Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Can Count To 2 Or Higher?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 05:20 PM
Original message
Who Can Count To 2 Or Higher?
On May the 15th James Comey, testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee in response to a question by Senator Charles Schumer
said:

"In the early part of 2004, the Department of Justice was engaged — the Office of Legal Counsel, under my supervision — in a reevaluation both factually and legally of a particular classified program. And it was a program that was renewed on a regular basis, and required signature by the attorney general certifying to its legality." more at http://thinkprogress.org/comey-testimony/


The subject at the time was the the warantless wiretapping program, otherwise known as the domestic surveillance program, and so it was presumed that is the "particular" program that he was talking about. The Washington Post certainly though so when they published this:

"White House Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales and President Bush's chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., were on their way to the hospital to persuade Ashcroft to reauthorize Bush's domestic surveillance program, which the Justice Department had just determined was illegal." Full article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051500864.html

However today Attorney General Gonzalez tells us that in fact some other program was being reauthorized - that there were in fact more than one program. Comey didn't tell us anything different.

So the question to ask now is not how well they protected their program(s) from the Judiciary Committee, the question is did they ever get around to mentioning this second (or more) program to the Intelligence Committee? And beyond that, if the additional program(s) were not approved by DOJ then, are they now?

I'd say that either we heard a clear perjury today or there are a lot more questions to be asked and the Judiciary Committee isn't the only one that should be asking.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC