|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:40 PM Original message |
Kucinich on with Randi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. listening now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. So it is NOT DEAD, just on life support for thirty days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. What happens after 30 days? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. He probably reads the whole thing to the House again for 6 hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Reminds of the joke about the british police officer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. He just referred it to Committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. if there are no hearings in 30 days,he will come back with it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. what a bull dog he is, he will bring it back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Telling Randi that it has not gone to committee to die but will be on hold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. This guy has more SPINE AND GUTS in his small frame than ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. If the Dem's don't act, they will give Nader ammunition to attack them with for being complicit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. You got it -- not to mention the loss of respect of all of US ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Nader will say the Congress was too busy with fund raising to uphold the constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. I hope with Obama we have the chance to purge the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
61. We all project our hopes on Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. "I am NOT going to let this go!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. we should be the same way not let it go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. HR 1258 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. Thanks for the Link! Conyers phone: 202-225-5126 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. we have to hit them hard, and say we are not irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
12. "Call your REP and ask them to support H. R. 1258" ! ~Dennis Kucinich~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. IMPEACH THE WHOLE HOUSE FOR NOT LIVING UP TO THEIR OATH OF OFFICE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. oh, I am angry!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Members of the House are not subject to impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. JUST GET RID OF THEM I DON'T CARE HOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Members of the House are not subject to recall either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The individual states can't recall their reps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. No, they cannot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I see now that Conyers can and will get rid of Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:09 AM Response to Reply #30 |
54. How will Conyers get rid of Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. The Constitution does not delegate any power to the Speaker to decide impeachment issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I guess that means that she can't stop Kucinich from impeaching Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. But she seems to be stopping Conyers from doing his job, or someone is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. How exactly has she stopped Conyers from doing his job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I read somewhere, perhaps here, that a condition of him becoming Chairman of the Judicial Committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. And Conyers hasn't had the balls to go to the Caucus and fight her on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I don't know. Do you have any idea why a man that introduced his own Impeachment Resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Perhaps because he knows that it is bad politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Then to hell with our country because of politics?To hell with the Constitution because of politics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Perhaps he, like a majority in the Democratic controlled House, doesn't believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. If they started a year and half ago, Bush would already be gone. I'm sorry, I don't buy it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Or perhaps it would have failed to win a majority vote in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 05:27 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. And that makes me wonder about a lot of their motives. I have a Progressive Congressman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 07:10 AM Response to Reply #49 |
66. Makes me wonder what is on Bush's illegal wire-tappings. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlaGranny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:22 AM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Have you thought about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:24 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. maybe Pelosi has threatened Conyers to take away his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 05:24 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. All I know is that with her actions, I have no trust in her at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. we can all speculate but something is definitely going on with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. It reeks. I get sick to my stomach when I see her playing nice nice with Shrub when she should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Steny is involved too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. You can prove that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Mature people are able to be civil to those with whom they disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. So you would be politely civil to Ted Bundy? Charles Manson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #48 |
58. She doesn't need to earn your trust. Only the trust of the Democrats in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Which leads me to mistrust their motives. There is a criminal in the oval office. Why don't they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 06:55 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Perhaps they feel that the best strategy is focus on the November election rather than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 06:59 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. That is such BS. If the Congress Impeached and it went to trial, the media would finally have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 05:59 AM Response to Reply #47 |
50. She cannot do that. Only a vote by the full House can remove him as Chairman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
22. K&R thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. Kucinich's stand reminds me of Con. John Quincy Adams |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Does that mean that Bush will be impeached 15 years after Kucinich dies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geomon666 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
27. So is she calling him a fraud and attention whore like some of the fine folks on here do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
57. heh - did you try the title without the "with", the first time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Perv |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC