Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking- HUGE Environmental Win in Federal Court.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:48 PM
Original message
Breaking- HUGE Environmental Win in Federal Court.
Yeah, it'll be appealed, but we won it today:

Judge Rejects Carmakers' Emission Suit
By DAVE GRAM, Associated Press Writer

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

(09-12) 15:39 PDT Montpelier, Vt. (AP) --


Vermont and several other states scored a victory on Wednesday in their battle to get automakers to comply with rules aimed at reducing global warming.


A federal judge ruled that states can regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, rejecting automakers' claims that federal law pre-empts state rules and that technology can't be developed to meet them.


"There is no question that the GHG (greenhouse gas) regulations present great challenges to automakers," Judge William Sessions III, sitting in the U.S. District Court in Burlington, wrote at the conclusion of his 240-page decision. He added, "History suggests that the ingenuity of the industry, once put in gear, responds admirably to most technological challenges. In light of the public statements of industry representatives, (the) history of compliance with previous technological challenges, and the state of the record, the court remains unconvinced automakers cannot meet the challenges of Vermont and California's GHG regulations."


During a 16-day trial that concluded in May, auto industry executives testified that the regulations — adopted by California and 11 other states and pending in three others — would not stop global warming but would impose devastating new costs on the industry.


Slated to start phasing in as of 2009, the limits would require a 30 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from cars and trucks by 2016, a standard the car makers have maintained would require average fuel economy standards for cars and the lightest category of trucks of 43.7 miles per gallon.

<snip>

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/09/12/financial/f104815D35.DTL

If you've followed this fight, you know what a big win this is. I *heart* Judge Sessions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Excuse me while I jump for joy. This has a huge impact in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know!
And did you see that they expect the CA case to be dismissed?

Sessions for AG! (and i'm only half kidding- he's a great jurist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Kick and recommend this good news N?T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. so where are all the folks
who say that climate change is the most important issue facing us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great news!!
:woohoo: :woohoo:

:kick: & Recommended

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Watch the Republicans champion federal power vs. states' rights
My, how the tables have turned in that age-old struggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. repukes: States rights on abortion
Federal power when it comes to anything to do with the environment or gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Could they appeal to a higher court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R for things that give HOPE
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wasn't this the case where the Feds were using taxpayer money to lobby
against these California regs?

Nice to see a win for the environment. They are so few these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. whoo hoo!
Good news! :party:

-Alec

p.s. "Judge William Sessions III ... wrote at the conclusion of his 240-page decision." :wow: Holy Moses! Thats a lotta decidin' going on!

p.p.s. I thought Bush was the decider...? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh. Thought it was going to stick it to the Mexican truck drivers (but not the Canadians)!!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R - This is fantastic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. So the vehicles they sell in Europe and anywhere but
here will be available here now. Good. (Bloody liars)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. here in France
I have a Peugzot 206 diesel moter that gets me 60 mpg on the highway (slightly less on the expressway where the speed limit is 81mph). I bought this car three years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Yes - and the engineering it would take
to move the driver side from right to left should not be a big deal. I know our car makers here - GM for example - make great cars for Europeans but they only sell us the SUV gas guzzlers. It's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good to hear.
KandR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. Good news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cali -- thank you for posting this good news
and thanks to to Judge William Sessions III.

Industry has been pushing the idea of federal pre-emption for a long time, killing many excellent efforts by states in many environmental areas.

If Asian and European automakers can make efficient vehicles, maybe the U.S. auto industry will take the hint. Surely their sales percentages should tell them something is wrong.... or are they really that stupid that they can't recognize that U.S. citizens want high fuel efficiency cars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks for posting this.
We need every little bit of good news!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is wonderful news, Cali!

It's nice to see something good happen.

Thanks.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC