Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today, the Election Debate has Turned to Issues

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 04:20 PM
Original message
Today, the Election Debate has Turned to Issues
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 04:22 PM by louis c
I take no satisfaction in the banking failures or in the stock market collapse today. Although it seemed inevitable to me at some point in time, since the policy of deregulation always brings about an economic disaster, (ie. Great Depression 1929, S&L crisis of 1988 and the Mortgage meltdown of today). I had to hold many a hand today as 401K accounts plunged under my members feet. I know the people most hurt are many of our friends.

The silver lining in all this will be that the average American voter (who I have consistently maintained has a deep lack of knowledge when they vote) will be more inclined to pay attention to important issues, like the economy. Before you flame me, Average to me means the 50.1% that cost us these elections, especially the middle class voter who votes Republican. It doesn't mean everyone in America who takes a ballot.

Now, it's up to the Obama campaign to take advantage of this situation.

My suggestion is to pin the blame on Phil Gramm, linking him to McCain and Bush, as they deregulated a banking industry that was safe and secure until the Republicans tampered with it. Allude to the S&L crisis, saying that that should have taught us a lesson when the Republicans caused that crisis through deregulation.

Hang the economy around the neck of John McCain in ads, speeches and surrogates.
That's what I think today, what's your thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Senate vote:
53 repukes, 1 Dem for.

Split right down party lines. That is all you need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ive telling that one all day
But inform me. Did President Clinton have to sign that bill? Wasn't in 1999? fill me in on details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That was one of Clinton's...
More repuke moments. Of course, some will say that he was, by that time, thouroughly whipped by the repukes, but no, he did not have to sign that piece of trash. Unless, of course, there was some sort of quid pro quo going on behind the scenes: he signs it and they back off in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ya, that's the bad part
I'm no Clinton fan. Any Democrat for President is better than any Republican. But he really die screw us with NAFTA and GAT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why has the Keating Five not been discussed in the media?
Would somebody clue me in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC