Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Rupert Murdoch be tried for war crimes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:00 PM
Original message
Could Rupert Murdoch be tried for war crimes
because through his media empire, he deliberately attempted to mislead the general public worldwide on WMDs and with misinformation concerning Iraq? Or am I drawing a long bow? Does he deserve to get off scott free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is most definitely elligible for being tried
There is precedent for ti.
After the Rwanda genocide three media members from Rwanda were convicted for war crime by the Iternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
After WW2 Julious Striecher,A newspaper owner, was tried and hanged for his part in poisoning the minds of the German people.Joseph Goebbels,the Riech minister for propadanda,killed himself to avoid facing justice for his crimes.
So yes,Murdoch and any other media personality or owner can,and should,be held liable for their complicity in war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you think anybody at the moment is working on that objective?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know of any official legal authorities
or courts that are looking into the matter.
There are a lot of websites and individuals collecting and saving evidence however.Hopefully it will be put to good use someday.

My opinion is that no investigations of media will take place until after the bush administration itself has been formally charged with war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would say that he has committed treason and he has used
the public airwaves to mislead and misinform the masses to support, perpetuate and promote the war.

He should be tried right along with the rest on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes "Incitment to Genocide"... the "Official" naame of the crime n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What a very appropriate charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. God, I hope not.
I can't stand Murdoch, but this reminds me of nothing so much as the flip side of the Freeper question: "Can the media be tried for treason?" And I don't think, as one poster suggested, that Murdoch is analagous to Streicher or the Rwandan prosecutions. In any case, it's such a pointless game. It's not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Perhaps he could be 'rendered' unto the North Koreans? Fight fire with fire! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. We tried Julius Streicher, publisher of Der Sturmer after WWII
I don't see why Rupert Murdoch shouldn't be judged too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, the prescedent has already been set.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wish - Murdoch the criminal is red to the elbows with the blood of innocents
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Great minds think alike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
talkinghead Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't like this idea
anymore than when I hear Republicans say that member of the NYT should be tried for "revealing" secret programs for catching terrorists. There is still such a thing as a free press and there were plenty of people who didn't buy in to what Murdoch was selling. Besides, he did bring us Fox Soccer Channel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hi talkinghead!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think the INS should investigate him for his Green Card to begin
with, how he got his citizenship and his international business dealings as well as the ones in America. I'm sure there is a lot of shady goings ons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Now I'd Love To See What Charges Could Be Brought
Unfortunately, Faux...with all its lies is still protected by the First Ammendment. While we despise this GOOP propaganda outlet, no one is forced to watch it (unless you're in the military) and, despite the contrary, we are all "smart enough" to know better. Face it, many of those who suck on the Faux nipple do so willingly and for a purpose...they WANT to hear what those fuksticks have to say. If they didn't find it there, they'd find it elsewhere. Better the devil we know, can see and debunk...then forcing these goons underground...where their propaganda still got out. Remember, Faux wasn't around in '94, it was our friends in the other "corporate media" who played cheerleader then...and have been doing so since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC