I applaud the effort and the subject matter. I would humbly submit that the criticisms offered are valid and helpful. There is enough information in this presentation to fill sixty minutes and as someone who woks in video production I know the determination to communicate that can dominate the production process but effective communication involves a sense of timing and emotion as well as compelling content.
My two cents: Review the material presented here and pare it down to half or even a quarter of the content and present it as part one. To keep viewers interested for more than three minutes you must have some aspect that draws them in. The quality of the video production technically is good, some of the text is too small and as noted, too much information too fast.
The audio is a problem. If you don't have access to a better microphone you can try applying equalization to the voice to lessen the high frequency content (treble) and maybe add some bass. It may be hard to be objective about your own voice but you want it to be listenable. Your speaking voice is acceptable but the "tone" of it is harsh.
When making your assertions always use references and don't be ashamed of them. They are your credibility, otherwise you're just another pissed off vigilante. The higher the quality of the source the better the impact. Try grouping similar issues together (racists orgs, racist comments - right-wing orgs, right wing comments etc.)
I hate this fucker Ron Paul too and I want to see you succeed but you have to be able to stand up to factual scrutiny and the better the production values the better your chances of success.
I appreciate very much the time and effort put into this.
LISTEN TO MY ASS ON THE RADIO:
http://Radio.TheFrankFactor.com