Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Net worth of U.S. households skyrockets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:24 PM
Original message
Net worth of U.S. households skyrockets
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070308/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/fed_household_finances_1

WASHINGTON - The net worth of U.S. households climbed to a record high in the final quarter of last year, boosted mostly by gains on stocks, the Federal Reserve reported Thursday. Net worth — the difference between households' total assets, such as houses and bank accounts, and their total liabilities, such as mortgages and credit card debt, totaled $55.6 trillion in the October-to-December quarter.

That marked a 2.5 percent growth rate from the third quarter, the previous quarterly record high. Stocks gains helped fuel the increase in net worth, although real-estate gains played a role, too. For all of last year, households' net worth rose by 7.4 percent, a slower pace than the 7.9 percent increase registered in 2005.

Household debt, meanwhile, grew by 8.6 percent in 2006, down from a 11.7 percent increase in the prior year. The Fed said this deceleration "was accounted for by much slower growth of home mortgage debt." Home mortgage debt growth slowed to a 8.9 percent last year, compared with a 13.8 percent increase in 2005. This year's growth in home mortgage debt was the smallest increase in six years.

After a five-year boom, the housing market fell into a deep slump last year. Sales cooled. So did home prices, which had been galloping ahead, making consumers feel more wealthy and more inclined to spend. Economists said Thursday's report suggest households' finances are holding up fairly well to any strains caused by the troubled housing market and well as some sluggishness in overall economic growth. Analysts said that's because the jobs climate remains in good shape and income growth has picked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. So...
When Bill Gates value goes up 30 billion, does that mean by this formulation that we (300 million US pop) go up 10,000 in value?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. If any Bushevik Organization is doing the calculating, you can bet your ass it is
They lies like Soviets, and their numbers are as fraudulent as Soviet Toilet Paper Production Reports and Agricultural Five-Year Plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Ah, yes, the Bill Gates analogy. Excellent point.
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 08:42 PM by Canuckistanian
Bill Gates walks into a bar in Abilene, TX.

All of a sudden, the "average income" in that bar is $200 Million/year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. With the higher price in fuel and food I broke even
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Must be someone else's household
I haven't seen a raise in the last 3 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Are we being graded on a curve?
This strikes me as weird.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's the only explanation
Every household I know is just getting by! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Same here.
It's got to be an aggregate they're using. It makes no sense to me otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Which households did they count?
It certainly wasn't mine! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Not mine, either
The '90s were a far better time financially than this crappy decade has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. HUH?!?!?!
How can poverty go up 12% and living-wage jobs go down 16% and service sector jobs go up 18.5% and household net worth 'skyrocket'?

:shrug:

Are these 'analysts' hand-picked by economic profiteers? :shrug:

I mean, this assertion is just so UNreal that,...I HAVE to believe there is an effort to "fix" the numbers, here.

Well,...I'm sorry,...that just HAS TO BE BULLSHIT!!! I don't care what the so-called "experts" or "analysts" say,...I see what I see and it is inconsistent with "their" representations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. What a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. And when you remove the billionaires and multi-millionaires...
that average plumets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. gee i think my wife and i lost 20-25 thousand
in the last year and half. "our future is so bright.." if we could only afford shades...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Jesus. How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gee, maybe I need to fire my financial advisor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Fuzzy math
All the reports I have heard of say median household income is down, and savings is at a negative.

Must be using that Fox news calculator or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC