Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The sky is falling!!! "Stocks JUMP After Biggest Sell off in Years"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:32 PM
Original message
The sky is falling!!! "Stocks JUMP After Biggest Sell off in Years"
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 12:33 PM by autorank
Memo to the Corporate Elite: You never imagined that your greatest scheme would fail.

Aren't the people suckers, you said to each other. We'll take them down for everything.

But then the sky didn't fall, the wolf didn't appear.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3683270/

Your lies and scare tactics have ended. The people said no and made that no a reality.

Thanks to all of us, this great rip off - "Grand Theft America" - was prevented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most analysts don't believe we've seen a bottom yet
Yesterday broke through technical support so it's likely that we won't be setting any records soon. But the rebound is a sign of confidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I expected the market decline long before this mess
and have made plans accordingly. Whether the bail out as presented yesterday, or any other bail out occurs, I still expect a mkt downturn beyond what we have currently seen.

real estate prices will also, imo, continue correcting downward for terribly overinflated markets - no matter what.

Of course, I may be wrong, but I am basing my plans for my life on the belief that we will face a recession no matter what because that is the result of the Bush economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
49. The chart for the DOW the past 12-14 months tells the story.
We are in a major decline, just like we all knew. But now, they're trying to convince us that this one is really, really worse than the downturn of the late 80s, IF we don't fork over the blank check to Bush's hack.

I don't know how any intelligent observer of the markets would conclude anything other than "this market is headed to 10K or less."

When it drops from 14K, to 13K, to 12K, to 11K, you don't need a sign from God to know it's on its way down. These hurricanes mean huge demands on insurers. The markets are overleveraged, and the biggest companies are among the worst offenders.

In every downturn, the companies that have been inefficient get eaten by the wolves and shit over a cliff. That's how it goes for those whose fundamental business plans are bad. They didn't plan well, they risked too much, and now Bruno and Rocko want their money. Failure is earned, just like success. Let it happen.

There's a bailout plan available to these companies. It's called Chapter 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. It's not so much a sign of confidence, as it was a ponzi scheme to begin with.
I said in a post yesterday that there was going to be a really good buying opportunity for the market after yesterday's drop. I think it will bounce around some more, and the next couple of weeks will see some serious shaking out.

But by Halloween??? Every goblin you know will be ready to get into the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
47. Here's what was in the bill defeated - 100 pages of weasel words
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 01:18 AM by autorank
I read the whole thing. There was more wrong with it than this but this jumped out. What a confidence killer - the people get screwed again. There should be some rational approach to this but this bill was hardly that:
Concerns about Proposed Bailout Bill
The original bailout proposed by the White House gave the Secretary of the Treasury unlimited discretion in doling out $700 billion and barred any Congressional or judicial review. The new legislation calls for "consultation" with the following entities. Please note that not one of those to be consulted is an elected official and that Congress is out of the loop.
"(b) CONSULTATION.—In exercising the authority under this section, the Secretary shall consult with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Corporation, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development." Title I, Sec 101, (b) "Consultation" page 7, lines 18-23 and pages 15, lines 23-24, and page 16, lines 1-9.

The people get involved in the decision making process, presuming Congress is listening. Sec.115. Graduated Authorization to Purchase (pages 40 - 49) provides an option to overrule any particular bailout. Congress has 15 days after a purchase notice by Treasury to introduce a joint resolution disapproving of the bill. The resolution has a tight window to passage, three days, and is subject to a presidential veto. The "fast track" aspects of this guarantee the same types of hurried votes characterized by a majority of members failing to even read a proposed bill (e.g., The Patriot Act).

The bill requires that the Secretary of the Treasury report to Congress no more than seven days after a commitment to purchase a failed financial institution or at $50 billion dollar disbursement intervals. Title 1, Sec. 105, Reports, (b) Tranche Reports to Congress, (b) Timing, page 19, lines 7-24 and page 20, lines 1-10. The only direct option Congress has is the above mentioned "Joint Resolution of Disapproval."

The bill addresses overpayment for troubled firms with the intent of preventing "unjust enrichment." This is done "by preventing the sale of a troubled asset to the Secretary at a higher price than what the seller paid to purchase the asset." Title I, Sec 101, (e) Unjust Enrichment, page 9, lines 15-18.

What if the price the seller paid for the asset was an inflated home price in a down real estate market at the time of a bailout? By paying higher than market value prices, not limited by the bill, "enrichment" would be guaranteed.

Even if that there were a real prohibition that failed firms not make out under this bill, there is an open gate to enrichment, firms in "conservatorship or receivership."
"This subsection does not apply to troubled assets acquired in a merger or acquisition, or a purchase of as sets from a financial institution in conservatorship or receivership, or that has initiated bankruptcy proceedings under title 11, United States Code." Title I, Sec 101, (d), page 9, lines 18-23.

Thus, there can be what would be considered "unjust enrichment" if a firm just declares Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

How long will it be before people compare this generous bankruptcy provision for billion dollar firms with the draconian bankruptcy reform bill passed by Congress in 2005?
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0809/S00376.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know it was over a year between stock market crash
of 1929 and bread lines, right?

And even the market crash then (which had much less control than now) didn't happen in just one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. But we won't have a Hoover in place who would not do really
what is needed. We just need to get to next February. Stopping the war will help a lot of the money drain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Things actually got better!
in 1930 the market got back up to early 1929 levels, though not September 1929 levels, credit was available, and interest rates low. Things tanked though and didn't reach bottom till March 1933. Three and a half years after the crash itself.

We're in for a long hard road. How hard and long is still up in the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. If I were psychic, I'd tell you about 12 months out. There's a problem, this isn't the fix
They're afraid to even hold a few days of hearings, to get the 200 economists a chance to speak out, the ones who oppose this, to let small business people who hate this come forward and speak, to examine Paulson's favored treatment of his old firm, Goldman, by bailing out AIG which owed Goldman $20 billion.

It's a scam. One thing for sure, what Bush proposes and Congress passes without hearings or real debate is assuredly an insider deal. We will not benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. They have not "bounced back" - they have not even regained half of what they lost yesterday
That is not a rebound, it is a rebound when they regain what they have lost, not when they have come back up what they lost yesterday in less than 10 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. And it would be stupid to expect them to. That's what 'correction' means. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, that's right
The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

Oh, wait. No it isn't.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's just a 'fire sale'... bargain basement prices.....
we all are not out of the woods yet though. I was glad to hear that the DOW went up 270+ points by noon today. Chicken Little wasn't completely right after all but it IS beginning to rain on Main St. and we don't need more people out of work right now. Congress still needs to take action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. So why did Wall Street need a $700 billion bailout? Maybe it is a rescue
...but from what? $700 billion to line the pockets of Bush, Cheney, Paulson, Bernancke and McCain to use to rescue their own bank accounts and stock trade gambles, hum-mm, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. The Fed dumped 630B into "liquidity" BEFORE the vote.
Explain to me again what the additional 700B was for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. did you even read that article?
"The rise in stocks wasn't unexpected as carnage on Wall Street often attracts bargain hunters, though questions remain about how investors will proceed. Without a bailout plan in place to absorb soured mortgage debt and other bad loans from banks' balance sheets, investors are wondering what might restore confidence in lending."

"Major stock indexes were almost a sideshow during the session, with the credit markets as the main event. A key rate that banks charge to lend to one another shot higher, a tightening of the availability of credit that could cascade through the economy."

"Though the blue-chip index rose more than 250 points at midday, the main worry for traders is that a lack of a plan will make it nearly impossible for some companies to fund basic operations like making payroll. Participants in the credit market buy and sell debt that companies use to finance operations."


Just wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chupacabranation Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I know.
I work for a small business and I can guarantee there'll be a day when I'm not paid.

There is definitely some looney-tunes optimism going around.

I wish I could have what they're having.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. I own a small business
It's definately a worry. We've never had to resort to paying payroll on our credit line, but if other companies default on their debt to us, or just take a long time to pay we'd need to. If we're not paid the money we're owed by other companies this month, we would need that line of credit to make payroll at the end of October. The key word in all this is cascade. One company can't pay it's debts, and it cascades down the line till millions of people lose their eyes in a heartbeat.

Ever watch that show Kitchen Nightmares? most of those troubled restaurants are in debt. A quarter million, a half a million. Lose that credit and all those close. Sure some are risky businesses that SHOULD fail, but there are plenty of small businesses that are sound, but their health and the health of bad businesses are all intertwined, and many healthy small businesses for their starting periods RELY on that credit to get off the ground.

That dries up, cascades down, we're looking at serious serious problems. People need to stop looking at what the DOW is doing and focus on the actual issue here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chupacabranation Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Agreed.
I think there's so much of a focus on 'making people get their come-uppance' that they don't realize theirs is coming with the quickness.

Just goes to show that people enjoy 'trouncing' whatever imagined opponent over a reasoned review of the actual contingencies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
53. People just aren't getting it
My boss is in the same position as you are.

People are angry at wall street and refuse to even listen. They just want "them to pay".

The reality is that in the long run we, as taxpayers, stand to see a profit from this buyout, yet if we do nothing, many businesses will close for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
38. I read the article and I read the bill, in some detail
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 12:54 AM by autorank
From the article: "At the close, the Dow rose 485.21, or 4.68 percent, to 10,850.66 after falling nearly 7 percent on Monday to its lowest close in nearly three years. It was the largest point drop and 17th largest percentage drop in the blue chip index. The percentage decline was far less severe than the 20-plus-percent drops seen in the stock market crash of October 1987 and before the Great Depression."

Tight credit is a problem. That doesn't mean you give a bunch of failures $700 billion at the discretion of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Paulson was CEO of Goldman. AIG owed Goldman $20 billion. Paulson bailed out AIG. The NYT elaborated: "there was also a separate meeting on Monday (Sept. 15) to discuss financial aid for A.I.G. Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, was the only Wall Street chief executive who attended the Monday meeting."

"As the group, led by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., pondered the collapse of one of America’s oldest investment banks, Lehman Brothers, a more dangerous threat emerged: American International Group, the world’s largest insurer, was teetering. A.I.G. needed billions of dollars to right itself and had suddenly begged for help.

"One of the Wall Street chief executives participating in the meeting was Lloyd C. Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, Mr. Paulson’s former firm. Mr. Blankfein had particular reason for concern.

"Although it was not widely known, Goldman, a Wall Street stalwart that had seemed immune to its rivals’ woes, was A.I.G.’s largest trading partner, according to six people close to the insurer who requested anonymity because of confidentiality agreements. A collapse of the insurer threatened to leave a hole of as much as $20 billion in Goldman’s side, several of these people said." http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/business/28melt.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin


You think these folks are out to help you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #38
50. By quoting the Dow you're showing you don't get it
Looking at the Dow in this situation is like talking about the wind, without considering the hurricane.

To answer your question, no. I don't think they're out there to help me. I think they're out there to help themselves. That doesn't mean that their interests and mine (and yours) can't align.

Hopefully we'll see action this week, but every week we don't have a solution more banks are gonna drop, and less credit will be available till small businesses start closing across the country. The Wall Street / Main Street thing is accurate. If we don't give Wall Street money, then you're going to start seeing 'closed' signs alot more on Main Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Within 10 minutes of close yesterday, the DOW dropped over 400 points. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Some day traders gotta be diggin' this.
These huge swings can make a day trader some big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
39. And good for them.
That's intense work - even for those math people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Back to gambling as usual.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
46. Legalized gambling. But now we know it's with our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. My opinion is that the markets will rebound when we have
an acceptable bailout plan. The lesson to be learned here is not to rush into a hasty plan because of the fear mongering. We need to take our time to come up with a plan that is a cure, not a band aid, and when that happens the markets will come back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Infusion of Massive Federal& European Loans to banks didn't hurt either

Pay Attention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Visiting Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Um, that did nothing to ease the credit crunch
Infusions of pretend money never do. Nothing is in place to ease the massive debt burden U.S. households are under.

700B. 3T. Don't mean shit.

This is all smoke and mirror trading now until there is a resolution.

China.

Dollar swapping.

Pay attention! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. It temporarily pimps the market for a day! Welcome to DU but
you didn't understand my post. I have been recording the loans
and the results on the market since August of 2007 when they started.

Smoke and mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. One day here, one day there does not a trend make
This is not the way we look at our future - the next big bank failure could rupture the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. I hope you're right n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. They profit from selling the stock yesterday, and then turn around and buy it back at a bargain.
So have got to profit twice from their seedy manipulations.

This is a failure for the Corporate Elite how again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ain't that somethin'?
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 12:49 PM by seemslikeadream
:hi:


quel surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's not over yet. If the rescue doesn't pass I hope I have to eat crow,
but if it doesn't I fear I may have to eat crow to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
41. We're not deer looking in the headlights anymore
The rejection of this lousy bill is a watershed for public efforts. It was across the board, not left or right, just pissed off people having heard enough lies. Remember the Patriot Act - passed in a crisis. Other acts as well.

Congress can have some hearings for a change, also examine Paulson's behavior helping the firm he formerly headed as CEO by bailing out AIG, which owed his former firm, Goldman Sachs, $20 billion.

Amazing stuff.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0809/S00376.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. Surprise, surprise!
as Gomer Pyle used to say.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. It went down 777 yesterday..Now it has gained back 333.
That leaves us still down 444 since yesterday morning.

Your huge bounce is not even half a recovery...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. It's listred as a "JUMP" but what difference - they wenet down

Largest point gains for Dow

#3 all time:

Sept. 30, 2008---10,850.66---485.21

That's not half bad considering the poisoned by those who would benefit from the bailout.

There is corrective action needed but not the type that's rushed. This is Patriot Act legislation,
rush through it and just shove it down our throats.

I read the bill in detail and it stunk, everything for them, little to nothing for the people.

It looked good until you read it closely then it stunk up the place.

They need to take their time and do it right. Henry Paulson does not get to become the finance
guy for all of us.

In fact he should resign, considering that he did the Goldman deal with the Goldman CEO in the room
(NYT story).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. The. crisis. is. not. about. the. stock. market.

The stock market fluctuations are a symptom, not a cause.


The credit freeze is the crisis. That is what must be solved.


What the Dow is at during any particular period is immaterial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It is not fair to confuse people with facts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. You've been posting really well
Keep it up. People just don't understand what's going on and it's good to keep hammering home that the real problem is in credit and commercial paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. Some of the posters remind me of the anti-vaccination crusaders
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 12:58 AM by depakid
No matter what evidence you show them that vaccines are safe, efective and necessary- they persist in irrational beliefs and conspiracy theories.

Indeed, presenting them with credible and relevant information only seems to make them dig in that much deeper.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #40
54. One flamewar per thread, please
Let's not attract them out of their dungeon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. Who said it was the crisis - as a symptom, it's not behaving according to BushCo logic
We were led to believe that this was doomsday. The market would have reflected that. It wasn't.

On credit, here's what business folks are saying, particularly the person from AMS:

"The way the bailout has been sold to the general population, including small businesses, is that you are going to perish if you don't get this through and your credit is going to dry up overnight," said George Cloutier, who is founder and chairman of American Management Services, which consults for small businesses. "We talk to . . . small business owners on the phone every day. And I think the most important thing that we are hearing is they hate the concept of the bailout. They feel that Wall Street is being given a free ride." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/30/AR2008093002922.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=AR

We're all facing punishment as a result of the errors of the people who created the crisis but they get $700 billion. It makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidan Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. the problem... ?
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 01:30 PM by Poseidan
Is lending the entire problem? If so, couldn't the government itself simply provide loans and credit? Interest makes it so eventually, the tax-payers funding the system would turn a profit (meaning, taxes would be lower).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
42. It's the problem that screws the middle class, small/medium sized business
So why not make credit available? It would mean they might have to hold hearings and it might then
mean that they can't dole out $700 billion in corporate welfare. That's where it's at.

Lets see who gave to those who voted yes. It's out there but I don't have the link. Your guess is
probably correct.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. You know what this reminds me of?
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 06:24 PM by marekjed
I'm not much of an anthropologist, but somewhere in the collective consciousness gleaned from history books and the Discovery channel, there's the idea of a village magus, sorcerer or later a high priest, who would chastise his people (they were typically males, weren't they?) and demand all sorts of offerings and sacrifices under penalty of gods' wrath. And people gave, because they were frightened. And after they gave, the earth did not shake, the rain did not fall for three years straight, the volcano stayed dormant, and the lightning did not incinerate the village. And the people thought: It works! And the next time they brought even more offerings and made harsher sacrifices to appease the frightful powers. And the offerings worked again. And so it went.

How are CDOs and MBS-es, futures and derivatives different from high magic of the bygone time? From where I stand, they aren't. Unknown, powerful forces deal with them, and there is no telling what consequences may befall us.

Sometimes you just have to call their bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
48. that's spot on
(like many have said, wish you could rec an individual post.)

Oooga-booga!

Supreme court must select shrub or our country is doomed. DON'T THINK, ACT!

Oooga-booga!

We must abandon most protections from being a police state (part 1) or the terrorists have won. DON'T THINK, ACT!

Oooga-booga!

We must attack Iraq before they can attack us. DON'T THINK, ACT!

Oooga-booga!

We must abandon most protections from being a police state (Part 2) and protect the corporations who violated the laws we forgot to rescind in part 1. DON'T THINK, ACT!

Oooga-booga!

There's some stuff we would like to steal before we get thrown out on on assess in November. Gimmee. DON'T THINK, ACT!

-------

Now we wake up a bit, eh, 33 days to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
36. I'm afraid you have spoken too soon.....breaking news is that
they will be voting on the bill again tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
45. The irony is that Republicans used to send me this same caption.
I have been a member of DU since 2004 because "I thought" we did better research and were more informed.

And Autorank, I always respected you as one of those who did their homework.

In this case, You did not. I am very disappointed.

Let me repeat I AM VERY DISAPPOINTED.

Autorank, you of all people need to do some research. All is NOT what it seems. Do some research. I know you know how to research, because you have proven it time and time again. Drop your bias and preconceptions, and look at this issue logically.

Then get back to us. Ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
51. Your jump was no real jump- if was a half hearted adjustment
It went down 777 then up 485. Still a 292 loss. No small loss.

Now it is down another 180.

Where it will end tonight, no one knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Dead cat bounce. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC