|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:58 PM Original message |
Is Bush able to issue "blanket" pardons on his way out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. He'll TRY to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. pardons cannot be reversed -> details on pardons here -> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Oops - your post after I posted my question. Thanks. Good to know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. No they can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Damn! For a moment there I had hope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. The power to pardon is absolute and final. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. "...except in cases of impeachment." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Impeachment is a political act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. But, as noted above, he CANNOT pardon anyone who is under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. You're speaking in absolutes in a much less than clear issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Well, I said it so it must be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Congress has no say in pardons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. And, if it IS possible, can anything be done to rescind the pardons after the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. He can only pardon "charged and convicted" sentences. He's not the Pope ya'know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Then how did Ford pardon Nixon? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. The Nixon precedent says that he can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Nixon was impeached and resigned. Nobody sought to test the "may or may not"; he was gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. "He was impeached" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Nixon resigned and was pardoned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. There was no precedent set with Ford pardoning Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. It is my understanding that there has never been a pardon of that sort before or after. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #23 |
40. No incoming president had ever pardoned an outgoing president before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. dup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
28. Not true, Bush 41 pardoned Weinberger before trial or conviction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I would like to see him pardon himself and his cronies. The list of names would be interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. A president can't pardon war crimes because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. so very true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Presidents can't pardon themselves. He could resign early, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I see no reason why a president couldn't pardon himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. It depends if its related to impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Such a pardon would not avoid impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
19. you betcha he can do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Same thing I was thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. No true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Upon conviction the Senate could stipulate all those variables |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Impeached and found guilty and removed from office, I should have clarified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
37. pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. having never been done and never been litigated, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. That is the same basic conclusion I have come to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
39. Yup.. all will be "wiped clean" and pure again.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. How true, how sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billky (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
44. Bush pardons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC