Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush’s '09 Budget: 'As Good As It Gets For Defense Contractors'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:11 PM
Original message
Bush’s '09 Budget: 'As Good As It Gets For Defense Contractors'
from AlterNet's PEEK:



Bush’s '09 Budget: 'As Good As It Gets For Defense Contractors'

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 2:24 PM on February 11, 2008.

Defense experts are surprised at how generous the Bush administration is willing to be with the taxpayers' money.



Last week, President Bush submitted his $515.4 billion defense spending budget for FY '09. Contained within that budget is a windfall for defense contractors -- "$104.2 billion for weapons procurement and nearly $80 billion for research and development." This budget is 7.5 percent higher than the current year's.

Even Defense experts are surprised at how generous the Bush administration is willing to be with the taxpayers' money, in light of a faltering economy and deep cuts to domestic programs:

"The expectation has been that it can't continue to increase as it has," Phil Finnegan, a defense analyst at the Teal Group in Fairfax, said of defense spending. "But it has surprised everyone to see how long this increase has continued. This budget was a great budget for all defense contractors." {...)

"The fiscal year 2009 budget may be about as good as it gets for defense contractors," said Steve Kosiak, vice president of budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "We have had eight years of quite dramatic growth in weapons acquisition accounts. Whoever the next president is, it is unlikely that we are going to continue a major buildup.


The administration may get its way on many of these spending requests. The military has dispatched "legions of lobbyists and defense contractors" to Capitol Hill to push for approval. Several lawmakers are actually asking for spending above what the administration requested. Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX) and James Inhofe (R-OK), for example, are lobbying for F-22 fighter planes, even though Defense Secretary Robert Gates has deemed more of these useless planes unnecessary.

A 2007 report by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform found that between 2000 and 2005, procurement was the "fastest growing component of federal discretionary spending." Non-competitive and sole-source contractors rose "by 115% from $67.5 billion in 2000 to $145 billion in 2005."

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/76687/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Greedheads in the Pentagon, White House and Congress stole my country's future.
Ike warned us.
JFK tried to do something about it.
They couldn't stop the Monster.

Thanks for the heads-up, marmar. Proud to K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Word. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC