Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Juan Cole: "His Shiite executioners danced around his body" & How US has enabled Hussein since 1959

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 01:59 PM
Original message
Juan Cole: "His Shiite executioners danced around his body" & How US has enabled Hussein since 1959
Cole's article for today - "Saddam: The death of a dictator" - addresses how Saddam's capture, trial, conviction, and death sentence has fueled the sectarian violence.

Dec. 30, 2006 | The body of Saddam, as it swung from the gallows at 6 a.m. Saturday Baghdad time, cast an ominous shadow over Iraq. The execution provoked intense questions about whether his trial was fair and about what the fallout will be. One thing is certain: The trial and execution of Saddam were about revenge, not justice. Instead of promoting national reconciliation, this act of revenge helped Saddam portray himself one last time as a symbol of Sunni Arab resistance, and became one more incitement to sectarian warfare.

<snip>

Like everything else in Iraq since 2003, Saddam's trial became entangled in sectarian politics. Iraq is roughly 60 percent Shiite, 18 percent Sunni Arab and 18 percent Kurdish. Elements of the Sunni minority were favored under fellow Sunni Saddam, and during his long, brutal reign this community tended to have high rates of membership in the Baath Party. Although many members of Saddam's own ethnic group deeply disliked him, since the U.S. invasion he has gradually emerged as a symbol of the humiliation that the once-dominant Sunni minority has suffered under a new government dominated by Shiites and Kurds.

Saddam was a symbol of Sunni-Shiite rivalry long before the U.S. occupation. In 1991, while he was in power, he had ferociously suppressed the post-Gulf War Shiite uprising in the south, using helicopter gunships and tanks to kill an estimated 60,000. After the invasion, many Shiites wanted him to be captured, while many Sunnis helped him elude capture. When Saddam was finally caught by U.S. forces in late 2003, Shiites in the Baghdad district of Kadhimiya crossed the bridge over the Tigris to dance and gloat in the neighboring Sunni Arab district of Adhamiya, provoking some clashes. After his capture, students at Mosul University, in Iraq's second-largest and mostly Sunni Arab city, chanted, "Bush, Bush, hear our refrain: We all love Saddam Hussein!" and "We'll die, we'll die, but the nation will live! And America will fall!"

As Iraq spiraled down into a brutal civil war with massive killing and ethnic cleansing, many Iraqis began to yearn for the oppressive security of the Saddam period. After the destruction of the golden dome of the Shiite Askariya mosque in Samarra last February, Iraqis fell into an orgy of sectarian reprisal killings.

By the time of Saddam's trial, sectarian strife was widespread, and the trial simply made it worse. It was not just the inherent bias of a judicial system dominated by his political enemies. Even the crimes for which he was tried were a source of ethnic friction. Saddam Hussein had had many Sunni Arabs killed, and a trial on such a charge could have been politically savvy. Instead, he was accused of the execution of scores of Shiites in Dujail in 1982. This Shiite town had been a hotbed of activism by the Shiite fundamentalist Dawa (Islamic Call) Party, which was founded in the late 1950s and modeled on the Communist Party. In the wake of Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini's 1979 Islamic Revolution in neighboring Iran, Saddam conceived a profound fear of Dawa and similar parties, banning them and making membership a capital crime. Young Dawa leaders such as al-Maliki fled to Tehran, Iran, or Damascus, Syria.

<snip>

Passions did not subside with time. When the death verdict was announced against Saddam in November, Sunni Arabs in Baquba, to the northeast of the capital, staged a big pro-Saddam demonstration. They were attacked by the Shiite police that dominate that mixed city, who killed 20 demonstrators and wounded a similar number. There were also pro-Saddam demonstrations in Fallujah and Mosul. Baghdad had to be put under curfew.

"Saddam: The death of a dictator"

===========================================

Cole's article - For Whom the Bell Tolls: Top Ten Ways the US Enabled Saddam Hussein - is long and well worth reading - I've just excerpted the Top 10 list...

The old monster swung from the gallows this morning at 6 am Baghdad time. His Shiite executioners danced around his body.

1) The first time the US enabled Saddam Hussein came in 1959. In that year, a young Saddam, from the boondock town of Tikrit but living with an uncle in Baghdad, tried to assassinate Qasim. He failed and was wounded in the leg. Saddam had, like many in his generation, joined the Baath Party, which combined socialism, Arab nationalism, and the aspiration for a one-party state.

2) After the failed coup attempt, Saddam fled to Cairo, where he attended law school in between bar brawls, and where it is alleged that he retained his CIA connections there, being put on a stipend by the agency via the Egyptian government. He frequently visited US operatives at the Indiana Cafe. Getting him back on his feet in Cairo was the second episode of US aid to Saddam.

3) In February of 1963 the military wing of the Baath Party, which had infiltrated the officer corps and military academy, made a coup against Qasim, whom they killed. There is evidence from Middle Eastern sources, including interviews conducted at the time by historian Hanna Batatu, that the CIA cooperated in this coup and gave the Baathists lists of Iraqi Communists (who were covert, having infiltrated the government or firms).

4) In 1968, the civilian wing of the Baath Party came to power in a second coup.

5) The second Baath regime in Iraq disappointed the Nixon and Ford administrations by reaching out to the tiny remnants of the Communist Party and by developing good relations with the Soviet Union.

6) When Saddam Hussein invaded Iran in 1980, he again caught the notice of US officials. The US was engaged in an attempt to contain Khomeinism and the new Islamic Republic. Especially after the US faced attacks from radicalized Shiites in Lebanon linked to Iran, and from the Iraqi Da`wa Party, which engaged in terrorism against the US and French embassies in Kuwait, the Reagan administration determined to deal with Saddam from late 1983, giving him important diplomatic encouragement....

7) The US gave practical help to Saddam during the Iran-Iraq War:

8) The Reagan administration worked behind the scenes to foil Iran's motion of censure against Iraq for using chemical weapons.

9) The Reagan administration not only gave significant aid to Saddam, it attempted to recruit other friends for him.

10) After the Gulf War of 1991, when Shiites and Kurds rose up against Saddam Hussein, the Bush senior administration sat back and allowed the Baathists to fly helicopter gunships and to massively repress the uprising.

Cole recommends Eric Blumrich's video "Thanks for the Memories"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you know how hard it is to get a Shiite executioner to dance?
I wonder if it was a slow dance, cheek-to-cheek, or some sort of Riverdance thing. Bumping? Macarena?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. A cross between Texas line dancing and clogging. Heavy on boots and shoes.
Edited on Sat Dec-30-06 02:19 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug: Accompanied by shiite-kicking music.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The C.I.A. put Saddam through law school?
I knew about the other stuff, but hadn't heard that before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If the US began the truth & reconciliation process now with the rest of the world
it would take generations to hear all of the grievances.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, the U.S. is absolutely an accomplice
to Saddam's crimes, but I think Juan Cole's list should make it clear that the claim that Saddam was nothing but a U.S. puppet, is inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Please don't judge Juan Cole by my excerpts...
Cole understands just what a horror Hussein was - as do all who understand the MidEast.

I have a friend who was born and raised in Iraq - has been a US citizen for decades. He was shocked when he visited Egypt in 2004 and found that for the very, very first time it was not acceptable to criticize Hussein. Up until that visit he had always found evidence that the most hated person was Hussein. HATED.

As much as Hussein is to blame for his own choices - and he is - I don't think he could have done nearly as much damage without with support of the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent summation
Thanks for the post IndyOp

Kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. excellent!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Ultimate double-cross! RIP, Saddam.
    ... While the Egyptian government remains silent, the most populous Arab country's Journalists Association condemned today's execution. The increasing gap between the autocratic leaders of Middle East countries and their public threatens to destabilize the region as events such as Saddam's death offer radical forces strong recruiting material. ...

    Libya, where the vast majority of the population adheres to Sunni Islam, canceled all festivities celebrating the Eid al Adha Muslim holiday this weekend, and has ordered all flags to be flown at half-mast on government buildings. ...


http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=absxDfLgPux4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush advisor Pipes... big supporter of military aid to Saddam
http://tomjoad.org/pipes.htm

Daniel Pipes was appointed by President Bush during the Summer Congressional recess in August 2003 (to avoid a problem with Congress, why should Bush's appointments be questioned by anyone?) to the the board of United States Institute of Peace, a Congressionally sponsored think tank dedicated to "the peaceful resolution of international conflicts." He served there until the end of 2004. There is more than a little irony in this. He sees no problem that cannot be solved by militarism. For example, in looking at the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, he has stated that "What war had achieved for Israel," Pipes explained at a Zionist conference in Washington DC, "diplomacy has undone." Nothing short of total military victory will do.

"Conditions of peace have, by and large, been created through military victory"-- Daniel Pipes

So it should really come as no surprise that Pipes, whose hatred of Arab and Muslim people is legendary, would give his backing for military aid to the Iraq regime of Saddam Hussein, back when the Iraqi President was "gassing his own people" (killing Iranians and Kurds). After all, it was a military option. And for Pipes, any military option must be attempted before any alternative is even considered. This is keeping with the Pipes motto of "Give War a Chance!".

So it is in the interest of our understanding of this man, and the thinking of President Bush Jr. and those, like American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the currently misnamed Anti-Defamation League, that support this extremist, that Pipes' article, which appeared in The New Republic on April 27, 1987 is presented.

Back Iraq
It's Time for a U.S. Tilt
by Daniel Pipes and Laurie Mylroie


http://www.tomjoad.org/pipes_supportSaddam.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Please see my post "Bush = Death" for a discussion of positive imaging.
We need to crowd out this Hangman image with our own life-giving and loving imagery. Truly. These Dark Lords are playing mind-games. And there are ways to resist. THEY want a year of more Death and Darkness. What do YOU want? What have YOU seen, what do YOU know, of human goodness and hope, and of the rebirth of American democracy? Form it in your mind. Hold that image fast. Push back!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3034424
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12.  Ramsey Clark knows alot more than he's saying right now!
..............The debate about intelligence failures is itself a cover-up of the obvious. Saddam Hussein was demonized to justify regime change in Iraq. It rendered him an evil madman threatening the civilized world. He possessed weapons of mass destruction. He supported 9/11. He aided al-Qaeda. WMDs could be launched within minutes of his order. That Saddam Hussein would use them was clear. He used them "against his own people." Ignored were the facts that under devastating attacks by the U.S. in 1991 and 2003, Iraq did not use any illegal weapons. In 1991, Iraq was the victim of 88,500 tons of explosives (almost seven Hiroshimas) delivered by the Pentagon in 42 days that destroyed its infrastructure: water systems, power, transportation, communications, manufacturing, commercial properties, housing, mosques, churches, synagogues. Food production, processing, storage, distribution, fertilizer and insecticide production, were targeted for destruction. Nearly 150,000 defenseless people were killed outright in Iraq. The U.S. claimed its casualties to be 156 — 1/3 from friendly fire, the remainder accidents.

http://www.iacenter.org/Iraq/rc-demonize2004.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Clark's "The Fire This Time" is a devastating account of the Gulf War --
and the economic sanctions that followed. The combination of destroyed infrastructure and economic sanctions that prevented Iraq from rebuilding homes, schools, hospitals, agriculture, manufacturing was dirty, dirty work.

"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just and that his justice cannot sleep forever."
Thomas Jefferson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. A must read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC