right, it was a knee jerk laugh. I respect Congressman Kucinich greatly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. So even when we're the majority party, we're going to act out of fear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. OK, I give up. Kucinich for Intel chair, yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Hey, he gets my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. My biggest priority/concern in this thread is, I have to wonder why the M$M is stumping so hard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. Okay, Jack. I don't honestly think Kunich is going to get the job. But lets hear YOUR ideas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Yeah, why put someone who was right about the war from BEFORE it started on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Hey Zhade: Here's Rush Holt on Iraq- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. I support him, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 01:18 AM Response to Reply #55 |
69. Because Kucinich is a fucking idiot when it comes to administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
50. that's funny n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. With 76% of her campaign contributions from weapons manufacturers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 02:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. Thanks for filling me in! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. what specifically do you have against him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
43. from what I've read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
4. effin' crook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
5. For those to whom the truth matters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Impeached AND removed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Then on what charges? This isn't the first time I've seen the TPM link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. From the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Thank you, much appreciated. We mustn't ignore the 16 counts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Well at least I understand the angle now. They say it's all a big setup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
10. I think the real question is, can Harman the hawk do the tough legwork required |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. definitely not Harman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. So what I want to know is, why is the M$M rushing around in terror that she may not get the gig? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. yes bring someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lindisfarne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. A ranking member who has been impeached on charges which make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. If they do this, we're hypocrites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 02:40 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. No, I think something else entirely is going on here, Zhade. And it smells funny to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 04:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. DK? I think I love you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:22 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Yeah, wouldn't that be cool? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. To be fair, Murtha's rep was that he was an earmark king |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. I disagree. I think with the right person in the Intel chair, we could at the very least DEMAND some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
21. So much for the "cleanest Congress in history" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 02:42 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. we're certainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Why don't we wait and see how things shake out before we bring out the tar and feathers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
29. Good to know that the Con's talking points are being repeated on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 04:21 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Yeah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 04:42 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. As long as this isn't just about making sure Harman stays in charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #31 |
46. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
32. Public perception COUNTS. Call Pelosi's office about this! We cannot allow this to stand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
34. It's a great time to clean the mystery out of this mess. It'd be approriate to make the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:31 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Love the phrase "little orts of gossip" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
37. Trying to understand this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:54 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Totally agree with your last three sentences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
58. WTF? Pelosi wants to put in the guy she voted to impeach in the past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
38. Caesar's wife must be above suspicion. I support Rush Holt for chair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:52 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Love that idea! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. That sounds great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
44. You Folks Do Know That The House Vote Was 399-3 Withn John Conyers Heading The Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GymGeekAus (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
51. Harman showed poor judgement via her position and the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigriver (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
61. NO more swiftboating of good dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
64. Harman is better suited and not just in my opinion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Not just in your opinion... in the opinion of Jane Harman's website? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. i have no intention whatsoever, to lay out just whose opinions in every... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 10:11 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Well, the construction of that post made it look like you were offering Harman's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. experience, tenacity, a known rebuker of republican & bush admin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC