Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Petraeus lie - FACT CHECK:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:37 PM
Original message
Another Petraeus lie - FACT CHECK:
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 06:39 PM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/10/surge-next-summer/


FACT CHECK: Petraeus To Withdraw Troops Next Summer Because Of Broken Military, Not ‘Progress’


In today’s hearing, Gen. David Petraeus suggested that he will withdrawal 30,000 troops from Iraq next summer, citing that “security gains” and future progress due to the escalation have allowed the move:

Based on all this and on the further progress we believe we can achieve over the next few months, I believe that we will be able to reduce our forces to the pre-surge level of brigade combat teams by next summer without jeopardizing the security gains that we have fought so hard to achieve.

The traditional media has largely accepted Petraeus’s spin. The New York Times reported that “the hard-won progress made in Iraq” permitted the withdrawal. “(S)ecurity progress in Iraq should allow” withdrawal next summer, reported Bloomberg. The “President’s troop escalation plan in Iraq had met its military objectives” according to Petraeus, stated ABC.

But in reality, security and political progress in Iraq is nonexistent. Petraeus, who has said he wants to stay in Iraq for 9-10 years, is in fact reducing troop levels next summer because the escalation has overstretched and overburdened the military to its breaking point.

Several current and former Bush administration officials have publicly warned for several months that current troop levels cannot be sustained past next summer:

Joint Chiefs Chairman Peter Pace: Pace “is expected to advise President Bush to reduce the U.S. force in Iraq next year by almost half” and “is likely to convey concerns by the Joint Chiefs that keeping well in excess of 100,000 troops in Iraq through 2008 will severely strain the military.” <8/24/07>

Army Chief of Staff George Casey: “Right now we have in place deployment and mobilization policies that allow us to meet the current demands. If the demands don’t go down over time, it will become increasingly difficult for us to provide the trained and ready forces.” <8/20/07>

Commanding General Odierno: “We know that the surge of forces will come at least through April at the latest, April of ‘08, and then we’ll have to start to reduce…we know that they will start to reduce in April of ‘08 at the latest.” <8/26/07>

Army Secretary Peter Geren:“(T)he service’s top official, recently said he sees ‘no possibility’ of extending the duty tours of US troops beyond 15 months.” <8/30/07>

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell: “(T)]hey probably can’t keep this up at this level past the middle of next year, I would guess. This is a tremendous burden on our troops.” <7/18/07>

The Petraeus spin operation is simply buying more time for an escalation that will ultimately mean more American and Iraqi deaths.

UPDATE: Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-NV) office put out the following fact-check of Petraeus’ testimony here and here. The Speaker’s blog adds more.
http://democrats.senate.gov/journal/entry.cfm?id=282187&
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. it makes you nuts -- even here on du we've been talking for MONTHS
about the strain iraq and the bad planning has placed on our military.

and i'm guessing there are several threads on the guys quoted above.

we have all gone through the looking glass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, indeed. We could have written his script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. 30,000 troops puts us right where we were before the surge....it's a con shellgame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. a.m. kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC