Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: Attempts to limit excecutive compensation could impede critically needed legislation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:39 PM
Original message
Bush: Attempts to limit excecutive compensation could impede critically needed legislation


Bush urged Congress to move fast on the $700 billion bailout package for Wall Street. Democratic lawmakers urged caution, citing warrantless wiretapping as an example of what happens when a bill is passed in haste. Below is an excerpt on Bush's statement regarding the rescue plan. Underneath the excerpt is a quote from Senator Leahy, comparing Bush's urgency today with his push to pass the Patriot Act, legislation that has been criticized for giving the government enhanced powers to spy on the public.

From The Washington Post:

President Bush this morning warned lawmakers against trying to make too many changes to the proposed financial bailout legislation, saying the plan needs to be passed quickly and relatively intact to stem damage to global financial markets.

Weekend negotiations "made good headway" in crafting a bill to bolster a system weighed down by problem home mortgages, Bush said. But with proposals circulating to include provisions for homeowners in the bill or to use it to limit executive compensation, Bush cautioned that too many added provisions could impede approval of critically needed legislation.

Patrick Leahy on the bailout package:

"We will do something this week -- but if we learned anything from right after 9/11, it's that the biggest mistake is to pass anything they ask for just because it's an emergency," Leahy says.

The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman knows of what he speaks. He sponsored the original Patriot Act, only to feel betrayed later when the Bush administration used it to justify domestic wiretapping.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/22/bush-pushes-to-pass-bailo_n_128314.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. May I be the first to say...
YOU SICK MOTHERFUCKER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I hear ya...
...I actually went back and read the article a couple of extra times to make sure I wasn't taking his comments out of context. Sadly, I wasn't.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fine. We can wait.
This stubborn asshole needs to be taught who's in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. It way past time for this congress to put this little pseudo pig farmer in his place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let the whole thing fail. How much worse can it get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. well tough fucking shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is why you don't put the loser in the White House...
...or maintain corrupt voting machines to keep him there! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. now is the time to slap this MF'er down.
I am not talking about Senator Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I wish Patrick Leahy had learned not to give Bush anything in a rush...
...instead of just not to give Bush exactly what he asked for in a rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wait until the next president.
Stocks go up and down. Don't prop up corporations which made bad investments.

We will have economic problems to address in January regardless.

Congress should wait for the proposals of the next president, and then slowly and carefully decide what to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. FUCK YOU BUSH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You took the words literally out of my mouth
That was the first thing I said as I read this.

SOB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. My thought, exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. The talk of a con man. "I need it NOW or ELSE!"
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 01:46 PM by sparosnare
Not this time Bush; not this time. We can wait and you can squirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. You've seen "Fargo," right?
This is nothing more than Jerry Lundegaard pressuring his father-in-law for "investment money." The father in law wants all of the facts and figures, and has no interest in throwing his money into something that won't return it tenfold.

Jerry tries to make him feel guilty, saying that the investment would be "real good for Jean and Scottie" (his wife and son)

The father-in-law pauses, looks out of the corner of his eye, and mutters that "Jean and Scottie never have to worry."

Jerry continues whining about the money. Then he has his wife kidnapped. Jerry Lundegaard, meet George W. Bush.

Bush is trying to use a little 9/11-style fear mongering to get the money, now, before any questions are asked.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Bring on the wood chipper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Yep - great analogy.
We're just supposed to hand over 700 bil (probably much more) to a known liar, no questions asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh well.
Like it or lump it, George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. GFY you flaming asshole
nobody cares what you think anymore, except the 19 percenter freeptards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. And the 19 percenters aren't half as committed as they once were...
...just like they didn't want McCain, but are "energized" over Palin, so they pretend that he's their man.

Must suck to be on a losing team that has lost in EPIC proportions. A Connecticut frat boy masquerading as a long, tall, ornery & mean rootin' tootin' Texas cowboy, who shivered and cowered in a Florida classroom while our country was under attack.

And yet, the 19% held on for dear life and pretended.

It's getting harder and harder to pretend every day, I'll wager.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarbirdForObama Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Screw What that giggling Murder Wants
This is His Fault.

If he offers to resign immediatly, surrender to Law Enforcement, and submit himself for Trial, I'll consider fast tracking the bail out.

Fuck Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. First put the Social Security Trust in a lock box because that is where the little pecker wants the
bail out to come from, or at least part of it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. All it will impede, you vile wart on the ass of humanity, is the responsible being rewarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. F.U Bush. Why would we heed the advice of a thug who is complicit
in wrecking America permanently? If our justice system was anywhere close to being functional, you and your buddies would already be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's nice to see that the priorities of the Republican party never change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bush, the "critically need legislation" is your impeachment, followed
by your imprisonment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC