Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arbitrator rules UAW contract at The Advocate must be honored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:39 AM
Original message
Arbitrator rules UAW contract at The Advocate must be honored



http://www.uaw.org/news/newsarticle.cfm?ArtId=456

Friday, April 13, 2007
Arbitrator rules UAW contract at The Advocate must be honored

The Tribune Company must honor the UAW contract at a Connecticut newspaper by including a successor clause in a purchase agreement before it can sell the publication, an arbitrator has ruled.

UAW Local 2110 represents about 40 editorial staff members at The Advocate in Stamford, Conn. The union has a clause in the contract that requires a successor to honor its contract in the event of a sale.

The Tribune Co. announced on March 6 its intention to sell The Advocate to Gannett, Inc., but the sales agreement did not include a requirement that the new owner honor the UAW-negotiated labor agreement. Gannett took the position that it would not honor their contract, and forced workers to re-apply for their current positions.

“Nothing demonstrates the value of a union contract more clearly than this case,” said Bob Madore, director of UAW Region 9A, which includes Connecticut. “This clause was negotiated so that if the newspaper is sold, the reporters, photographers and other editorial staff members would be assured their working conditions could not be arbitrarily changed by a new owner.”

FULL story at link.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. In other cases I have seen the assets of a company sold but not the company itself.
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 11:22 AM by Solo_in_MD
That negates having to take the employees, pensions, etc. Just watch and see the deal get restructured along those lines. Judgle will not be able to do anything at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC