Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Under Iraq troop pact, U.S. can't leave any forces behind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:25 PM
Original message
Under Iraq troop pact, U.S. can't leave any forces behind
Under Iraq troop pact, U.S. can't leave any forces behind

By Leila Fadel | McClatchy Newspapers


BAGHDAD — The status of forces of agreement between the United States and Iraq is now called the withdrawal agreement, and that's exactly what it is: an ultimate end to the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq.

If Iraq's parliament endorses the agreement, in six weeks American forces would have to change the way they operate in Iraq, and all U.S. combat troops, police trainers and military advisers would have to leave the country by Dec. 31, 2011. President-elect Barack Obama's campaign plan to leave a residual force of some 30,000 American troops in Iraq would be impossible under the pact.

Unless the agreement is amended, which would require the formal written approval of both sides, in three years there no longer would be any legal basis for U.S. armed forces or civilian contractors of the Department of Defense to remain in Iraq.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/56110.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks - I thought that's what I heard on Air America earlier but wasn't sure. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Plans for withdrawal are being drawn up, too. I'm thrilled!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inexpensive Wino Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, that went really well, did it not?
Hail fellow, well met.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is there any down side to this? It seems to me that it means we can
get the hell out of there, and te Iraqis that signed off on this take responsibility for what happerns after. I like it, let's do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I LOVE it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC