Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby jury asks for different type of flip chart paper

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:45 AM
Original message
Libby jury asks for different type of flip chart paper
CNN: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Libby trial jury quibbles over flip-chart paper

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The jury in the Scooter Libby trial has asked for a particular type of flip chart paper, after eschewing the kind the government had offered, according to a source on the defense team.

"They want the kind they can stick to the wall," the source told CNN Thursday, holding up an example of the poster-sized paper and sticking it to the marble walls of the hallway between the defense suite and the jury room.

The papers have adhesive in the upper corners similar to Post-It notes. After the jury made the request, both the prosecution and defense came up with such presentation pads, typically arrayed from an easel, flip-chart style.

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/03/libby-trial-jury-quibbles-over-flip.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. They must be making one hell of a flow chart.
This is a very good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Never thought this would be nominated for Greatest! But you're right --
could be significant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. WHile others mock them, I see these jurors taking their charge very seriously.
A mere flip chart is obviously not cutting it, therefore they need to expand their flow chart/possible time line. While obviously I don't know, I'm only speculating, I'm imagining a time line that is taking over a wall. I think this is very significant and interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. ditto - very good sign.
The more the jury focuses on the facts presented during the courtroom procedings, the more likely they'll return conviction(s) for Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Exactly.
The facts as a stand alone work against Libby. The only thing the defense had going for them was Wells' emotional breakdown at closing, and that (as reported) seemed rather embarrassing. I think we're going to have a conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought they were sent home for the day....??????
oh well --- have they asked for highlighters or markers in assorted colors yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They were sent home at the end of yesterday.
They are back deliberating today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. What seems so so so Obvious to me---obviously is not to the jurors! dang
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Also keep in mind, they're supposed to avoid all news reports on the trial
That may complicate matters somewhat for the jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Well, we have the benefit of legal analysis and editorials,
have ruminated about all of the possibilities through out these last 3.5 years, while, these jurors have only heard the facts as stated in the trial. Honestly, if it wasn't for the fantastic analysis of H2O man and the other Plameologists here, I don't think I would understand the whole Libby picture, nor would I understand the whole cast of characters involved. I think they are taking their time, methodically discussing a time line, etc, something that I have had the opportunity to mull over for 3.5 years. I'm still positive about the outcome. It's frustrating to us, I know, because we've been following this for a long time, but I just think they are being thorough, imho, something that we would hope any jury would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. It almost sounds like they're going through the whole task, each time
for each count. They sent a question out about Q3, then a note of 'thanks, but no thanks'. Hopefully, they're just minding their Ps and Qs on the counts and not trying to solve the question they weren't asked to deliberate: Who dunnit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. We are a culture of visual learners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. so will they be looking for video evidence that Libby lied under oath??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. at least it seems they are taking their assignment seriously
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 10:52 AM by jsamuel
unlike the T-shirt thing... which still bothers me... especially since the only one not wearing one got kicked out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. To many paper cuts I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Jesu Cristo. The jury chair must be a business major.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Or an engineer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Or an educator (principals love flow charts).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. I see them trying to spell it out for the lone wingnut holdout nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. HAHA... sad, but probably true
except I can't decide it that holdout is more likely to be actually clueless or just pretending to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. Send them round postem notes so they can stick them to the wall and
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 11:17 AM by The Backlash Cometh
connect the dots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. My theory: no one wants to go back to work. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. So, Scooter didn't hand over his duct tape and tell them to deal with it?
:evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:

*sigh* I had a 'feeling' today would be the day they returned a verdict...late in the day, but really thought it would be today. I'll try to keep my hourly check-in on the cables for LIVE! and BREAKING NEWS!, but by the time 3pm rolls around I may have to chalk up my gut feeling to hopeful dreaming. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. dumb question....
with these types of charges - does the verdict have to be unanimous or just a majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Not absolutely positive, but pretty sure it has to be unanimous
I've heard several 'journalists' speak of the defense only needing one juror. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. You're right
In a criminal trial the jury must be unanimous and if not, its a hung jury
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. I can't handle this excitement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'm amazed Libby's attorney actually put up enough of an argument to warrant all this analysis
From everything I'd read, it sounded like he'd provided little defense and the evidence in the case was very solid. Guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. My guess is they are creating 'checklists' for each element of each crime charged....
...and putting the evidence to support each element on the wall beside each checklist.

As the jury agrees on each element it is checked off.

Keeps everyone apprised of what is left to agree upon, and what they are hopelessly hung about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. After all of this, they better come up with solution to Iraq and all of the ME problems!!!
WTF are they doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. I hope there are a few good apples on that jury
And not a group of "can't make up my mind" people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. All it takes is one to vote 'not guilty' and its a hung jury
and then Fitz has to decide whether to re-try him.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wheee! It's the timeline! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. The cynic in me says
it's an all-out campaign by ten of the eleven remaining jurors, putting together this huge, detailed timeline, to spell out in huge detail why they should convict, to that Moonie Times wingnut who's trying to hang the jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. I am very proud of these eleven* anonymous Americans.
They're taking their task as a jury very seriously, and they seem to be both quite intelligent and working extremely hard.

* The twelfth juror still hasn't been replaced, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. You are correct that there are 11 jurors.
The 12th juror has not been replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC