Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BIG Oooopphs: Republican Lawmaker Sought $3.5 MILLION Earmark for Lobbying Firm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:44 PM
Original message
BIG Oooopphs: Republican Lawmaker Sought $3.5 MILLION Earmark for Lobbying Firm
Were we not taxpayers, this might be hilarious! "Oh Congress, please give my lobbyist friend $3.5 million."

=====================================
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29962
Jonathan Allen // Congressional Quarterly Today

23 Aug 2007 // A second lawmaker this year sent the House Appropriations Committee a letter asking for — and securing — an earmark for a lobbying firm rather than its client. And like a colleague who made the same mistake, he subsequently corrected the request.

New transparency rules adopted by the House at the beginning of the year have forced members to identify the earmarks they sponsor and the recipients of those earmarks, giving the public a clearer window into how earmarked dollars are apportioned.

Rep. Tom Latham, R-Iowa, in a March 15 letter requested what became a $2 million earmark in the fiscal 2008 defense appropriations bill (HR 3222) for the development of a monoclonal anthrax antibody. His request to the committee mistakenly named Ervin Technical Associates, a boutique lobbying firm located on Capitol Hill, as the intended recipient of the earmark. But it is PharmAthene, an ETA client that pays the firm $200,000 a year, that wants the money to develop an anthrax antibody. .....

Latham’s office realized the error — and sent a corrected letter — after Congressional Quarterly reported Aug. 6 on a $3.5 million defense spending bill earmark that Rep. Bob Inglis, R-S.C., requested in a letter to the committee naming the lobbying shop Cassidy & Associates as the recipient. The firm is known for its ability to win earmarks in appropriations bills. ......

==============================
Center for Responsive Politics.
http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/firmsum.asp?txtname=Cassidy+%26+Assoc&year=2007

Cassidy & Assoc - Total Lobbying Income:

2007 = $10,480,000
includes Richard Nixon Library & Birthplace Fdtn = $160,000 (http://www.nixonfoundation.org/)

2006 = $24,185,000
Richard Nixon Library & Birthplace Fdtn = $120,000

2005 = $27,630,000
Richard Nixon Library & Birthplace Fdtn = $240,000

2004 = $27,680,000
Richard Nixon Library & Birthplace Fdtn = $240,000

2003 = $27,990,000
Richard Nixon Library & Birthplace Fdtn = $100,000

2002 = $28,880,000
2001 = $32,100,000

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. CREW: Earmarks = Long List odf Threads on Topic
Earmarks
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
http://www.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/716

CREW's /taxonomy/term/ ordering of threads is useful

Scroll the page for lots of stuff on earmarks.


Senate Minority Leader not leading on ethics/lobby reform
Submitted by crew on 13 July 2007 - 2:34pm. Earmarks Ethics reform Mitch McConnell

From The Hill, pressure is growing on Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to rein in Senator DeMint who is holding up passage of ethics reform for the sake of earmarks reform:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. This illustrates another example why common citizens just give up being
vigilant over their local municipality. They spend countless hours and countless amount of their own personal money to uncover the graft, and for all their trouble NO FUCKING AGENCY OF LAW WILL PICK UP THEIR INFORMATION OR CASE AND PURSUE IT; NO FUCKING NEWSPAPER WILL REPORT IT. Instead, the information gets filtered back to the local governmental crooks where they just learn how to file the correct paperwork to continue fucking the public over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Dang me. We could make some real money in the cynicism market these days!
Should have purchased cynicism futures in 2001 :rofl:

Seriously, is that part of the disenfranchisement plan. If so, register voters in your spare time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Do you have any doubt in your mind that Cassandra would have been
a grumpy, crotchety, short-tempered old lady before she reached middle-aged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. wooosh ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick for visibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC