Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A serious question I have, about ensuring the qualifications of the next Attorney General

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:06 PM
Original message
A serious question I have, about ensuring the qualifications of the next Attorney General
So, here's the question I've been pondering a lot today: how do we honestly ensure that the next Attorney General understands that they are not the personal lawyer of the President of the United States. How do we ensure they "get it" that they do not represent the President; they represent the American people.

The biggest reason I feel Alberto Gonzales was never qualified for the role of Attorney General, is because he always viewed himself as Bush's personal lawyer. After all, that's the capacity he served in for so long, from Bush's time as Governor of Texas, to serving as White House Counsel after the 2000 coup.

Once he became A.G., Gonzales was used to being such a loyal Bushie that it never clicked with him that his client was the American people; not the President.

And I'm honestly wondering: how, if at all possible, do we ensure that the next Attorney General is able to comprehend who they are truly serving; who their true client is. It won't be enough that they verbalize this during their confirmation hearing. We would expect nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Win the next presidential election.
It's gonna come down to that, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Correct
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Your right
and no matter what WE think the Senate will likely confirm any turd that Bu$h appoints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. The country would be better off spending the next 18 months...
without an AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC