Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards's Ex-Lover Rejects Idea Of DNA Test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mathwhiz Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:13 PM
Original message
Edwards's Ex-Lover Rejects Idea Of DNA Test
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/09/AR2008080901298.html?nav=hcmodule

Rielle Hunter, the former presidential campaign aide who had an affair with John Edwards, said yesterday that she will not pursue DNA testing to establish the paternity of her 5-month-old daughter, despite the former senator's offer to participate in such a test.

In a statement provided to The Washington Post, Hunter said through her attorney that she will not be party to such a test "now or in the future."

The attorney, Robert Gordon, called Hunter a "private" person who is "not running for public office" and would not comment further.

"She wishes to maintain her privacy and her daughter's privacy," he said in the statement. "Furthermore, Rielle will not participate in DNA testing or any other invasion of her or her daughter's privacy now or in the future."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm...methinks she doth protest too much. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If she knows that Edwards didn't father the child - and won't do the test - she is
giving Murdoch and all the haters a gift. That keeps on giving.

I say Edwards for Attorney General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. They better not be able to force Edwards to pay anything w/o paternity established....
(Note that no "bond" has been established between Edwards and the tot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'll bet the money is already in the bank. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. She's been pulling in cash and has no visible means of
support, according to what I've read, including a three million dollar California home.

She's being taken "care" of with a promise of marriage after Elizabeth is buried.

Pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very odd. Will she clam it when accusing Edwards about being the daddy?
Not that I've kept much involved in this tabloid trash, except he claimed he wasn't daddy but drilled her anyway...

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't her family just come out an "Demand" a teat? What in hell is going on here?
is her family trying to get face time on Fox?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Better keep her soiled diapers under lock & key
Edited on Sat Aug-09-08 07:43 PM by SoCalDem
Nat'l Enquirer reporters are probably making deals with the trash men to "bag a diaper"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. her family should really stfu and stop trying to benefit from this. It sounds like they're
working on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. They had the nerve to say they were tired of her being
Edited on Sat Aug-09-08 08:08 PM by JeanGrey
"vilified" or something and demand a test. I guess they are of the Springer variety and believe if the baby's daddy is proven to be Edwards she'll look like a saint. (right................)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. methinks it is none of our damn business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yes especially when Edwards campaign money went to this woman
Me thinks you love corrupt politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. lol. i actually never really cared for edwards-

if you want a refund from the campaign, that is another issue.

the paternity of the kid makes no difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I repeat: Who cares. It's her child, her body and her personal matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Except for the $100 grand she was paid and the $15 grand a month
$100 grand for some youtube videos never used and $15 grand a month in hush money. We still don't know how much of the money outside the $100,000 came from campaign funds. Some of us gave thousands of dollars to that campaign so I wonder how you would feel if you thought some of your donated money might be going to a mistress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yeah, your donations trumps her rights.
Sorry, by bad.

How would I feel? Like I got duped and learned a good lesson. A lesson that, at this point, can't be proven beyond speculation of intent. Now, that said, if you think your funds went to a mistress, and that could be proven, I'd consult a lawyer and file suit. See how simple that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Actualy my concerns have nothing to do with her rights and paternity
She should do what she wants with regards to that. Its the campaign I am angry at, and I probably posted what I did in the wrong thread looking at its context more closely.

Yeah I do feel duped right now, mostly because I liked Edwards populist message. Now we need somebody who can take up that banner from him and continue with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. And I would be, as well.
I didn't donate to Edwards, as Kucinich was my choice. BUT, had I done so, I'd maybe have some issues with how money may have been spent and feel duped as you do, especially considering how wealthy Edwards is and how wealthy I'm not.

I think your anger at the campaign, if things are as they may seem, is well founded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which would suggest that she belives the kid's his.
Otherwise she'd have every reason to prove otherwise and get herself and the kid out of the public spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. oo ooo
maybe it is someone else more important...who is she covering for!!!

LOL..I don't care and can't wait till this feeding frenzy is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Not discussing it won't get it off the news any faster.
:shrug:

Sex scandals make for good ratings. As does speculation about paternity, as a million daytime talk show episodes would illustrate. Maybe they should go on Maury. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. ya I know it will
fade when the MSM says it can fade...I will look forward to that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Of course it's his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Shall we start the pool for the Playboy spread?
Two bets for how big the offer will be, and whether she accepts it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Have you seen her?
They'd be more likely to pay her to keep her clothes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. She's a dog compared to Elizabeth. Why do men do it?
They betray beautiful wives for a mistress that's a dog. I see it all the time..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Usually to prove that they still are desirable.
In his case, it might also be some sort of self-sabotage, because he had to know this would come out eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. How much does one charge for NOT taking a DNA test? Hmmmmm........
A goodly amount I would say. Quite "goodly."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not a bit surprised. But it's really not necessary, is it?
Does anyone truly buy it isn't his kid? She doesn't want to lose her gravy train.

It's out anyway I don't know why it is going on. Maybe he's afraid Elizabeth will take him to the cleaners because his career in politics is finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. This confirms it to me that Edwards is the father of that child
Rielle and the person who is allegedly the father of that child are both living in pretty upscale houses with no jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetblond Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Yep. Edwards is the dad. Hunter is EXTORTING money from him.
Edited on Sat Aug-09-08 08:36 PM by janetblond
It's called entrapment, fellas.
Take it from a girl who knows ....
"If I can't marry him, I'll have his baby".
She KNEW EXACTLY what she was doing.
She's 45 years old and unmarried. Why not?
If not Edwards, then who?
Women do this all the time. Especially when that time clock is ticking ... you're runnin' outta time.
No brainer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. Bravo for her! It's her body and her business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Oh give me a break.
If Edwards is not the father, why not take the test and clear it all up so he can be off the hook. Cause until she takes the test, you know full well the speculation will continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
33. "Ex-Lover"? What's he doing sneaking to her place at 2am if she's "ex"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC