Screw larry king. ""do you see any connection between the attack in India, and our election"

[still_one]

I was waiting for some ass in the MSM to ask that, in order to imply who knows what

How about this larry dumb ass, maybe their was a connection because the current administration attacked Iraq based on a lie, instead of going after where AQ was you idiot

[navarth]

1. oh you're kidding. did he really?

jeezuz. what a stupid fucking thing to say.

you're right. fuck Larry King.

[still_one]

3. no I am not kidding, he asked that question of Christine Amampor(sic). She said

there was no way to tell, and even that isn't an adequate response

[OnceUponTimeOnTheNet]

7. I missed his questions, but every time I see Amanpour on the bar, I take it off mute.

I missed this one. Damn.

[still_one]

11. I don't think Amanpour was ready for his inane question /nt

[OnceUponTimeOnTheNet]

16. She is too intelligent to interact easily with King types.

[madeline_con]

2. "Do you see any connection between a skeleton and Larry?"

"Why yes, Dick, now that you mention it. Larry consistently delivers a very skeletal performance!"

[still_one]

4. Actually, a skeleton asks more relevant questions /nt

[mondo joe]

5. I hate to have "fuck" and "Larry King" in my brain at the same time, thanks. NT

[still_one]

10. Sorry, but it made me quite angry the implication he was trying to paint /nt

[SammyWinstonJack]

44. .

:evilgrin:

[Trajan]

6. No Larry ... but ...

I see a connection between your discussion and a million toilets flushing ....

[JuniperLea]

8. No, Larry, only bigots can see that connection...

To the rest of us, the emperor has no clothes.

[lindbergh]

21. No, only bigots would SUPPORT that connection. A very different thing from

OBSERVING it. Jesus, this place is full of morons.

[JuniperLea]

22. Yeah, dumbass...

You should leave and lighten the load.

:eyes:

You need to rethink that, because you're wrong. Wrongo...

[lindbergh]

24. How ironic you have a desecrated Peace Sign there.

sigh...

[JuniperLea]

29. How ironic you have no clue what you're talking about

Just another internet gadfly causing trouble... trying to stir shit... have you made one non-insulting post in all of your 32? I'm betting no.

[lindbergh]

38. Yes, I have but not to you.

:D

[Kire]

9. the attack in India, the Somalian pirates, increased Aryan and KKK group activity to highest levels

ever?

I see a connection.

Do you want to fight?

[Ichingcarpenter]

15. The loss of the Nasa Toolbag is also a clear sign

that they are all tied together in one huge conspiracy

[Kire]

54. I see a connection between the death of Kurt Cobain and...

...the rise of Newt Gingrich in 1994. Don't you?

[lindbergh]

12. I'm no fan of L. King but why isn't it a legitimate question?

There are crazy motherfuckers in our OWN country who have threatened our incoming President...is it beyond imagination that nutcases in Asia might have "agendas" based on the outcome of our election?

[Ichingcarpenter]

14. You really get better with every post don't you?

Your leaps of logic are astounding

[lindbergh]

18. You found a leap of logic in a question? That is amazing.

But what the hell...explain it to me: is it beyond comprehension that some foreign elements are using our election result to foment disturbances? If not, why not?

[Ichingcarpenter]

23. How does our election tie to India's Problems and that terrorist act?

What do you know about India's problems?

[Name removed]

27. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[JuniperLea]

30. No, you're the only one

Which would explain why you are so lonely.

[lindbergh]

32. Lonely? Not in your wildest wet dreams, sweetie.

:D

[JuniperLea]

33. I'm not talking about your dollie in the corner...

Sicko

[lindbergh]

37. Awww, you're cute when you fling poo anonymously from that basement cubicle.

Makes you feel impo'tent, don't it?

[JuniperLea]

45. Oh, stop projecting... eom

[Ichingcarpenter]

34. 'I don't know a FUCKING THING' so you are like Larry King?

How revealing

Look just do a google search on India and terrorist attacks
they have quite a history and it has to do with internal and border problems
not the US.

[lindbergh]

36. Perhaps it has not occured to you that not every person in the world has the extensive knowledge

on this subject that you obviously do. One wonders if you consider it advantageous to keep them ignorant...like the Catholic Church used to do a few hundred years ago.

[Ichingcarpenter]

39. Then don't make ignorant insulting blanket statements

Listen Kid........ You need to try a little humility....."Trust me" before you
sprout off on this forum with just 30 posts.

[lindbergh]

41. Mea culpa. I forgot that some people here started out with a thousand posts.

(Why does that remind me of Bush being born on 3rd base thinking he hit a triple?)

[Kire]

47. the hostages they are taking are US citizens

why are you arguing with such certainty that you are the only one who knows what you are talking about?

[Name removed]

17. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Trajan]

25. I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt ....

But there is no actual evidence that violence that has been occurring for centuries is now suddenly 'caused' by a new US President being elected ... One that has promoted a moderate policy towards Muslims ...

While I can believe that their agenda would include attacks in places they have already attacked, there is no proof of a direct correlation between those acts and the US election .... It is speculative ...

[still_one]

28. exactly, and an election where that candidate hasn't officially become president

puts emphasis on that point even more

It is more likely the actions of the current administration that helped provide the environment for hatred against the west

[Kire]

49. da nile

ain't just a river in Egypt

[Kire]

48. the hostages they are taking are US citizens

"no actual evidence" - do you know the lead investigator in the case? Is the trial over?

[still_one]

26. Several reasons. The first is the implication that because obama won that is why it happened

This is what came constantly from the republicans that Obama's inexperience would invite an attack

The second reason is because of the thought process that king is portraying that the world revolves around US. Why would our election have ANYTHING to do with with that attack?

As I said previously, it is more likely due to the actions of the bush administration attacking Iraq which had NOTHING to do with 9/11

[lindbergh]

31. Well, much of what happens in the world IS a result of our own actions.

Isn't that one of our main points to explain 9/11? I don't mean the 'official version', but how we are -perceived- around the world. I have no idea what triggers the crazies in Asia...if you do, there's probably a spot in the State Department for you! I'm damn sure you could do a better job than Condisleazy Rice...

[Ichingcarpenter]

35. India doesn't cow tow to Washington, China or Russia

People know nothing about India here.

The world doesn't revolve around the US

[lindbergh]

40. It's "kow tow"...not the same as dragging a bovine.

Just being helpful here. :D

[Ichingcarpenter]

42. Before you came along we were hungry.

Now we are fed up.

[lindbergh]

43. Try ipecac.

Actually, I'm on your side, you just don't know it yet.
:D

[Kire]

52. cute

[Kire]

51. what was that somebody sid about "ignorant, insulting, blanket statements"?

watch your mouth

[Kire]

50. while you sit here and argue with other Americans

our citizens are being held hostage in Mumbai

Happy Thanksgiving!

[liberalmuse]

13. I wouldn't fuck him...,

with a 1940's dildo found in the attic packed in moth balls.

[Telly Savalas]

19. He regularly has psychics on his show, doesn't he?

Somebody with King's journalistic integrity should know that a pundit can only idly speculate on the question, whereas a psychic could give a definitive answer.

[ColbertWatcher]

20. I do: they both took place in November.

Note to Larry: retire already.

[Adsos Letter]

46. Yes...

they both took place in November, 2008.

Larry King is a knothead...

[LittleApple81]

53. Larry King is not the only one. That example of BRILLIANT THOUGHT Contessa Brewer has been

repeating the same mantra all morning on MSNBC. She even dared ask if Obama was changing his plans for Thanksgiving, but she never asked why our pResident was not at the White House.

[jeffrey_X]

55. LARRY KING SUCKS

he repeats talking points and does not have the capacity to critically think or ask thought provoking questions.

I can't believe he is still on the air.

HORRIBLE

[treestar]

56. He's suffering from Americocentrism

Not everything is about the U.S.

Even if it was, it doesn't have to be a response to the election. He's using the fallacy that because something happened after another thing, the first happening must be the cause of the second.

[still_one]

57. Thank-you, I couldn't think of the right word to describe it, you just did /nt

[GreenPartyVoter]

58. Yeah, Larry. Because _everything_ is always about us.

:eyes:

[McCamy Taylor]

59. Let's see.... India supported Hillary...Hillary is now SOS.....Muslim terrorists are masochists

who secretly dream of having Hillary Clinton walk all over them with high heel shoes? Is that what you are trying to get at Larry? Or maybe you want Hillary to walk all over you with high heel shoes?

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)