Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Scandal That Nearly Destroyed John McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:28 AM
Original message
The Scandal That Nearly Destroyed John McCain
http://www.alternet.org/election08/77662

The Scandal That Nearly Destroyed John McCain

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted February 25, 2008.

Long before the Iseman controversy, John McCain's role in the Keating Five scandal nearly ruined his Senate career.

Way back in 1988 my co-authors and I were putting the final touches to our book, Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans when someone slipped us a plain brown envelop. Inside was a transcript of a meeting between thrift regulators and five US senators who had interceded on behalf of Arizona S&L owner Charles Keating. At the time the regulators were warning that Keating's thrift, Lincoln Savings and Loan, was dangerously insolvent and that Keating and his cohorts -- including then junk bond king, Mike Milken, were robbing the federally-insured thrift blind -- or, more precisely, robbing the US taxpayers blind.

Keating had been generous in sharing his new-found wealth with the five senators, particularly his two Arizona senators, John McCain and Dennis DeConcini. They became known as "The Keating Five."

Alarmed by such high-powered political arm twisting, FHLBB attorney, William Black, decided to document the meeting. He claims to this day that he did not secretly record the five senators. But over the years I've read countless transcripts and I remain certain that the following is a transcription taken off an actual recording.

Of course, once authenticating the transcript we wasted no time including it in the appendix of our book. The disclosure of the meeting and verbatim remarks by each senator caused them no end of misery. One would have thought McCain especially had learned his lesson about messing with the work of federal regulators. And it appeared he had. But then comes the revelation that he once again chummed up to an industry group -- this time telecom -- and inserted himself into the regulatory process in ways that look distressingly similar to the Keating affair.

The Keating affair was about money and influence, not sex. This new revelation may or may not have sex in it -- but fankly, I couldn't care less. I don't lay awake at night worrying if my senator is getting laid by the wrong people, I worry if they are getting paid by the wrong people.

In the case of Charles Keating that money and influence, and the delays caused by political pimping by people like McCain, cost American small shareholders and taxpayers dearly:

Much has been made of the $2 billion that it will cost taxpayers to bail out Charles H. Keating Jr.'s Lincoln Savings and Loan Association. But for the people who were persuaded to invest their life savings in now-worthless securities, the cost is emotional as well as financial. (NYT - 1989)

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would have destroyed most politicians
It definitely would have destroyed any Democratic politician, but the republicon code of honor is corruption.

This needs to be pull back out of the closet and displayed for the American people to see what kind of crook McCain really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CookCountyResident Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Keating Five
Some history:


After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined in 1991 that Alan Cranston (D-CA), Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ), and Donald Riegle (D-MI) had substantially and improperly interfered with the FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings, while John Glenn (D-OH) and John McCain (R-AZ) had been only minimally involved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Both Quote are "American Heroes" unquote
Space and war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReformedChris Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Its amazing to me that Glenn (and McCain) got off still..
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 10:28 AM by ReformedChris
Glenn was in dire financial straights due to his failed 84 Presidential Bid so he was wide open to this kind of curruption. I guess that whole "America's Hero" tag gets you into different doors and out of others. What Im surprised about was Glenn going in the tank in the first place. Glenn was incredibly close to JFK and RFK, they looked at him as a torch bearer in the future. He turned out to be a dissapointment for a guy that had so much potential. As for McCain, he had that white horse status still and had the big mo on his side, he is still a pathetic and angry man to me now. Totally full of crap everytime he talks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't know if it will be an effective argument
The new york times irregularities, if followed up on might be better grounds for attack.

The Keating Five stuff I suspect he could just say "Hey it was an error but I learned the error of my ways which is why I have championed campaign finance reform."

Bryant
check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC