Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some Marines Declining Extra Body Armor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:53 PM
Original message
Some Marines Declining Extra Body Armor
Extra body armor — the lack of which caused a political storm in the United States — has flooded in to
Iraq, but many Marines here promptly stuck it in lockers or under bunks. Too heavy and cumbersome, many say.
Marines already carry loads as heavy as 70 pounds when they patrol the dangerous streets in towns and villages in restive Anbar province. The new armor plates, while only about five pounds per set, are not worth carrying for the additional safety they are said to provide, some say.

"We have to climb over walls and go through windows," said Sgt. Justin Shank of Greencastle, Pa. "I understand the more armor, the safer you are. But it makes you slower. People don't understand that this is combat and people are going to die." Staff Sgt. Thomas Bain of Buffalo, N.Y., shared concerns about the extra pounds.

"Before you know it, they're going to get us injured because we're hauling too much weight and don't have enough mobility to maneuver in a fight from house to house," said Bain, who is assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment. "I think we're starting to go overboard on the armor."

Since the insurgency erupted in Iraq, the Pentagon has been criticized for supplying insufficient armor for Humvees and too few bulletproof vests. In one remarkable incident, soldiers publicly confronted Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld about the problem on live television. Hometown groups across the United States have since raised money to send extra armor to troops, and the Pentagon, under congressional pressure, launched a program last October to reimburse troops who had purchased armor with their own money.

more
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060326/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_unused_armor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this the 'good news' story of the day? I wonder if anyone,
like NASA, has considered developing lighter armor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. something smells fishy about this story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed. Setup for the "We gave them armor, they don't want it" line?
I smell a rat too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, how about armor for vehicles?
What, does that weigh them down too, and diminish their fuel efficiency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does anyone else remember "dragon skin" armour..
or some such name. It was preferred because it was lighter & flexible as well as effective? IIRC, soldiers were not being allowed to wear it even if it had been purchased for them privately.. Does anyone else remember this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, I do remember this story......
It made the rounds in November, I think. The story goes that Generals were telling the soldiers that their families could be denied payment of the soldier's life insurance if they were killed while wearing the unauthorized "Dragon-Skin" armour.....even though it was judged to be more effective thatn the armour the military currently purchases.

Also, the guy that owns the company from which the military purchases their armour, the same company that was having problems producing enough armour for the military's deployment needs, was reported to have given his daughter a multi-million dollar birthday party.

I'll check Google for the name of this schmuck and his company!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. David H. Brooks, CEO of bulletproof vest maker DHB Industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thanks, Kingshakabobo..........
I was having a helluva time Googling for this info.

But I did find out that LOTS of people get multi-million dollar birthday parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. All I could remember was "Defense contractor debutante" and it worked LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Plate armor is very combersom
but that's just plate armor. Doesn't mention any other armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC