Which entitlement program costs more: Welfare? Or "government subsidy"?

[Deja Q]

Poll question: Which entitlement program costs more: Welfare? Or "government subsidy"?

http://www.moneyweek.com/file/12641/how-the-dollars-collapse-will-lead-to-a-new-gold-standard.html

Asia has the "second mover advantage" of being privy to all the Western World's mistakes. They are able to see where profligacy and runaway entitlement programs have led. Their top-down orientation will enable them to rein in expensive entitlement programs or, better yet, curtail young ones before they grow bigger. Not being as mentally and emotionally tied to the workings of empire and the capitalist welfare mentality, Asia will successfully cut the cord faster. In doing so, Asia will also rely on its citizens' natural propensity to trust precious metals and hoard them as a store of value in the first place.

[Echo In Light]

1. Reveals rightists' indifference and outright contempt for humanity

http://www.corporations.org/welfare/

http://www.progress.org/banneker/cw.html

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Nader/CutCorpWelfare_Nader.html

http://www.ourfuture.org/corporate-welfare