Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Geothermal pump gives free heat "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:28 AM
Original message
"Geothermal pump gives free heat "
Free heat from a geothermal heat pump warms my kitchen as I write this commentary. For every dollar of electrical energy that goes into the heat pump, I get 3.6 dollars of electrical heat. That's 2.6 dollars of free heat. And by purchasing clean green power from hydroelectric dams and wind power, it's possible to heat one's home without burning oil and without generating global warming gases.

The idea of installing a geothermal heat pump began in 2004 when I read about how the polar ice caps are melting at a record pace and how atmospheric carbon dioxide was at record levels and increasing dramatically. The possibility of peak oil production occurring in this decade accompanied by increasing demand for oil in China has made oil prices skyrocket.

I watched as President Bush set up a string of permanent military bases in the oil producing regions of Iraq. I watched as our own Maine National Reserve troops were sent to oil-rich Iraq with the false goals of fighting terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. I watched as oil companies made obscene profits while people suffered. Something had to be done. The freedom we should be fighting for today is freedom from Middle East oil.

So, how does one economically heat one's home without oil and without pollution? Natural gas is a clean-burning fuel but it still increases carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Solar is good, but there just isn't much sunlight available in January in Maine when we need the most heat. Geothermal heating coupled with green power produced from hydroelectric, wind and solar power met the requirements.

http://bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=128739
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. A friend of mine heats his house (in N.E.) with partial geothermal
combined with solar, then wood, with oil as a backup on the worst New England days, or when there has been an extended sunless period. It works very nicely...his house is always toasty warm, even though his very large living room has a three-story high ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I wish so badly I could afford some land so I could build a place like his
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. The guy has a fascinating history...he was blacklisted by McCarthy
He's in his mid-sixties. Fresh out of school with a degree in industrial design, he found he couldn't get a job anywhere. He had registered as a CO, protesting the war. He only found out several years late when he was essentially forced to abandon his career choice and began using his ID skills to build art metal staircases, gates, even homes. He moved to CT from Chicago my closing his eyes and sticking a pin in a map.

First thing he did was buy some cheap land in the then-unihabited Northeast Corner of CT (they still call it "The Quiet Corner), land which had an old farm house on it. He rehabbed it by himself, but it burned to the ground one day shortly after he finished. With nothing left but the old 1700's stone foundation and a few salvagable timbers, he began rebuilding. Instead of using the old stone-line basement as a basement, he sealed all the stone work and made it the living room, with the dining/kitchen/sleeping levels up one story on a mezzanine, and his office and another bedroom way up on what used to be the second floor, now the third floor, with balconies overlooking the three-story open space. With very little money, he had to use salvage materials from the fire, and wood from his land. There is a two-story spiral staircase made out of split logs. His fireplace and bathtub are actually old harbor bouys cut in half. He mixed a resin compound in his studio and poured funky textured floors. The entire back of the house was later updated with three-story-high windows made from the glass which had to removed from Boston's John Hancock tower, purchased as salvage. During construction, he used three 30' trees to hold up the roof while he was working...he liked them so much, he just stripped the bark and shellacked them. All three trees still stand in his livingroom/dining room, holding up the main roof beam.

But by far the coolest part...the entire house is now set slightly into the hillside. Three stories open in the back, but the front entrance is at ground-level, and is a giant circular "stone" slab (another resin compound) which you roll to the side to enter the house. The front looks just like a hobbit house with the round door. It is freakin' awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. He may have been blacklisted
But the red Scare ended in the mid-50s. Murrow had his show about McCarthy in 1954.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Correct. He is in his mid-sixties.
Not sure what you're saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. If he's 65, he would have been 13 in 1954
Why would he have been blacklisted as a child?? What did he do to GET blacklisted:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I obviously need to check up on the facts behind this one!
I'll certainly check with him next time I see him. I know he's told me the story a couple of times, and I didn't question its veracity, because I've known the guy for years, and trust him implicitely. The timeline would seem to indicate his CO status was during Vietnam. Maybe his blacklisting wasn't "McCarthy" related. When he told me the story first, about five years ago, it made sense. I haven't talked to him about it since, so I might not be telling it as he told me. I'll check it out now, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. I could go for a hobbit house :^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was nice knowing you - enjoy your cell in gitmo
Because damnit, we can't have freethinkers thinking outside of the box when it comes to provide clean energy for your home.

I'm house shopping and that might be something I'll keep in mind when fixing up my new place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. where's the rest of the article?
there wasn't any more detail other than he installed it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I dunno... Bet you could email him via the UMaine site if you have ?s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. What does a geothermal heat pump look like?
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 10:39 AM by Selatius
There are no pictures, just this brief description:

"To extract heat from the ground, one must bury a large amount of pipe in the ground. Still geothermal heating is a well-established technology. Ninety-five percent of new homes in Sweden have installed geothermal heating. Five hundred thousand units have been installed in Canada and the United States."

How large or how small is it? Does it require me to rip up my foundation? Or can I bury it in my front/backyard? Regardless, this should be encouraged by the federal government. A program should be set up to teach people how to install these devices if it is relatively easy to do so. Carter wanted something similar with installing solar panels on the roofs of homes. He had one installed on the White House--I heard--but Reagan, so the story goes, tore it down as the first order of business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not sure but I bet we could find out via google
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Here ya go
A link to the Geothermal Heat Pump Consortium - illustrations page. Pics of how it works in both residential and commercial and how it looks. I clicked the .jpegs rather than the .eps links. There are links on the homepage about incentives by state and other information.

http://www.geoexchange.org/illustrations/graphics.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Cool, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keith the dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. I'm an HVAC engineer
It looks not much different than the air handling unit in your house, just a slightly bigger box for the compressor and the heat exchanger/condenser. The expensive part is the well or pipe loop that must be installed in the ground.

The geothermal heat pump collects the heat that the ground absorbs from the sun, so essentially it is a form of solar heat. The problem with the solar collectors installed outside in the sun is that they only collect when the sun is out and the deleterious effect of the sun's rays give the collectors a short life. (I often wonder if many collectors collected enough energy to cover the energy used to make them.) The heat pump collects the low grade heat stored in the earth and converts it to usable heat with a little electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Any idea on cost for system and installation?
I've done some earlier reading on geothermal systems and am convinced that it's the best option for me.

None of my reading, though, has been helpful in getting a ballpark figure.

1800sf ranch with large yard.

Help please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. $10-20K Canadian -- link to good sources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keith the dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Not Cheap
Large part of the cost is the labor needed for the well or loop piping. The equipment is not otherwise too much different than a good efficient Air to air system. But there is substantial savings on both the heating and cooling side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
53. I considered it for our new house
The HVAC guy said it'd take (I'm doing this from memory) a loop of 1000 lf of pipe buried 4' deep with 4' of separation. That's an area 250'l x 16'w.

For me, an efficient air-source heat pump backed up with a woodstove is a better investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. a friend installed this in their new house...
probably aprox. 2200 sq ft.

(i might be wrong on somee details, but you will get the idea)

what the system consisted of:

4 holes bored 260 ft deep in his back yard, each 3-6 inches in dia. (i didnt seee thee holes, he described theem with his hands)

each hole then had a loop of flexible pipe lowered in it, theen the hole was filled with sand.

water flows thru the pipes in each hole. the other end of the pipes is connected to a heat exchanger in the attic. the ground stays at a steady 60 deg. F, heating or cooling the water, depending on the season.

the house has a "heat pump" installed, which may seem underpowered, but since you are not exchanging heat with -20 deg air or +100 deg air, but rather with 60 degree water, it is very adequate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. My neighbor has geothermal heating
What he did was to bury the pipes on the west side of the hill, down from his house. I don't think he had any buried directly beneath his house except for the pipes that brought the heat into the building. It's been a while since I've been to his place, but I think he uses a sort of natural cycling to move the heat around. He has a small wood burning stove for heating water and for the coldest days.

What's neat is that the geothermal stuff also works to cool the house in the summer. It's built in a field, away from all but one small tree, but it stays cool without having to use AC or fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good stuff, geothermal,
But I will be sticking with an external woodstove, equipped with a catalytic convertor. It will provide 100% of my heating needs, and can also be used to replace whichever energy source you are using in your hot water heater. It is low polluting, and I will be able to get all the wood I need for the next twenty years at least from my own eight acres of forest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How often do you have to feed it? Do you have to wade through snowdrifts
in the middle of the night or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well, with global warming and what have you
We've had very few snowdrifts here in Mid Mo the past few years. But you can set the stove up such that it is protected from a lot of the elements and such. And most external woodstoves only have to be fed every twelve hours. Depending on the size of the fire box, you can feed in logs that are 3-5 ft. in length.

And generally it takes between one and a half to three cords of wood to heat a normal house throughout the winter. With a catalytic convertor, this will be less, for not only does the CC filter out a lot of the smoke, it also catches a lot of the heat going up the chimney and redistributes it back to the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. You don't do anything. The heat is always there.
When you dig footings for a new home, you have to go down x-number of feet because past four feet or so, the earth never freezes. Go down far enough and it's actually relatively warm, all the time, unaffected by the outside air temps no matter how cold it gets. The idea is to just draw this warm air up from the ground. You don't do anything else. However, I believe it works best as an adjunct heat source. The air isn't actually "warm," but it is way warmer than the outside air in the winter. Like in the upper fifties, I think. From 58 degrees, it is pretty easy/cheap to heat your space up to more comfortable temperature using another heat source like solar or wood.

I am not an engineer. Any engineers reading, feel free to correct my errors here. But I think I'm pretty close on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. If it works in Sweden, it should be a great way to reduce fuel use in ME
A self-contained system would make sense in a lot of rural Northern areas.

Living in a temperate climate I should be able to use solar for 80-90% of my electrical and heating needs, but even with rebates and tax benefits the payback window is over ten years and the upfront cost would involve getting a home equity loan. Compare that to the payback for installing an energy-efficient furnace and A/C system and it just made no sense. I keep waiting for the payback period to come down to about five years, then it's worth considering.

We do have energy policies that are backward in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. Um. Sorry That's Not Free Heat
His own numbers indicate that he gets $3.60 in heat for a dollar. While that's a terrific discount, it's not free. HE'S PAYING A DOLLAR FOR $3.60 IN HEAT! So, he gets his heat for 27.77% of the cost, but that's not free!

You'd think someone this clever would be better with numbers.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keith the dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. Beg to differ
With a heat pump, you are using a little electricity (not free) to mine free btu's from the earth which come free from the sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Sorry But The Story Contradicts Your Contention
The writer says he pays $1 to get $3.60 of heat. Therefore, the heat COSTS $1. It's a great bargain to be sure, and good for the guy who wrote the piece for being clever enough to do this in his house, but if you pay anything for anything it is, by definition, not free.

If he had a different form of heat, then the GT pump would not be running. He would get no heat from it at all, but it would cost zero. When he turns it on, he's paying to run it. That is the source of the heat. Therefore, the cost of operate the pump is the cost of the heat. IF something has a cost, it isn't free.

I'm not criticizing the guy for doing it, for goodness sake. But he's paying money to get the heat. It's impossible to call that free!

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keith the dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. I see your point
It's like those offers where you get something "free" but have to pay for the shipping. I never consider that free. On a GT heat pump, you basically have to pay for the shipping, but the heat is free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. That;s a good way to look at it :^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. Using corn myself this year
Not sure of the pollution effect. I think it's less than gas. 1st level of heat = corn. 2nd level = wood. 3rd level = natural gas.
So far it looks like our $ output for the winter will be less than $450. Thank God for global warming. <sarcasm>.
I don't believe a person could run geothermal in a city what with water lines and sewer lines etc. underground, could they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Corn is mostly "green"
Excepting the fuel used to grow and transport it. Burning corn as a solid fuel is much more efficient than burning corn-derived alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why aren't geothermal and solar required for new builds now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Cuz the same ol people run things
and they like sending out big heating bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. He who has money, has politicians.
That's the unfortunate nature of our election system where corporate special interest money is considered free speech as per SCOTUS ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Dang, I like the way you turn a phrase. I'm gonna steal that. :^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
27. We use...
...a regular electric "air" heat pump on our new house. It is not geothermal but the cost savings over an electric heater are dramatic. As long as the outside temperature stays above about 40 degrees, the electric heater is not used at all.

The house stays as warm as we want it, but we usually set our thermostat at 66 to 67 degrees.

We love it. Remember, in summer the heat pump serves as your air conditioning as well.

The most important thing you can do to keep energy use down is to super-insulate your house. It has the most payoff for the least investment. In many areas, the government or power companies have programs to help offset the costs.

Our total power bill in the dead of winter was about $75.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
28. Crawford ranch uses geothermal
Hate to rain on your parade but it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. its a shame
that people have to talk about, or use alternative heating methods for their homes.we should be provided affordable heating by our utility companies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. yes -- and why isn't Bush making it easier for others to get one?
We aren't all millionaires from wealthy families (who also made a big profit from a stadium deal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Because his buddies who make a profit off of us not going green come first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. That's great news! I can't wait to haul that out in a debate
The Texas oilman has so little faith in that commodity that he had his pig farm outfitted with a green energy source. B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. The technology makes sense
If one can afford the up-front cost it is the smart way to go, cost-wise. If you have seen me around here there are many parts of the enviromental movement with whom I disagree. This goes includes for the alternative-energy crowd because I think many of them do not understand how much power a first world country requires. Any enviromental benefit is a plus. (I for one welcome global warming. It will only expand the golf season.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Oh I'm not arguing against it. I just find it amusing that Mr. Oil has it.
The problem I have with most alternative energy systems is that they remain expensive as long as there's little demand. I could take my house off grid for 80% of current electric needs with solar or geothermal but the payback window would be ridiculously long because I don't use much electricity now. I run the numbers, and it never makes sense. I wish it did. Perhaps if we installed a pool or some other energy hogs like teenagers it would make the numbers work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
33. A similar system is used by the City of Toronto...
for summertime cooling. It uses cold, deep lake water, instead of warm, deep earth, but the idea is the same.

http://www.toronto.ca/water/deep_lake/

Sid

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
36. Here's a 100% solar home in Maine
http://www.solarhouse.com/

It cost $300k to build - 15% of the total cost went into the solar thermal and electric systems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. That's one of my fave links. :^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. Do you know where the house is?
I'm guessing around Portland somewhere. 300K is not that high now for Cumberland county but for that sort of money in most of Maine eleven years ago you could build a real mansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. Yeah it's down that way. I have not been there, though. $300K was the
going price for a 70s modular ranch on 2 scrubby acres near a swamp not long ago. *sigh* The only places I see affordable houses are up in the County and way downeast, but that's only because their economies have collapsed so their $86,000 house feels like a $300K one anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. Is this the same as a ground source heat pump? I'm confused.
they are very efficient when compared to air-air heat pumps, and do give free hot water in the summer. But a ground source heat pump uses energy, does not create it. Isn't thsi different from 'geothermal' which to me implies hot springs being tapped or chunks of molten lava.

Our local university serves as the home for the national ground source heat pump industry, for more information go to: http://www.igshpa.okstate.edu/

But again, these things run off electricity, its just that they are more efficient because the interface is air to water, with the water being a constant temp, about 57 degress I believe. They can use large fields or drill straight down, but regardless need hundreds of feet of tubing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
47. Hyrdroelectic is not "Green Power"
A major study revealed that Hydro contributes to global warming. Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
50. If geothermal is widely adopted
doesn't it have the potential to disrupt ground temperatures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. No, but it does have the potential to disrupt Energy Company profits
so look for the coming Lieberman - Spectre Act outlawing the use of "communistic" energy sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
51. Why do you hate America? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. *lol*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC