Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey huckabee... the USA was not founded as a christian nation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:39 AM
Original message
Hey huckabee... the USA was not founded as a christian nation
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 08:46 AM by ORDagnabbit
I love history. So much there, hard to re-write and all you have to do is want to dig for the truth.

This Treaty of Tripoli stated categorically that the United States of America is not founded upon the Christian religion, and that this treaty, with that statement intact, was read before and passed unanimously by the United States Senate, and was signed by the President of the United States without a hint of controversey or discord, and remains a definitive statement from the "Founding Fathers" on the secular nature of American government

Preliminary treaty began with a signing on 4 November, 1796 and ratified by the Senate with John Adams signature on 10 June, 1797

Treaty of Tripoli. In Article 11, it states:

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

4 good sites on it.
The first one is the actual minutes taken from The Journal of the Senate including the Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate, John Adams Administration 1791-1801

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tripoli1.htm
http://earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html
http://www.nobeliefs.com/Tripoli.htm
http://www.sunnetworks.net/~ggarman/tripoli.html


Below is a link to a great article specifically on the senators who signed the treaty


It was only the third time that a vote was recorded when the vote was unanimous! (The next time was to honor George Washington.)There is no record of any debate or dissension on the treaty.

the vote they cast was ordinary, routine, normal. It was, in other words, quite well accepted, only a few years after first the Constitution and then the First Amendment were ratified, that "the Government of the United States of America was not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." After a bloody and costly civil war and the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment determined that citizens of the United States cannot have their rights abridged by state or local governments either, religious liberty for all was established. Governmental neutrality in matters of religion remains the enduring basis for that liberty.

http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/buckner_tripoli.html



Then you might wanna read Jefferson

http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0205/tolerance.html

Campaigning for religious freedom in Virginia, Jefferson followed Locke, his idol, in demanding recognition of the religious rights of the “Mahamdan,” the Jew and the “pagan.” Supporting Jefferson was his old ally, Richard Henry Lee, who had made a motion in Congress on June 7, 1776, that the American colonies declare independence. “True freedom,” Lee asserted, “embraces the Mahomitan and the Gentoo (Hindu) as well as the Christian religion.”

In his autobiography, Jefferson recounted with satisfaction that in the struggle to pass his landmark Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom (1786), the Virginia legislature “rejected by a great majority” an effort to limit the bill’s scope “in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan.”

And then do some more reading with actual fact based research on who founded the country, who wrote the constitution and where they came from. (stupid history and its stupid facts always messing up the repukes)

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050221/allen


I wont bore you with quotes except for this one from the article.....

James Madison believed that "religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprize." He spoke of the "almost fifteen centuries" during which Christianity had been on trial: "What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution."


Then read about the actual religion of the founders..

http://www.deism.com/washington.htm

Heres some great history on Washington

After George Washington's death, Christians made an intense effort to claim him as one of their own. This effort was based largely on the grounds that Washington had regularly attended services with his wife at an Episcopal Church and had served as a vestryman in the church. On August 13, 1835, a Colonel Mercer, involved in the effort, wrote to Bishop William White, who had been one of the rectors at the church Washington had attended. In the letter, Mercer asked if "Washington was a communicant of the Protestant Episcopal church, or whether he occasionally went to the communion only, or if ever he did so at all..." (John Remsberg, Six Historic Americans, p. 103). On August 15, 1835, White sent Mercer this reply

In regard to the subject of your inquiry, truth requires me to say that Gen. Washington never received the communion in the churches of which I am the parochial minister. Mrs. Washington was an habitual communicant.... I have been written to by many on that point, and have been obliged to answer them as I now do you (Remsberg, p. 104).


Then one final stop with a nice essay on the The Christian Nation Myth

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/farrell_till/myth.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. What an excellent resource!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. People of this mind are usually thinking of the Pilgrims... 1692. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Who came here for religious freedom
and promptly started imposing theirs on everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Long live separation of Church and State!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hucklenutz Isn't Speaking To You Or Me
He's speaking in tongues...the code of the fundies. It's the South Carolina Baptist mating call. The only difference now than in past elections is the splintered GOOP forces these codewords into the open. The game for the Huckster is over if he can't win in SC...and if he does, the shivers this sends through the rest of the GOOP will be well worth the watch. This isn't just the Huckster at work here, but the fundies supporting him. They're showing political muscle which I suspect will be used after the elections as the remnants of the GOOP splinter further in the finger-pointing of "who lost".

The Huckster's an opportunist...he sees his meal ticket as a cross of gold...getting power by pandering to these people...speaking their language and doing it out in the open. In the past he could have walked into a church in Arkansas, spewed this shit and it was ignored, now it scares the shit out of the "establishment", but he doesn't care...all he sees are winning votes and delegates and parlaying that into a VP gig or some other lucrative deal. Just think of him as this year's anti-Howard Dean. He's made a lot of noise and has energized the religious right...now will he be the future of the GOOP or its ruin?

As a kid, I was taught about the Puritans and other settlers who came here to avoid a state religion...a government "divinely" selected. My grandparents came to this country a century ago also with the belief that the separation of church and state assured them the freedom to practice their faith while contributing to the common good. I think this belief is ingrained in a majority of us...the decendends of one immigrant group or another.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Dear KharmaTrain
You will shortly be receiving my invoice for the 10 minutes of billable time I lost while laughing out loud over your It's the South Carolina Baptist mating call." :rofl: Seriously, good post and so true. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here is another resource
http://freethought.mbdojo.com/foundingfathers.html

More writings and quotes from our founders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. awesome! thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good job! Bookmarking for later!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angela Shelley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for the fine research work!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. The founding fathers considered the U.S. to be a bulwark
against religious intolerance of the type that had seen in Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Excellent post, lots of great information. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. the american taliban
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. But you know they will keep saying it and saying it until almost everyone believes it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes. They mitigate the statement by saying
"The US were founded on judeo-christian values and principles", which is harder to disprove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. If there was one lick of honesty among them
then the modern-day Puritans among us would simply say "we know America was not founded as a Christian nation, nor on Biblical principles, nor by men who were in any way anything other than agnostics, Deists, and secular humanists. But this was a mistake that we seek to undue. America should have been founded as a Christian theorcracy, and by God we're going to make it one, come Hell or high water!"

Then perhaps I could at least respect their candid statement of their intentions. Anything else is hypocrisy of the highest order. It appears we today are mere shadows of men such as Paine, Jefferson, Washington, and Franklin. It has taken over two hundred years but I fear we have finally squandered the last of the heritage of reason, logic, and humanity that they bled in order to bequeath to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Do Christians believe in a democratic Republic?
I feel that (most) do not. They look forward to Jesus coming back to this planet and ruling as
"The King of Kings". Most Christians want a Monarchy led by Jesus. Since they must wait until Jesus
returns they will settle for someone else being their Christian King until Jesus arrives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I disagree
They have let the Republic stand for over 200 years. They could easily have voted it out of existance any time in the last 200 years because they are a significant majority of voters in the country. What do you have to support you broad brush assertion that "most Christians want a Monarchy led by Jesus".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for the post....
great resources and I'll bookmark for reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. Early morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent resource that many people in this nation convienantly distort
Great work, I'm saving this one for future reference!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. He's trying to appeal to the southern voters.
I have had people down south actually tell me. The first amendment only applies to christians. The first amendment was written to protect christians from persecution. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC