Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh My..."Bloomberg News" reports Steve Job's Dead? Obituary? Hoax?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:08 PM
Original message
Oh My..."Bloomberg News" reports Steve Job's Dead? Obituary? Hoax?


By Caroline McCarthy, CNETThu Aug 28, 8:24 AM ET

An electronic gaffe at news outlet Bloomberg mistakenly sent an incomplete obituary for Apple CEO Steve Jobs over the wire on Wednesday afternoon, and a tipster promptly sent the soon-retracted file to gossip blog Gawker.

The lengthy file contains not only a preliminary obituary for the iconic Apple chief, but also a list of suggested contacts for a more extensive story--Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, and early Apple evangelist Guy Kawasaki, among others.

The summary of Jobs' accomplishments, per the obituary, is that he "helped make personal computers as easy to use as telephones, changed the way animated films are made, persuaded consumers to tune into digital music, and refashioned the mobile phone."

It's not out of the ordinary at all that Bloomberg would have this written; all major news outlets have notable persons' obituaries prepared in advance so that only minor changes need be made at the actual time of death. That way, the news can be reported almost immediately and can be updated with further detail.

But a Jobs obituary, however premature, is more chilling than, say, a Bill Gates obituary. The Apple CEO successfully battled pancreatic cancer earlier this decade, and a magazine profile indicated that he had kept it secret for nine months while researching alternative treatments--a questionable move for any chief executive of a publicly traded company, but especially one as crucial to the runnings of the business as Jobs is.

When Jobs appeared onstage at the Worldwide Developers Conference in June 2008, his thin appearance led some bloggers and company critics to speculate that he was ill again, and some of them pushed the bounds of decency in demanding that Apple reveal the state of the executive's health to shareholders.

So given a CEO whose health has been discussed so speculatively in the echo chamber of the blogosphere, and whose company's stock has been shown to be far from immune to the influence of the rumor mill, the appearance--however brief--of a Jobs obituary online must certainly have been disquieting for those who stumbled upon it.

Bloomberg released a retraction later on Wednesday that made only the vaguest of reference to the content of the gaffe. "An incomplete story referencing Apple Inc. was inadvertently published by Bloomberg News at 4:27 p.m. New York time today," the retraction read. "The item was never meant for publication and has been retracted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. How could this even happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's happened before. IIRC, they did it to the comedian who did you yogurt pop commercials.
His name temporarily evades me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And Mikey. Don't forget Mikey. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That was an Urban Legend, not an official release of his obituary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Says you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I'm too tired to go to Snopes. You do it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Crap McCorporate Media who loves Gates and want's APPLE to DIE!
What else could explain a "FU*K Up" of this proportion? Lies and disinfo...that hurts people for what reason? Just to PUMP STOCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a stupid mistake
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's getting better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm not dead yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. "Shut up, you'll be stone dead in a moment"
"I want to go for a walk"

"You're not foolin' anyone, you know."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Someone at Bloomberg was probably shorting Apple
This is pure "How Now Dow Jones."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You probably have the truth of it. This is a Market for "Traders" not "Investors."
What does that mean for all of us who aren't TRADERS for our Savings? No matter how young or old, one is...our Stock Market and Investments are being "GAMED." Shouldn't someone be held Accountable for THIS? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. They keep files on everybody famous so they have something to publish
if somebody dies. I imagine that somebody was updating the file and accidently released it. Or, somebody hacked the bloomberg site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. IIRC, New York Times once accidentally put all their obituaries where you could find them on Google.
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 07:15 PM by IanDB1
And famous people were all able to see their obituaries before they died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC