|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:04 PM Original message |
Today we have photo proof: Sarah Palin lied about her pregnancy (Atlantic magazine) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Has Bristol had her baby yet? When is it due? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. What happened? Her mom lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfulcitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I thought she was getting married next summer, but the baby should be due anytime now. hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainbow4321 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
85. Odd story about Levi's ring finger tattoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
49. Oh, come on now. Don't pretend to be surprised they didn't get married. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
but siriusly folks (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
129. I thought that Bristol was due this month... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. The stonewall has worked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
61. Incest does NOT increase the likelihood of developing Down Syndrome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
72. Unless both parents have genetic traits for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. Um, no. Completely and totally wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Actually, there is a genetic risk when a young mother gives birth to a DS baby. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 07:18 AM Response to Reply #83 |
100. only partially correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #81 |
107. Yes, but the fact that it is a completely random event also means that this whole... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. The reason that older mothers have an increased risk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Yeah but my point is that Trig's DS really has no bearing on the question of who the mom is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. Actually, it might. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Interesting angle I hadn't considered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. I had one with my son. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #117 |
123. I agree. No pro-life person would ever risk an amnio. Did Palin announce that Trig was DS before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #123 |
127. I'm pretty sure she knew that he had DS before he was born. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. That alone is very telling. I agree with you. Why would a pro-life woman have amnio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #130 |
132. Here's the thread from LBN. She knew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #130 |
152. You don't have to have amnio, now, to determine that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. The article in LBN leads one to conclude that the testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #123 |
148. I think you've figured out exactly what happened! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #114 |
136. I agree with you on the amneo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #107 |
116. I agree. Trig's being a DS baby does not "prove" that Sarah is the mother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #116 |
119. Not to Frist him, but he has pretty significant epicanthic folds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. ah, but pathological liars... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geek_Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #81 |
110. Actually women in their 40's are at risk of having a down syndrome baby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Actually, that is incorrect. As a woman passes the age of 35 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #72 |
158. The only people who have "genetic traits" (sic) for Down Syndrome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
87. your theory is based on complete ignorance. You could have at least researched it first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
98. Wow, I'm almost speechless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't think she lied about the pregnancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I might agree with you, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Congrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Native (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
32. did you scroll down in the article to see a close up of the photo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
68. And compared to a photo of one of her earlier pregnancies-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. What stands out to me is the waistline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. I'm 7 months and I've gained 6 pounds and I look way bigger than she does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. No one knew I was pregnant with my first. With Bianca, they guessed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
62. But Palin looked much, much larger during her previous four pregnancies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaksavage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. She looks pregnant to me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think Palin looks pregnant, but not near nine months pregnant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. Yes...but that Bree on Desperate Housewives appeared pregnant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
9. Gods, This Is So Stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That's from a previous pregnancy, for comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Yes, I Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Who is the other woman in the photo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
53. That struck me, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. wait a minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Palin is clearly the one in red.. different hairdo/glasses, same jawjut/facial features. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. the blonde is her sister |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Yep, it's her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. How Many Palin Photos Have You Ever Seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. the woman in red is sarah.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
58. That's Sarah on the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. That Maxwrite article is excellent. I've felt since the very beginning that the bloggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. No need to produce one...see the 'math' post below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
91. Of course we were right, but the thing is, it's no longer an issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
17. We discussed it within a day of her being named, and I watched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Actually the math works out fine if Bristol were 4 1/2 months pregnant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Timeline: in all it's "mathiness" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. dna could tell the truth someday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. This crap is just like the freepers and their birth certificate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. How many is "too many"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
51. no it doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Did you read the OpEd article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
52. double post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. I wish they'd just let it go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. Actually, that is incorrect. Most babies born today with DS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
90. Obama released a BC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
134. not in their 5th pregnancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. Wow. That might cost her the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. here's a picture of Palin dated March 14, 2008 - records show Trig being born 35 days later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. obviously pregnant and resting her hands on the top of her belly a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetpotato (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
54. I stand like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
63. Just admit it, Palin is NOT pregnant. It is totally obvious that she lied her ass off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
118. I don't see that. She's not resting her hands - she's holding a cell phone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Just because a woman doesn't look pregnant doesn't mean she isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
64. You can't hide a pregnancy in the last couple of months. It's impossible. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #64 |
147. It's not impossible. Sorry. I knew a woman who didn't look pregnant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #31 |
80. Fifth pregnancy which would mean the muscles were already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #80 |
120. Especially not compared to the way she looked during previous pregnancies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Speaking as a 7-month-pregnant woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
70. No way is that woman swollen enough to be within the stated days of those births. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
82. They sure do look like proud grandparents in the lower photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #82 |
97. That's something that always struck me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #82 |
126. Yes. Bristol is that baby's mother. I'm certain of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. I've always had trouble understanding why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. That's one of the reasons I've been so skeptical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
79. It is easy to change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Does having a down syndrome baby give Palin political points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. So let me get this straight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. The events in question happened before being picked for VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. if you're asking me to make sense out of this whack-job's life.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Well, you're preaching to the choir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Here's why this is our business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #46 |
73. The whole thing is just all too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainbow4321 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
78. I've said in the past that we need to remember who is telling us the diagnosis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
135. What teenage boyfriend kisses and cuddles his fiancee's little brother? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #135 |
138. Didn't you find that a bit odd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
65. It matters because it proves she's a lying snake who will do anything to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
133. Lying about this says a lot about Palin's willingness to use her family as props. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #35 |
150. She hid the first pregnanacy as governor of Alaska. As candidate for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
45. The more important questions: 1) why is a 45-year-old woman palling around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
48. opednews link has some really good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
56. The baby could be Track's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #57 |
154. If Bristol is pregnant now, I can't see her getting pregnant so soon after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. I don't think they'd cover for the boy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #59 |
84. Track's girfriend didn't disappear. She was on the campaign trail with Palin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #84 |
96. the point is there would not be reason to cover up if the baby is Track's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 07:19 AM Response to Reply #56 |
101. Oh, C'mon. Just because she's a horrible candidate doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 08:40 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Did I say incest? NEVER! Track's girlfriend schlepped along the campaign trail, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #102 |
106. What are you talking about? Track was overseas during the campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #106 |
139. But his girlfriend was on the campaign trail with Palin and invisible. Here is a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. Okay, gotcha. I thought you were inferring that the baby was Track |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #142 |
151. Apology accepted! When you posted what you did, the thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
60. I want more investigation into this because I want Sarah Palin to be utterly destroyed politically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. Word. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #67 |
94. Word skizzle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 09:12 AM Response to Reply #60 |
104. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
66. Palin continues the republicon homelander tradition of lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
69. Palin's "pregnancy" was straight out of some Douglas Sirk movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
71. Who gives a flying fuck on a stick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
74. ***SOMEBODY PLEASE ANSWER THIS*** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #74 |
86. So where is this proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. That's an awfully big "all" you're employing. Mice in your pocket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Not as lonely as you think, I would guess. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. I can count n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 02:02 AM Response to Reply #93 |
99. Perhaps the brighter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #89 |
146. Yeah I guesss people are too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #74 |
88. Maybe she was supposed to be somewhere else after her Dallas speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 10:48 AM Response to Reply #88 |
109. Right, but she didn't tell anybody at the conference about her water breaking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #109 |
145. Palin has already Proven herself to be a vapid moron and a LIAR, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #109 |
157. She told the person in charge of the conference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
votetastic (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #74 |
105. To answer your question... If Trig had been born while Sarah was in TX.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Right, I already figured that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #105 |
141. And remember.... the doc that delivered Trig |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #74 |
128. I've been wondering the exact same thing. Why make that up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #74 |
144. Palin had to leave to "give birth", but if she said she was in labor, it would have appeared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #74 |
160. The theory I heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainbow4321 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
75. Levi spoke with the media a few months ago...due date "around Dec 18th" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:41 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. If it's her first pregnancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
95. Point 1: Somewhere there is a doctor who knows the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #95 |
143. Not really. Said doctor can speak freely about one of them when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 08:54 AM Response to Original message |
103. I spoke with someone who worked with her during that time---she was pregnant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #103 |
137. If your source "worked with" Palin then she is not an objective witness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #103 |
149. And all the housewives on Wisteria Lane thought Bree was pregnant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
121. Can I get fries with this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
122. yawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
125. Nominating for a DUzy!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainbow4321 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
131. Her belly in that pic vs a video of her a few days and weeks later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #131 |
140. Has anyone checked to see if the pregnant looking pic was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
155. She was NOT pregnant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
156. All republicans are liars. Sarah Palin is a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-06-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
159. I have always felt it was Bristol and the truth will set you free |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC