|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:25 PM Original message |
"him who is??!" Did he just say that? "Him who is the ressurection?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not to mention feminist theology/ inclusive language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. But they'd like to add another 1450 to that 50, no doubt. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. What would have been more inclusive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 09:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Not just Jesus, but God to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. In my church we don't refer to God as male. Ever. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. So you avoid using a pronoun to refer to God at all times? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Yep. God is just God. Granted the word "God" implies masculinity, too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContraBass Black (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. I thought it was a linguistic convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 03:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I remember my first day in Hebrew Bible class (formerly Old Testament) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sounds like Harry Potter speak... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Ewwww...I never thought of that. I guess he was trying to say jesus w/o |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Well, it is a funeral. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yeah, I heard it too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
15. But he said "him" who is. That was the wierd part. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Aw, it's just high faluting religious poetry. You know. If they don't say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Yes, I was watching. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Who said this? Is it from the Ford funeral? If so, trust me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. I'm looking at the grammar: Him who is. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. It's in the Book of Common Prayer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. Probably some old school English from the Middle ages. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. What was the beginning of this sentence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. anything to bust on some xtians, huh? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. That's right. Welcome to DU where there's a war on God going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. i'm an agnostic. i just recognize idiotic intolerance when i see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. You'll recognize plenty of it around here, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's a semi-obsolete construction, but not without precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 09:44 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. I'm pretty sure that in modern structure, we punt and say: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
27. What is the beginning of the sentence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DavidDvorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC