Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Pushes Back on Reporter's Iraq Questions at Unity Convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:41 PM
Original message
Obama Pushes Back on Reporter's Iraq Questions at Unity Convention
 
Run time: 02:07
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SE-ONd4ACw
 
Posted on YouTube: July 27, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: July 27, 2008
By DU Member: jefferson_dem
Views on DU: 1900
 
Bravo! Well done, Barack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. He makes me smile.
He cuts right through their bullshit each and every time.


GObama! :applause: GObama!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. he should have pointed out
that things in Afghanistan are collapsing, because of troops being pushed into Iraq rather than Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ratnesar was not going to ask Obama if his not backing the surge was a mistake.
But since it's a given that this John McCain incredible surge fixed all things wrong with Iraq, couldn't Barack be presidential and admit he was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. The objective of the "surge" was primarily politcal stability.
The violence was supposed to be thus reduced BECAUSE of that stability.

Instead, Bush has allowed the various parties to eliminate the opposition targets available to them - and so violence has decreased.

Everyone that can be killed is now dead. TA-DA! The "surge" has worked!

But still no political stability on the horizon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Success of the Surge is dependent on a failed state, period
Everyone taking the long view can see this. The surge strategy basically bought time for the general counterinsurgency plan of bribing various parties, and specifically the Sahwa groups (Awakening Council). Why do these bribes have to be paid? Because the Shia government will not build equitable wealth sharing with the Sunni,. and the Sunni have no natural resources to draw on. So, the Sunni can avoid falling into utter economic catastrophe in one of two eays: they can essentially steal resources from the Shia areas (this has been the strategy of the Baath party and the determining factor in Iraqi history for 50 years), or they can get that money somewhere else (i.e., US taxpayer funded protection money). During the insurgency, they largely operated through choice 1, causing chaos in Iraq in order to get to a point where the Shia would submit. Since the surge and counterinsurgency pay-offs, they have opted for choice #2, reaping the rewards of US fear by cashing large DoD checks on the first and fifteenth.

But the problem remains clear: The Shia government will not share revenues with the resource-less Sunni regions. Neither, needless to say, will the Kurds. That is a fundamental failure of government, and it is severe and continuing.

Obama's quite right not to sign on to the Surge Victory Hysteria. It is inevitably unstable because it rests on the shakiest foundation imaginable: the complete failure of the Iraqi state apparatus to deal equitably between ethnic groups. It rests on US payoffs as a substitute for a working government. Conservatives should understand intuitively that this arrangement is unsustainable. It is welfare extracted at gunpoint by the Sunni war tribes. Conservatives have argued forever that somebody ON welfare has no incentive to get OFF welfare. It's only their utter and slavish devotion to the flawed neo-conservative dogmas that prevent them from seeing this same dynamic in Iraq. Obama sees it. I'll do you one better: Petraeus sees it, too. He knows that payoffs as counterinsurgency is a short-term fix, not a long-term structure. He knows they need to develop real structures, and they can only do so, as Obama has argued since the beginning, if rapid withdrawal of US forces is a real event on the horizon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. He feels like a man with great gravitas after this trip.His confidence is renewed now he knows the->
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 12:01 AM by barack the house
world is stongly behind him. Hope takes many global trips renewing friendships and bolstering his potential presidency in the bookmark of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stark6935 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm sorry to say, but the surge did work
if by work you mean pushed the terrorists back into Afghanistan where they were to begin with. I can't believe nobody brings that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC