Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN reports that the Blackwater will not get immunity for the September 16 shootings.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:35 PM
Original message
CNN reports that the Blackwater will not get immunity for the September 16 shootings.
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 03:36 PM by kpete
Officials: Blackwater guards offered limited immunityStory Highlights
NEW: Department wouldn't launch pointless probe, spokesman says

The senior State Department official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of a lack of authorization to speak on the matter, said the department's Diplomatic Security branch does not have the right or ability to offer any kind of immunity and did not do anything that would inhibit prosecutors if charges are to be pursued.


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- No blanket immunity deal was offered to Blackwater guards for their statements regarding a shootout in Iraq last month that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead, two senior State Department officials told CNN Tuesday.

However, some kind of limited immunity was apparently offered by State Department investigators when they questioned the Blackwater personnel apparently involved in the shootings, the officials said.

CNN previously reported the guards were promised their statements would not be used against them in a criminal prosecution as long as the statements were true.

ABC News reported that it had obtained the text of the deal, which showed the guards were given "use immunity" in exchange for detailing what happened during the incident on September 16.

more at:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/30/blackwater.immunity/index.html?iref=topnews

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. As a gesture of solidarity with the Iraqi government...
the U.S. should hand over all the suspects and let the Iraqi judicial system deal with them. I won't be shedding any tears for these criminal mercenaries.

Kick and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. After all, it was good enough for Saddam....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What better way to prove that Saddam's trail was fair and impartial
than to use the same judicial system to try, condemn, and execute these Blackwater mercenaries.

Heck, if we hurry, there may even be time to show they're guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. it's still IMMUNITY ----- link
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 03:58 PM by spanone
found this:

Limited-use immunity, as officials explained to the newspaper, means that security guards were promised they would not be prosecuted for anything they said in their interviews with the authorities as long as their statements were true.
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20070031193&ch=10/30/2007%202:24:00%20PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They can use your testimony to convict others, but not you
they can use the testimony of another to convict you, but not the other.

If you try each suspect separately, you can use all of the testimony in each case, except that which was rendered by the individual being tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't understand. Why didn't we torture them for those details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC