Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ed Schultz: Bill Clinton is Lying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:18 AM
Original message
Ed Schultz: Bill Clinton is Lying
 
Run time: 00:53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-X9tEOp19o
 
Posted on YouTube: January 23, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: January 24, 2008
By DU Member: peoli
Views on DU: 1995
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ed Schultz is lying when he says Clinton is lying.
See how easy that is.

Anybody can call anyone anything if they don't have to back it up with real proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Within the scope of the two specific issues that Schultz mentioned ...
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 04:40 AM by krkaufman
... he is actually correct -- but only if you categorize intentionally misleading as lying.

Personally, I've been a "Any Dem" supporter since 2000, but *Bill* Clinton's recent behavior (as well as Hillary's perpetuating the inaccuracies) is pushing me towards skipping this election, if Hillary's the nominee, if not actually voting Republican -- just to be done with Clinton politics on the national level.

p.s. I loathe Ed Schultz, but he's right on this point. Even if his anti-Clinton stance is likely fueled by the Clinton campaign's refusal to go on his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronbo60 Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. You were never a Democrat...
Thank you for "pushing" for apathy. Your check from the RNC is in the mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. A newbie accusing someone who's been here for 4 years of being an RNC plant?
All I've got to say is you've got balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. my reaction exactly. note his sig line- "you can't fix stupid" - long used by right wing hate radio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muyojoe Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. "DID HE SAY PICKING ON A BROTHA"
Wow, any idiot can make mathews show. It seems just one step away from tuckers. Did Bill's long exchange with that reporter take place before or after that show, because as usual Bill pulled out the big guns and started naming names. This guy can't back up what he says, or at least he didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ed Schultz is an
f---ing ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama BASHES Liberals and Praises Reagan i n his BOOK Audacity of HOPE page 31
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 06:41 AM by indimuse


Ed Shultz...You have lost a listener of 4 1/2 years,,,15 hours a week! You are a ZERO! on my book!

Gateway Pundit has the video.

In the best part of Obama's The Audacity of Hope, Obama, with some reservations, pours even more praise on our 40th president.


That Reagan's message found such a receptive audience spoke not only to his skills as a communicator; it also spoke to the failures of liberal government, during a

period of economic stagnation, to give middle-class voters any sense that it was fighting for them. For the fact was that government at every level had become too

cavalier about spending taxpayer money. Too often, bureacracies were oblivious to the cost of their mandates. A lot of liberal rhetoric did seem to value rights and

values over duties and responsibilities.

(Obama then veers off this brilliant thought pattern and digs a bit into Reagan's legacy.)

Audacity of Hope peaks early. The above passage appears on page 31.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In 1996, Bill Clinton declared that the era of big government is over.
So I guess you could say that the Clintons are also enemies of the liberal legacy you love so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. On various occasion there have been quotes of Reagan praise from Clintons. This is getting ott now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The quotes can be heard on Malloy show last night on podcast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloud75 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. ed shultz has lost another listener...randi rhodes and others on xm "air america"
are fair when the criticize. randi has said both obama and hillary have been wrong on certain issues but schultz just pounds and pounds and pounds on hillary everyday on the radio others are fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. i am going off topic cause i can't start my own threads yet
WTF I am tired of being disenfranchised. Super delegates? this
is pure crap whY should some ratfcuk senator's delegate vote
count more than any other American Democratic vote? What is
wrong with this picture? Eliminate that slanted crap. it is
ridiculous that someone who garners the most votes can still
be usurped by a few people who happen to have super delegate
status. so what if the candidate is not one of the cookie
cutter DLC schmucks. the whole process is starting to smack of
eliteism. Dem are supposed to be pro people not "fat
cats". finally change the constitution eliminate the
electoral college so that my vote in Florida counts for my
candidate and not  my electoral vote goes to a repub.



:rant: 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisdirt Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Have no use for Ed Schultz, but in this case he is right on. How
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 11:18 AM by bushisdirt
exactly will the lying Clintons improve the country over the lying Bushies? They won't. Romney is looking better and better.

41 year Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Vote for Romney
you deserve him. Mr. business bull shit. My lying ass hole. See how many votes he could get in MA today. The repukes as usual would follow like sheep because they are very dumb folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ed Schultz is a shit head
and should not be on MSNBC. They have enough Hillary haters such as, Andrea Mitchel, Chris Matthews, Tucker Carlson, Tim Russet, Pat Buchanan, a couple of other dopey add ons. They want Obama to win because he can be beaten by their corporate masters. The republicans are scared that if Hillary wins it will mean that the power of male superiority will be over. She would get the country back on track and they would get squeezed out of power. Can't let a woman be in charge. Look at business. How many female managers or CE O's get caught with the hand in the cookie jar? How many males got to jail or on trial. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maineman Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. deceipt is a form of lying
The Clintons are using devious mischaracterizations to attack Obama, or whomever might stand in their way. This indicates a lack of integrity, morality, and ethics. In the next election, I am voting for someone who is honest because I am tired of so many years of liars in and around the Whitehouse - Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, Rumsfeldt, and yes, Clinton.

At the very least, if a former president is going to campaign for someone, it should be done with dignity, integrity, and honesty. I am appalled by the both Clintons' behavior - to the extent that I will vote for a Republican, if necessary, for the first time in my life (age 64).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Intresting I don't listen to Schultz but I can only admire him fighting Baracks corner. WTG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's clear what context he meant the Brother comment. He meant it empathetically. He ain't perfect..
...but he is calling this right whatever way you look at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. I am staggered mostly there seems more positive support for Obama even b4 Reagangate with righties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dschmott Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Will dishonesty and sexual acting out be a part of a 2nd Cinton Presidency?
When I see dishonest (sorry I’m not going to define this for you Bill and Hillary) attacks on Obama I have to wonder. I wonder what guarantee Hillary and Bill can offer the American public that dishonesty (like we see here) and Bill’s sexual acting out will not again become a major distraction for the country from making real progress. If Hillary gets the nomination I am almost certain this will become a Republican attack avenue – and one to which I do not see a very easy answer. Even though I agree that “no one died when Clinton lied” it is not a non issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Why not just jump straight to Hillary killed Vince Foster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Ugh
How does that help, Niceypoo? Bill needs to quiet down -- he's making his wife look weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dschmott Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Because Bill's sexual exploits and dishonesty really hurt his presidency
I think its totally a legitimate question and should be a concern for anyone who wants to see a democratic president after the next election. Like it or not the fact is Hillary is carrying a lot of baggage. It doesn't help her or the democratic party to have Bill lying. Does anyone on this site honestly believe that Republicans (albeit hypocritical idiots) are going to leave this issue alone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC