Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

* Admin Revises Rule for Employers That Hire Immigrants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 07:42 AM
Original message
* Admin Revises Rule for Employers That Hire Immigrants
Revised Rule for Employers That Hire Immigrants

By JULIA PRESTON
Published: November 25, 2007


The Bush administration will suspend its legal defense of a new rule issued in August to punish employers who hire illegal immigrants, conceding a hard-fought opening round in a court battle over a central measure in its strategy to curb illegal immigration, according to government papers filed late Friday in federal court.

Instead, the administration plans to revise the rule to try to meet concerns raised by a federal judge and issue it again by late March, hoping to pass court scrutiny on the second try. The rule would have forced employers to fire workers within 90 days if their Social Security information could not be verified.

The government’s proposal was a response to an indefinite delay to the rule ordered Oct. 10 by the judge, Charles R. Breyer of Federal District Court in San Francisco. Judge Breyer found that the government had failed to follow proper procedures in issuing the rule and that it should have completed a survey of its impact on small business.

He also found that the Social Security database the government would use to verify workers’ status was full of errors, so the rule could lead to the dismissal of many thousands of workers who were American citizens or legal immigrants.

In a four-page motion filed Friday, the government, without acknowledging any flaws in the original rule, asked Judge Breyer to suspend the case so the Department of Homeland Security could rewrite the rule and conduct the small-business survey, which it expects to do by March 24. The government said that it wanted to “prevent the waste of judicial resources” and that it was confident the amended rule would “fully address the court’s concerns.”

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/washington/25immig.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let the Corporations exploit illegals some more
If I owned a business I would be jumping for joy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. This administration was never serious about punishing employers who exploited illegal labor
Sure, there were a few raids of businesses, mostly for the cameras and to throw a little red meat at the Michelle Malkin and Michael Savage types, but otherwise nothing really changed. Now they figure that they can quietly go back to business as usual by revising the policy during a holiday weekend when no one is paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nothing will be done until we all have biometric IDs..
Edited on Sun Nov-25-07 08:34 AM by SoCalDem
The rabid righties fear being identified :wtf:, and so do many lefties, so the employer abuses of undocumented workers will roll happily on for them.. As long as they have an "out", they will never be "blamed"..

Another reason why so many oppose biometric ID (combined with a valid passport), is because those documents would also be necessary to deliver nationalized health care.. Until that happens, we will continue to have a ragged patchwork quilt of health benefits that are administered by the employers many of us are indentured to.

republican legislators will never pass biometric IDs, but not for the reasopns they give.. the real reason is that once we could all be verified to be CITIZENS, it would be hard to deny us rights to vote, or work or go to school or healthcare (if we ever get that lucky)

It's not about the spirit of anonymity or rugged individualism.. it's always about the MONEY..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC