Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schwarzenegger's Job Approval High, Poll Finds (running about even with Boxer...)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:35 PM
Original message
Schwarzenegger's Job Approval High, Poll Finds (running about even with Boxer...)
Schwarzenegger's Job Approval High, Poll Finds

SACRAMENTO (AP) -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's job rating is still high, despite what some are describing as an unproductive year in the state capital.

A new Field Poll says 56 percent of voters think Schwarzenegger is doing a good job. Just 32 percent disapprove.

The survey released this morning was conducted over a ten-day period through Sunday. It ended just as the state's wildfire emergency began.

The poll says Schwarzenegger is running about even with U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer in a hypothetical matchup.

http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=34512
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. That would be a rough battle..
I know who I would vote for (Boxer) but I also know a lot of people who would support Arnold, many of them democrats. Eep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. too many Californians seem to be "star crazy" and I think it would be an epic battle too
but that Arnold could win it. He would probably win an open seat--especially if Feinstein retired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Schwarzenegger strikes me as a wolf in sheep's clothing. Something about him I could never trust.
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 12:38 PM by BrklynLib at work
He brings "Manchurian Candidate" to my mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yep. See post #6 for background links. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Wow. Thanks for all that info. I will be sure to pass it on to my CA friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. alright!
Californians need to know!

Please RECOMMEND the thread for the INFO and periodically KICK for continued exposure.

thanx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Will do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. heh, another thing...
Are you familiar with the LEVER voting machines in NY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Yes, of course. Why do you ask?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Well...
I tried sending a private message.

Are you not able to receive private messages at this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of Course the Repiggies Will Go After Boxer, She's One of the Best We Have
and the Mighty Slime Machine is still so in love with Arnie that he would be very difficult to beat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Repiggies can be 'slaughtered' with the truth re Sch*zenegger -- see posts 6 and 13 (and K&R please)
Help eliminate 'war...make it 'Sch*zenegger'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who did this poll? The Heritage Foundation?
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 12:48 PM by Cleita
They didn't poll me. Schwarzenegger's record is worse than Pete Wilson's in setting this state backwards. He hasn't accomplished any more than Grey Davis could in meeting the real problems this state has. He just gets the publicity out that he's doing a great job. That's what he learned to do as a movie star.

btw the issue that got Grey Davis in trouble, the energy situation here hasn't gotten better but worse. My family's electrical bill has tripled since he became governor. No doubt whoever is bleeding this state dry after Enron is benefitting from the wonderful Governorship of Herr Schwarzenegger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Field Poll is one of the oldest independent polling firms in California
And yes, his record is awful, but everybody on DU predicted he couldn't win a full term after that disastrous first couple of years he had as governor, and he did by a large margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. There's been a question about the integrity of our vote since
Kevin Shelley was eighty-sixed as Secretary of State shortly after Arnold began his reign and the new more neo-con friendly SOS reversed everything that Kevin was doing to make our vote more transparent and accurate. Of course our new elected SOS is finishing Kevin's job so maybe we will have an uncorrupted election the next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. "Pollster guilty of fake data conspiracy" (09/07/06)
Heh, media manipulation -- newspapers, tv...polls? -- is *Co's spite for democracy.

Pollster guilty of fake data conspiracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. one disastrous event does not make a man.
Is Schwarzenegger's rating high because he showed leadership during those devasting fires??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Californians aren't aware of the Sch*zenegger's $9B fraud (responsible for reduced services) &
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 02:12 PM by tiptoe
his anti-democracy, pro-Diebold e-vote machines efforts.

Boxer/candidates will just have to inform the California public of Sch*zenegger's anti-California, pro-Bush/Neocon interests. Sch*zenegger's advisor was Pete Wilson, designer of the "buggy" energy de-regulation program (inherited by Gray Davis) that led to the gamed-ripoff of $9 Billion (looking back, a brief intra-hour energy spike during the summer just before Gray Davis took office...has been suspected of being a test of Wilson's deregulation-system "bug" IIRC). California eventually borrowed $11 Billion against its $91B General Fund, strapping needed government programs of funding. Police and Fire service interests sought extra funding via proposition on November's ballot. It failed...and I wonder if local-revenue-generating DUIs are being dished out "extra firmly" as a result.

Sch*zenegger is no hero to California; the background (including neophyte-Gov Sch*zenegger's first-week-in-office "settling" of Lt Gov Bustamante's lawsuit for pennies-on-the-$) first appeared on the Internet — pre- and post-Recall Election — and probably has not yet been fully realized by Californians.

Also: Bill, I don't think California voters are/were fickle. Here's why... Peace Patriot
...
Due to corporate news monopoly malfeasance, the general population had not been informed about Schwarzenegger's meeting with Kenneth Lay/Enron in May 2001, to plot all this (Enron stole $9 billion from Calif., thus getting Davis in trouble with the voters due to budget shortfall--and Lay wanted this debt to be forgiven), and there was not enough time for alternative news sources to get the word out that Schwarz was a Bush Cartel shill. Time magazine put Schwarz on its cover during this very short campaign, and Larry King and others gave Schwarz (already famous from his movies) millions and millions of dollars in additional free publicity. They almost didn't need electronic vote-stealing, but they had it all set up, if needed--and had ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE minor candidates to shave votes onto (away from the main opposition, Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante).
...


See also video: The Shock Doctrine -- Naomi Klein is interviewed on Book TV CSPAN2 and post #3 references.

Help eliminate 'war'...Make it 'Sch*zenegger'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Possibly. Look what 9/11 did for Giuliani.
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 01:28 PM by Cleita
Wait until the smoke blows over and the aid promised doesn't come and maybe through no fault of his own, but through lack of support from the federal government. Then you will see what Ahnold really has done for the fire victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Unfortunately, no.
The poll was taken BEFORE the fires. I fear his rating will only go up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not if the truth about his fraud(s) gets out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm not quite sure I get it....
I read your other post #6 and believe me, I don't WANT Arnold, never voted for him and wouldn't vote for him, but I still don't quite get the connection of this 9 billion dollar fraud.

Are you claiming that there was a plot between Ken Lay/ Arnold / Pete Wilson to orchestrate the recall and get Arnold in office???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Dot-connecting...
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 03:23 PM by tiptoe
The FBI-recovered Enron computer email disclosed a May 17, 2001 meeting between Sch*zenegger and Ken Lay (i.e. after the $Billions had already been gamed-stolen) and almost-immediately upon Lt. Gov Bustamante announcing he was filing a lawsuit in an attempt to recover the stolen funds via California's Unfair Business Practices Act (after FERC commissioners — two of three appointed by Bush on recommendation of Ken Lay! — spurned Gray Davis' efforts at the federal level)...and BEFORE Sch*zenegger's "decision" to become a Recall Election candidate.

Timeline:
May 2, 2001: GOV. CRUZ BUSTAMANTE SUES TO STEM ENERGY CRISIS, ACCUSES ENERGY CARTEL OF ILLEGAL PRICE-FIXING
May 17, 2001: (from "Arnold Unplugged - It's Hasta la Vista to $9 Billion if the Governator is Selected" by Greg Palast, Oct 4, 2003)
The wannabe governor has yet to deny that on May 17, 2001, at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, he had consensual political intercourse with Enron chieftain Kenneth Lay. Also frolicking with Arnold and Ken was convicted stock swindler Mike Milken.

Now, thirty-four pages of internal Enron memoranda have just come through this reporter's fax machine tell all about the tryst between Maria's husband and the corporate con men. It turns out that Schwarzenegger knowingly joined the hush-hush encounter as part of a campaign to sabotage a Davis-Bustamante plan to make Enron and other power pirates then ravaging California pay back the $9 billion in illicit profits they carried off.

Here's the story Arnold doesn't want you to hear. The biggest single threat to Ken Lay and the electricity lords is a private lawsuit filed last year under California's unique Civil Code provision 17200, the "Unfair Business Practices Act." This litigation, heading to trial now in Los Angeles, would make the power companies return the $9 billion they filched from California electricity and gas customers.

Aug 7, 2003
LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- After dropping hints about his political ambitions, movie action hero Arnold Schwarzenegger announced Wednesday that he will run for California governor in October's recall election.

The surprise announcement came during a Wednesday afternoon taping of NBC's "The Tonight Show" with Jay Leno which was scheduled to air Wednesday night. Prior to the taping, it had been widely speculated that Schwarzenegger, 56, would announce he would not run.


BBC investigator, Greg Palast, broke the FBI/Enron story on the net and predicted what would happen if Sch*zenegger were elected. Palast was, unfortunately, spot on: Sch*zenegger took care of Ken Lay-&-energy-friends' interests by overriding Bustamante's authority and settling the latter's lawsuit in the very first week in office. Pete Wilson apparently had been an advisor to Sch*zenegger as well as the designer of the deregulation plan itself (about which Wilson had been informed of its imperfection — 'Let the democrats fix it.')

Arnold's main purpose for "running" -- at least a primary one -- seems to have been securing the $9B for the crooks by overriding Bustamante's authority. Later, Sch*zenegger would lead efforts to replace democratic SoS Kevin Shelley with appointee Bruce MacPherson, charged with re-certifying Diebold voting machines that Shelley had de-certified in four counties. These two tasks — huge for a "neophyte" politician, with Neocon destabilization/bankrupting of California as goal — are enough to have been Sch*zenegger's motivations for running.

Help eliminate 'war'...Make it 'Sch*zenegger'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where the hell do they take these polls?
There is no way Arnold is "about even" with Boxer's approval rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R !! for info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R for more exposure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
26. This sounds like 1984 Propoganda
Shite to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. You think he wants to be in the Senate, in DC much of the time?
He's been governor. He's not going for that. Arnold doesn't want to be 1 of a 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC