Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin v. Couric on Roe v. Wade (incredible)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:25 PM
Original message
Palin v. Couric on Roe v. Wade (incredible)
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 06:26 PM by LiberalHeart
Q: "Do you think there's an inherent right to privacy in the Constituion?"

A: "I do."

Q: "That's the cornerstone of Roe versus Wade."

A: (Nodding) "I do. And I believe that individual states can best handle what people within the constituencies within the 50 states would like to see their will ushered in in an issue like that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. How unfair!!!
A gotcha question!!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A real "gotcha", eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because, as we all know...
conservatives are staunch supporters of the right to privacy, except when they don't!

(Like abortion, email, telephone calls, etc)

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Conservatives are staunch supporters of THEIR rights, as long as...
Nobody else, except their conservative comrades, is entitled to or afforded THEIR rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Crackhead or tweaker?
"I do. And I believe that individual states can best handle what people within
the constituencies within the 50 states would like to see their will ushered
in in an issue like that."


As already posted on DU speaks in a "word salad."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. That's not word salad, that's word vegomatic
Completely diced and sliced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morillon Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good lord.
As a writer and a grammar freak, I can't stand the way this woman phrases her thoughts. It makes my head hurt.

And on the facts themselves? This dumbass is ten shades of wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can play that one too, I believe everyone is equal but each state
should be able to determine whether we can own people or not..:crazy: I want to own a Canadian. they always make me laugh...Aaaa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. My IQ just lost another point or two.
Ye gods that's painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, the States can decide whether to ignore the Constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That Because ... "I am a Federalist."
she said that or something close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. ???????????????????
And I believe

that individual states

can best handle

what people within the constituencies

within the 50 states

would like to see their will

ushered in in an issue like that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. OMFG
Is that a direct quote? :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yep. I transcribed it from the tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. When I was a Vermonter, I didn't worry about giving states more control.
As as transplant in the good ole boy south, the idea scares the hell out of me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Palin's English skills are an abortion!
Good god where did she learn to talk? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. And tomorrow we can to hear her brilliant response regarding the worst thing VP Cheney has done.
"Shoot his friend".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebecca_herman Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ugh
My eyes hurt trying to read that sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. which means she DOES want that 12 year old girl who was raped to be forced to give birth
because that is the logical conclusion. she is personally against choice, and if she could personally vote to make abortion illegal, she would.

she already thinks that morning after pills are the equivalent of an abortion.

That woman is a danger to other women.

The good news is that women see this and they have already left the republican campaign in droves. She has COST McCain female voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC