Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAUX: Intelligence Summit Saddam tapes prove Saddam had wmd! NOT true!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:30 AM
Original message
FAUX: Intelligence Summit Saddam tapes prove Saddam had wmd! NOT true!
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 08:31 AM by Wordie
But even the Bush admin says that's not what's on the tapes! Since Ledeen and Perle were part of the Intelligence Summit 2006 conference, it appears to me that this is just another attempt to deceive the public. On the tapes, Saddam is even heard to say, "Terrorism is coming. I told the Americans a long time before August 2 and I told the British as well, I think..." "I told them that in the future there will be terrorism with weapons of mass destruction."

This is only going to reinforce the idea among freepers and other members of Bush's base that the Iraq War was justified. :grr:

Here's what the Bush admin says about the tapes:
A U.S. official said the tapes "do not change the story" on Saddam's weapons programs in any substantive way.

"We already knew he had them in the early '90s and wanted to get them again after he lost them but was not able to," the official said.

A spokeswoman for Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte said the tapes were "fascinating," but they "do not reveal anything that changes their postwar analysis of Iraq's weapons programs, nor do they change the findings contained in the comprehensive Iraq Survey Group report."

The Survey Group report, written by Charles Duelfer and published in October 2004, concluded that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction when the United States invaded in March of 2003, but the regime intended to resume its WMD programs once U.N. sanctions were lifted.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/18/hussein.tapes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who
is lying now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Welcome to DU, ChazII! It appears that neocons are involved...
:hi:

Richard Perle and Michael Ledeen (both notorious neocons) were speakers at the Intelligence Summit 2006, which revealed the tapes.

Here's more from the article about the conference's sponsor:
The International Intelligence Summit describes itself on its Web site as a nonpartisan, nonprofit forum that promotes an exchange of ideas among members of the international intelligence community.

The summit's main sponsor is the Michael Cherney Fund, whose Web site describes the fund's main objective as "helping realize the intellectual potential of the post-Soviet emigres to Israel."

The summit Web site states that the group supports the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, which have prompted widespread violence across the globe.

"In solidarity with the people of Denmark and in support of freedom of speech, the Intelligence Summit offers free conference admission to Danish passport holders," it states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank you
for both the welcome and the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Tapes taken from FBI...translation center (isn't that called "stealing"?)
House Intelligence Committee chairman Pete Hoekstra is reviewing transcripts to determine if U.S. officials missed WMD evidence after the war. But intel agencies are skeptical. The tapes were taken without permission from an FBI-run translation center, officials say, and are years old. Two government officials, requesting anonymity because of the sensitive subject, say the tapes in no way prove that WMD stockpiles or programs existed at the time of the U.S. invasion or were moved to another country before U.S. troops arrived.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11299205/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. FAIR has issued an Action Alert...contact ABC news re: misleading info.
Action Alert

Missing From ABC's WMD 'Scoop'
Star defector Hussein Kamel said weapons were destroyed


2/17/06

On February 15, ABC investigative reporter Brian Ross delivered an exclusive report on World News Tonight and Nightline that purported to be a bombshell. ABC had obtained tape-recorded conversations from mid-1995 that seemed to show that Iraq had been concealing its weapons of mass destruction program. The tapes, according to Ross, "will only serve to fuel the continuing debate about Saddam's true intentions and whether he, in fact, did hide weapons of mass destruction." But ABC viewers were left in the dark about information that would undermine the tape's most important revelations.

ABC emphasized the excerpts of a conversation between Saddam Hussein and his weapons chief (and son-in-law) Hussein Kamel that seem to bolster the idea that Iraq was hiding weapons from inspectors. As Ross reported on Nightline, "Saddam's son-in-law briefs Saddam on the Iraqi campaign of deceit aimed at fooling UN inspectors." Kamel is then heard telling Saddam Hussein, in ABC's translation: "We did not reveal all that we have. Not the type of weapons. Not the volume of the materials we imported. Not the volume of the production we told them about. Not the volume of news. None of this was correct."

ABC provides little context for the exchange, but suggests that these admissions might provide new insight into the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq a decade later. In fact, what Kamel revealed about the extent of Iraq's weapons programs has been known for some time, and portions of his account were an integral part of the White House's case for war.

Kamel defected from Iraq in 1995, and talked at great length with U.N. weapons inspectors and the CIA about Iraq's unconventional weapons programs. He revealed at that time that Iraq's chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs had been more advanced than the Saddam Hussein regime had admitted to the inspectors. Kamel publicly revealed the concealment of WMD-related activities in an interview with CNN (9/21/95): "The order was to hide much of it from the start, and we hid a lot of that information. These were not individual acts of concealment, but were as a result of direct orders from the top." So the fact that Saddam Hussein was attempting to deceive the weapons inspectors, as in ABC's tape, is hardly news more than 10 years later.

But ABC's story does not include what was arguably Kamel's more important revelation, which was that Iraq had destroyed its stocks of usable unconventional weapons. "Iraq does not possess any weapons of mass destruction," he told CNN in 1995. He told the same story to U.N. and U.S. officials, saying that by destroying the weapons in the summer of 1991, Saddam Hussein hoped to conceal how far Iraq had gotten in developing weapons, with the intent of restarting these programs after the inspection regime was ended.

Hussein Kamel was lured back to Iraq in 1996, where he was almost immediately killed by Saddam Hussein's forces. But when the Bush administration began gearing up for war with Iraq in 2002, it found that selective citation of Kamel's testimony could be very helpful in making its case. Vice President Dick Cheney asserted in an August 2002 speech (8/26/02) that the Iraqi regime had been "very busy enhancing its capabilities in the field of chemical and biological agents," and continued "to pursue the nuclear program they began many years ago." To back this up these claims, Cheney added, "We've gotten this from the firsthand testimony of defectors, including Saddam's own son-in-law"—a reference to Kamel.

In a Chicago Tribune op-ed (9/10/02), former head of the U.N. weapons inspection team Scott Ritter pointed out that Cheney had left out a critical part of Kamel’s story:

Throughout his interview with UNSCOM, a U.N. special commission, Hussein Kamel reiterated his main point—that nothing was left. "All chemical weapons were destroyed," he said. "I ordered destruction of all chemical weapons. All weapons—biological, chemical, missile, nuclear—were destroyed."


Nevertheless, the administration continued to selectively use Kamel's disclosures to bolster its case that Iraq had hidden stockpiles of banned weapons. "It took years for Iraq to finally admit that it had produced four tons of the deadly nerve agent, VX," then-Secretary of State Colin Powell said in his February 5, 2003 speech to the U.N. "The admission only came out after inspectors collected documentation as a result of the defection of Hussein Kamel, Saddam Hussein's late son-in-law." Powell did not note that Kamel had also reported that this nerve gas, along with all other such weapons, had been destroyed years earlier (Extra!, 5-6/03).

Shortly before the invasion of Iraq began, Newsweek (3/3/03) obtained the transcript of Kamel's 1995 debriefing by officials from UNSCOM, the U.N. inspections team, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It published Kamel's key statement from that transcript: "All weapons—biological, chemical, missile, nuclear—were destroyed." Newsweek reported that Kamel told the same story to the CIA, but his account had been "hushed up." Shortly thereafter, the complete transcript of Kamel's discussions with inspectors was made public by Cambridge University's Glen Rangwala.

As FAIR noted shortly after the Newsweek report (FAIR Media Advisory, 2/27/03), this crucial information went largely unreported in the mainstream media. Three years later, that is still the case. Instead of this critical context—which frankly undermines the importance of the network's "exclusive"—ABC opted for political speculation. The network's report quotes Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.): "From reading some of the transcripts, you would think that it's pretty likely that there were WMD that were hidden or that were moved out of the country." By omitting countervailing information, ABC is in effect bolstering such ill-informed claims.

Nightline anchor Terry Moran asserted that the tapes ABC aired made an important contribution to our understanding of the Iraq controversy: "Without question, these tapes will shed new light on the debate over the war and on Saddam's future." If ABC's report is any indication, that debate will continue to ignore inconvenient facts about what was really known before the war about Iraq's weapons.

ACTION: Contact ABC and ask why its reports citing an Iraqi official to bolster the idea that Iraq had WMDs failed to mention that the same official told weapons inspectors that Iraq's weapons stockpiles were destroyed in 1991.

CONTACT:
ABC World News Tonight
Phone: 212-456-4040
netaudr@abc.com

ABC Nightline
Phone: 202-222-7000
nightline@abc.com


http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2825

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Problems reported w/ World News Tonight email address, alternative here:
http://abc.go.com/site/contactus.html?cat=World%20News%20Tonight

The above is their webform, through which comments can be sent. They may have recently switched to the webform means of contacting the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick for afternoon crowd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. You left out the best part.
On one of the clips I saw, Saddam wrapped up his "terrorism is coming to America" comments with "But not from Iraq".

I believe there was some talk of trying to warn us (or at least warn someone) as well.

The other clip I saw was them talking about waiting out the sanctions and then restarting their weapons program. To me, this means the sanctions were working, but it doesn't take a genius to see how that's going to be spun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right! I actually heard one reporter comment that Saddam
was trying to WARN the US because he knew that he would be blamed for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. For a bad dictator...
He tries his hardest to warn us about terrorism. Too bad the Bush and his a-hole family and administration didn't listen to him because (in W's twisted mind) he "tried to kill my daddy." I hate Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Add'l info: Intel summit overshadowed by fund concern (unlawful activity)
Intel summit overshadowed by fund concern (unlawful activity)
By Shaun Waterman Feb 18, 2006, 20:02 GMT

WASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- U.S. intelligence officials are being warned about attending a conference this weekend where organizers plan to release audio tapes of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein discussing his illegal weapons programs -- because of concerns about one of the event`s underwriters.

...questions about one of the conference`s sponsors, Russian-Israeli millionaire Michael Cherney -- denied a visa to the United States because of what the State Department said was concern about 'unlawful activity' -- were raised with the National Counterintelligence Executive earlier this year.

A State Department official confirmed that Cherney had been denied a U.S. visa in August 2003, under Section 212 of the Immigration and National Act, which bars entry to 'Any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in... any ... unlawful activity.'



The two former CIA directors on the event`s advisory board who withdrew from the event were R. James Woolsey and John Deutch.

'I got new information this week about the funder from someone I know and whose judgment on these matters I trust,' he (Woolsey) said in a statement provided to UPI. 'Based on that information I decided to withdraw. If Loftus is saying that anyone pressured me about this issue he is quite wrong.'


http://news.monstersandcritics.com/northamerica/article_1131094.php/Intel_summit_overshadowed_by_fund_concern

The article also seems to say that the above two have withdrawn from the Intelligence Summit's board of directors, but it isn't completely clear if that was the case, or if it might have meant a withdrawal from the conference itself only.

John Loftus, former DOJ prosecuter and the event organizer, who is said on his website to "...know more intelligence secrets than anyone alive," claimed that exhibitors, attendees and speakers were pulling out because of pressure from Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte`s office.

So, does this seem really quite strange to anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. They do this shit all the time...
They plant a story and let it germinate for a couple of weeks, then declare that it is not true.... But but then, most people have heard and believe the first story. How many times have they done this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. ...and I seem to remember a certain SOTU. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC