Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some have said MLK was a womanizer. Is that correct?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:56 PM
Original message
Some have said MLK was a womanizer. Is that correct?
Don't bash me, it's something I've heard from various people.


Some also say he was a socialist, but even Christ and the Almighty One would approve of that. For the Almighty One sent Christ, who in turn preached helping one another and being nice to one another. (as far as I understand it to be.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. It seems like this was the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. He never once womanized me
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who cares? It's none of your business
or anybody else's. That was a private matter between himself and his wife. It has nothing to do with his activism and accomplishments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SanFranciscoValues Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree
Does it matter at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. It might have, then
same as with someone who was gay.

Today we shrug but in the 50s and 60s exposure of such private matters would have ruined them and a shrewd operator like J. Edgar would have used such threats of exposure to get them to do what he wanted to.

There were stories that this why Hoover lasted so long under the Kennedy administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
41. About the only one Hoover never threatened was LBJ, who was aptly named
He certainly had a busy Johnson, if the stories are to be believed. Even he was irritated at the Kennedy stories, bragging that he cut a much wider swathe.

Who knows, maybe he had a pic or two of Hoover in a dress...(though to be fair to JEH, that story is said to be fiction). But maybe he had some of the mafia evidence stashed somewhere, who knows?

http://hnn.us/articles/814.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
85. So was JFK. I believe Bill Clinton was/is rather fond of the ladies too!
Isn't it ironic that MLK and JFK gets physically assassinated, BJC gets character assassinated, and yet Mark Foley merely resigns and collects a pension!

It sure seems to me that most 'bad luck' has zeroed in on those opposed to 'right-wing-freak-show' interests, doesn't it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thank you Thank you Thank you!!!!
its like when they talk about clinton and the blow job.. shit i think bush NEEDS a blow job so he would release some of that tension and stop blowing up innocent people!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Public figures are open to scrutiny. It is therefore logical AND reasonable
That they live clean lives or at least prove they recovered from previous mistakes and can move on properly. (the latter is what most people seem to forget.)

It's the same reason I won't trust any politician who blathers on about lifelong marriage when they've had X number of divorces themselves or when they prattle about the lack of morality on tv when they freely contribute to it (Bill O'Reilly lost his right to rant with dignity a long time ago; he's leashed to a network that shows nothing but THE least moral because it's popular and therefore profitable.)

Also, it's kinda hard to promote peace if you're bonking any number of women who might just have husbands who as sure as hell won't feel very peaceful if they found out!! And they, just like the two doing the illicit act -- have a right to know. You're right, it's their lives too.


Yes, technically it's none of anybody's business except MLK's, his wife's, his concubine's, and the concubine's significant other as applicable. Unfortunately our world hasn't worked that way and I don't see it happening any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. He was going to repent but someone shot him in the face.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. How do you know? How does anybody know? And is it wrong to ask?
(apparently so, it is wrong to ask questions - just believe what we are told. Is that it?)

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Thank you
You said--more politely--what I wanted to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. On today of all days!!!
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 04:07 PM by Mandate My Ass
"Oh, don't bash me, but a man who accomplished more for civil rights than most other people combined, and was killed for it, might have had some nookie on the side. Oh my, what a loser!" :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I am repeating what I heard.
What's the goddamn crime in that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. Not a crime.
Just tacky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Tacky is the word. There were 364 other days to ask the question. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Even then....
Yikes, the colossal impropriety of this post should be blatantly obvious to anybody with an ounce of common sense/decency. The man wasn't even elected, he volunteered for a cause that included the ultimate sacrifice. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
64. "I am repeating what I heard."
That's a valid excuse for a 5 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
83. Repeating what you heard is the goddamn crime...
Where did you hear it? Was the source credible? So credible to document it here? By repeating the rumor/gossip/talking point just perpetuates the myth. You're on the internet so try Google and come back with some documentation, make the same claim and we'll debate facts.

Faux News uses "some say" all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Mandate your ass to do what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Mandating that what a person heard automatically means the person BELIEVES it, apparently.
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 04:14 PM by HypnoToad
x( :grr: :mad: ad nauseum

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, from all I have read
it's true. I believe Hoover had audio tape recordings of King in some compromising positions with other women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Yipes.
Now onto a tangent: It also begs to wonder if Hoover has his own fun time listening to the tapes over and over again (not that it's any of my business to ponder)... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Probably.
but then, leadership is an aphrodisiac and in the pre-feminism days, many men took the adoration by women is their rights.

Just like Bill Clinton, they are, were, human and they should be judged by the total of their life.

I'd rather have a leader who is a womanizer, who cheats on his wife, then someone who appears as holier than anyone. YOu know who they end up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Can you get a visual on Holy Joe with a girlfriend???? Ewwwweewww eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. He's on his second wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. "On"? Right now? Really?
Ol' Joe has always seemed like a bottom to me. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. He could have screwn the cheerleader squads of all NFL teams simultaneously for all I care.
That's as important as the color of Gandhi's underwear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
71. ...which were a nice taupe with just a hint of rose
from what I hear. Hand dyed as well as hand woven. Incredibly soft and pliant too. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. The FBI had dirt on him on his extra-marital affairs. And yes, he was a democratic socialist.
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 04:02 PM by Selatius
They used the dirt to try to blackmail him into shutting up or doing what they wanted him to do. It didn't work out, but coincidentally, he was killed by a lone gunman. What a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's the danger in having heroes
and why it is better to honor men and women for heroic acts and not expect perfection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Well said.
It's not about "Who" they do...it's about "WHAT" they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Thank you for a thoughtful response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #25
82. HypnoToad, you should know better than to post something in GD
that is against the normal groupthink! Shame on you for exercising your right to ask a question. You should have used Google and not bothered anyone on this blameless website. Don't you know that it's okay to criticize dead Republicans (Reagan, Ford, etc.), but not okay to criticize dead Democrats or anyone who was liberal? Sheesh! You'd have though you would have learned by now to walk in lock-step!

:sarcasm:

Seriously, GD sucks ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. J. Edgar Hoover certainly thought so
Of course, Hoover was also prone (you should pardon the image) to putting the worst possible gloss on anything when presented with a fact set about someone he didn't care for. If he couldn't hang a charge of womanizing on someone, he usually went with the veiled "homo" reference. If he couldn't put out smears about sexual misconduct, then he'd posit some kind of other moral failing, whether it was drug use, alcohol abuse, or having an overdue library book. So long as it was a smear, Hoover was interested in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Hoover was also prone to wear Women's Clothing.......
Hoover was perhaps the most despicable person to have ever gained a prominent Gov't position in our history.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Ah, the old pinning the nonexisting evidence trick...
So it doesn't matter how perfect or noble a person is, an enemy of that person will attempt to find anything to smear with. But if nothing nasty can be found then something will be concocted anyway? That's low.

And as a more generalized thought, isn't Hoover remembered as a crossdresser? Or should I wait for his birthday so all the Hoover fans to bash me for repeating what I've heard about him because that's none of anybody's business either?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yar Captain! Storm brewing off the Port Bow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Yep. Another peep fest that'd make a Venetian blind.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
42. Quite.
Judging by some of the responses I should have waited at least 2 months. :eyes: Much as there are 'free speech zones', I'm sure I can fathom 'ask questions zones' based on temporal rather than cartographical locations in the near future. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, MLK was a womanizer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:06 PM
Original message
you're baaaaaaad Mr. Toad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. The reason it isn't a matter for speculation is because that pervert Hoover tapped the guy
Tapped his phones, tapped his hotel rooms, got all sorts of audio. RFK had a role in it, too, as he authorized some taps when he was AG (that was more to do with the 'Commie' accusations). Commies were a 'big deal' back then, now they're allies...go figure.

Hey, as far as womanizers, JFK was, too. So was Bill Clinton. Eisenhower. FDR. Thomas Frigging Jefferson...and a host of others. And if you wanna go there, some say Jesus Christ himself wasn't some oddball virginal boy, either, but was a regular married guy.

There's piles of source information on the internet and in libraries. It really isn't germane to his legacy, frankly. It simply illustrates that he, like the rest of us, was human.

If Coretta can forgive, it's not up to us, really....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. wow nominated for WORST TOPIC EVER
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sshan2525 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. Maybe so...
but we all have our flaws and for me, it doesn't detract from his greatness one whit. Those thing are presonal not public concerns, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. If he was, I totally forgive him.
I love MLK!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. and I love Swampy!!!!
:hi:

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Cats and rats living together in peace and harmony!
:hug: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. OMG!!!
It's the end of the world!!!

ARMAGEDDON!!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. What a strange thread topic. "I've heard from various people" Like google doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariellyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. Ditto. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #31
87.  Google can't "prove" it one way or another
It's stories that may or may not be correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #87
89. Yeah, like anyone on DU can prove it one way or another. It's just a dig at MLK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. I never really wondered about it. His public work did not involve his sex life
so it wasn't important to the public. MLK's greatness involved his personal sacrifice, his vision of equality and freedom, and the ultimate achievement of large parts of his goal.

If he had been an advocate against womanizing and then turned out to be a womanizer, it would be a big deal. If he had condemned his opponents for their human failings and secretly had the same failings, he would have been a hypocrite. But as it was, since it had nothing to do with his life's work or his contribution to society, it was irrelevant. He could have been a monk or a Casanova, it wouldn't have mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. So? I hope the night before he was murdered he walked out of a motel saying,
"Wow! If I die tomorrow, that was worth it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. There is hardly an un-castrated male alive
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 04:12 PM by sammythecat
who is not a womanizer to some extent. Most just aren't very good at it. Lack of success is a good inhibitor, and success is encouragement to do it again.

MLK was not a perfect man, but he was a great man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Ha ha ha!!! Good point, there!!!
The ladies don't line up to get next to the ugly, stinky guy with with no money, no style, no ride, no nice home.

The ones who have fame, attention, money, people listening to them and fawning over them, well, those types of folks (male or female, gender isn't the issue) don't have to sleep alone if they don't want to......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
63. Sexist bullshit
Pull something else out of your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. My reply, unlike yours, was not meant
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 05:19 PM by sammythecat
to be insulting.

It's just life as I see it. Give a man the looks of Brad Pitt, the personality and intellect of MLK, and a billion dollars. Such a man will be absolutely bombarded with temptation. I believe he would at some time, if not many times, succumb. It would have nothing at all to do with love. Only momentary lust. That's why they call it a sex "drive". It's almost irresistible in the right situation.

Please don't bring up anecdotal evidence to the contrary. I'm talking about a random guy. Give him these gifts. How much money would you wager that he would never have a dalliance in his life?

on edit: I'm not pleased with this assessment, it's just the way I think it likely is. And it does not detract, in the slightest, from my estimation of Martin Luther King. I have nothing but total admiration for him. I think he is one of the greatest in history. A truly great human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. it's classic right wing double standard...
the cross-dressing, living w/ male companion FBI director Hoover was listening in on King and the Kennedy's bedroom behavior...to this day they use private failures to distract from the public service of people on the left...if they can get you talking about who he was f**king, you will forget about the causes he championed...it still works...we just about have to have Jesus walking on the water to avoid this trap, and when we do have leaders who are damn near perfect in private as well as public, the RW machine just make the sh*t up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
47. Don't bash me, I just like to post stupid shit.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. Bwhahaha!
That's my first laugh of the day. :-)

I've alerted on that stupid piece of shite.

And now I'm off to add an attention whore to my ignore list....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
48. This shite at Top of Page on my first visit to GD on MLK Day. GOODBYE HYPNOTOAD.
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. I think Ralph Abernathy wrote a book, and made those charges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
52. MLK wasn't perfect, but he was a good man.......
Even good people have their weaknesses and faults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. yup
Even Gandhi was, it was reported, an imperfect father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
53. What does that have to do with what we are celebrating his life for?
maybe he was, so were many great men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
54. Gee, I'm sorry that his personal life didn't meet up to your exacting standards.
I've alerted on this ridiculous post right now.

Yes, Nobel Peace Prize winning Dr. Martin Luther King, the man who personified the Civil Rights Movement in this country, who championed civil rights and helped to try to eliminate discrimination and bigotry and tried to deal with the horrible repercussions of racism, yes, he did engage in extra maritial affairs. And...so fucking what? This kind of purient crap was indulged in by then FBI director J. Edgar Hoover.

On this day, posting something nauseating like this is contempable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3121guitarist Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
57. His greatness forshadows any pecadillos.
Shameful to even bring this up now. Hopefully he was a socialist. If you read the Gospels, it is apparant that it is a treatese for socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
60. A prodigious one
according to many accounts. let it not be said that he and Gingrinch had nothing in common.

But so what? He didn't moralize to others the way Repukes do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
61. any particular reason you chose to start this thread today?
lame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
62. Yes
really great people engage themselves with others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
65. So was Eleanor Roosevelt, Marlene Dietrich and Frida Kahlo.
Didn't seem to affect their greatness either.

Just sayin'.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
66. Yes, He Was A Womanizer.
But in my opinion, and hopefully yours as well, that no where near reason enough to think less of him in any significant way. It merely means he had his flaws as each of us have our own. In his case, however, he had strengths that far outweigh the flaws, and far outweigh what many of us will attain ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
67. Google "Martin Luther King" and "womanizer" and look at all the right-wing sewage that comes up....
Maybe he was, and maybe he wasn't; it's none of my business. I do know that the "womanizer" charge is something the far-right-wing loves to bring up when they denigrate one of the greatest Americans in all of history.

His profound legacy certainly lies elswhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USA_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
69. Reagan Was Divorced ...
... and that makes him an adulterer according to the Bible. Nobody is free of 'sin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. nobody brings up that Nancy was pregnant when she and Ronnie married
either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
70. And Your point IS????????
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
73. Who cares? Someone killed him.
Besides, the only people who bring this crap up on MLK day are those who despise King. All you have to do is go over to FR on this day to see the filth they write about him.

It happens every year.

JFK was a womanizer too, in case you were wondering. I know there's no holiday for his birthday, so you can bring this up on May 29th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
74. So what
By now your question has been answered, but why should this matter. He didn't go around telling others how to behave within their marriages. Instead, he gave us all an amazing gift that transformed our nation. As long as the women concented, and there are no reports they didn't, it is all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
75. I don't know and I don't care. Its none of my business. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
76. Who cares? Not me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
77. "some say". So what? I bet he ate pickles also.
As if either have anything to do with anything that was special about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. Hey, let's not say things we can't take back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #77
79. hey
that's none of our business

its strictly between him and pickles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
81. What if he was?
Why do you care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Fourmi_Rouge Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
84. Kicking this thread!!!!!!!!
So the rest of DU and the general public can get a good noseful of this festering pustule of an OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
86.  I have heard that many , many times
Of course, I can't prove it

(just like JFK)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulum_Moon Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. NOOOOOOOOO! HEEEEEE! DID NOT!!!!!!!!!!!
And I hope this gert's in before his day ends. On the wet coast anyway! LOVE YOU MLK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC