Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers to Investigate Bush on Laws and Intent (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:17 AM
Original message
Lawmakers to Investigate Bush on Laws and Intent (NYT)
Lawmakers to Investigate Bush on Laws and Intent

By CARL HULSE
Published: June 20, 2007
WASHINGTON, June 19 — Lawmakers say they plan to dig deeper into the Bush administration’s use of bill-signing statements as ways to circumvent Congressional intent.

In a limited examination of the administration’s practice of reserving the authority to interpret legislation, the Government Accountability Office determined that in 6 out of 19 cases it studied, the administration did not follow the law as written after President Bush expressed reservations about some legislative directives. By using signing statements, the president has reserved the right not to enforce any laws he thinks violate the Constitution or national security, or that impair foreign relations.

The accountability office, a watchdog agency, in a report issued Monday, did not pass judgment on whether the agencies were responding to the signing statements or whether the president had the constitutional authority not to comply. But Congressional officials said Tuesday that the findings were alarming since the administration had apparently not complied with the law in 30 percent of the cases scrutinized.

..............

Mr. Conyers said the findings showed that the administration was “thumbing its nose at the law.” Mr. Fratto noted that the White House had not issued any signing statements for legislation sent to the president this year by the Democratically controlled Congress. But he said it was more a result of the legislative product rather than any new reluctance to embrace signing statements. “We don’t do a signing statement on legislation to name a post office,” he said.

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/washington/20cong.html?ref=washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess it all depends on who those 'lawmakers' are. God knows
someone should be investigating this miscreant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Simple, just add: If any signing statement is attached to this bill the bill becomes null and void.
They could shut the government down. They would have to go back and renegotiate every bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC