|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:39 PM Original message |
How long would it take to count 1,250,000,000,000 dollars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. I hate math. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Don't be hatin' on math. Math don't hate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Trig! (?) ain't no thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Honey, it's not how long it takes, it's who you trust to do the counting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Honey, Like being called honey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Count it? Hell, you probably couldn't even spend it in that time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Amazing, isn't it. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. If it were all in single dollar bills... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Lots longer than that. Over 39,610 years. That's almost 20 times longer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. You used 365.25 and I used 365, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Slacker, taking leap-day off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Yup. I probably should have used 365.24, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Either way, we're talking the very beginning of the Upper Paleolithic period... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. In other words, they'd have to start counting before 'counting' was invented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. ... and those pictures of George Washington would've been VERY confusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. I get 39637 years...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. If I'm off by that much that makes it 20 times worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
14. Now imagine it's all in pennies! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Now my head just spun all the way around. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. 1 year = 31,556,926 seconds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. 39,610 years! Unpossible, the Earth is only 6,000 years old! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I got the one year right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC