Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do the right wing fundies suddenly not believe in the separation...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:10 PM
Original message
Why do the right wing fundies suddenly not believe in the separation...
...of church and state? That has never been challenged in the entire history of the US. So WTF is up with them? Could it be this:

"Religious expression. Conservative evangelicals want churches to be able to support political candidates without jeopardizing their tax-exempt status, teacher-led prayer to be allowed in schools, and religious symbols such as the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public places."

Link

They oh, so subtly, want to establish religion in the US, and it ain't YOUR or MY religion, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Prayers led by teachers were allowed in public schools
for most of US history, and right-wingers have been trying to get them back in public schools since the Supreme Court banned that.

I'm a member of "Americans United for Separation of Church and State," but this isn't new.
www.au.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's why the church tax-exempt status is going to have
to be reviewed when the Dems take Congress back...the abuses started with the * cabal establishing the faith based initive....it crossed the line and opened the door the abuses we are seeing now....what these churches have effectively done is ruined it for the other churches that aren't involved in politics....those churches should be up in arms...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey,I had a Jesuit priest as Congressman. The Vatican ended
that,not the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. What do you mean "suddently" they NEVER believed in it
In their minds this country is to be run by Radical Christian Calvinists just as it was back during the good ol Puritan days where you could burn a 16 year old girl
at the stake for having hiccups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. The only separation of Church and State they ever wanted
was the type that keeps the State out of their business, not them out of the State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry, but no ...
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 11:38 PM by RoyGBiv
The idea of the separation of church and state has been challenged since the inception of what is now the United States, although the term "challenge" has a more broad meaning than we seem to be using here. That is, the idea, in and of itself, developed over time and was not established in meaning at the beginning of its use as a concept. It was not hard-coded into the American legal code (the phrase does not appear in the Constitution), yet is derived from the more concrete text of the 1st Amendment preventing the establishment of a state religion. What that means exactly could have gone in many directions. The theory that developed was that only by limiting organized religious influence in public affairs, i.e. maintaining the secular legally separate from the spiritual, could the non-establishment rule be maintained.

Ironically, devout Christians were at the forefront of this effort.

One of the first major battles over this idea after the US declared independence from England took place in 1784 when Patrick Henry proposed a measure that would have given public funding to Christian teachers. Nominally an education bill, the measure nonetheless spoke its actual purpose in its title, "A Bill for Establishing a Provision for the Teachers of the Christian Religion." His thought was that the public was aided by the furthering of religious principles, even if the government did not establish religion officially as a state doctrine. In no small part because of this idea, the nature of the battle over what constituted separation of church and state began to develop its boundaries.

Put simply, this is not new. We are simply at another point in the ongoing process of defining what separation of church and state means. The current thrust of some Christian denominations is primarily a reactionary response to the the more liberal reforms of the last three decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. The difference is in definitions
They believe in the separation of church and state too.

They believe it means the state should not have an estanblished religion. For instance, no state should be allowed to say you must be Roman Catholic to live here.

As far as prayer in school, the bible in the classoom, no they have never believed in being against that. When I went to elementary school we had a prayer every day with our snack.

So they haven't changed, other than getting more organized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. You gotta pay (taxes) to shove politics down your churchgoer's throats
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 04:56 AM by AtomicKitten
It's still the law (watch this space).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC