Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Democratic Intelligence Chairman tells Obama to keep Hayden at CIA and continue torture policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:33 PM
Original message
House Democratic Intelligence Chairman tells Obama to keep Hayden at CIA and continue torture policy
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/12/13/PM_hayden_wideweb__470x364,0.jpg

CongressDaily
December 10, 2008

The House Intelligence Committee's top Democrat said Tuesday he has recommended that President-elect Barack Obama keep the country's current national intelligence director and CIA chief in place for some time to ensure continuity in U.S. intelligence programs during the transition to a new administration.

Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, said he also recommended to Obama's transition team that some parts of the CIA's controversial alternative interrogation program should be allowed to continue. He declined to say what he specifically recommended, however.

The alternative interrogation program has been a lightning rod during the Bush administration's war on terrorism, drawing fierce denunciations from liberal Democrats and other critics who say it allows prisoners to be tortured. These opponents have urged Obama to shut it down.

In an interview, Reyes said he believes that Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and CIA Director Michael Hayden should be kept in their posts. Reyes believes they should stay for at least six months, but said the time frame is ultimately a decision Obama must make.

"There's got to be some continuity, and the leadership of both the CIA and the DNI is going to be pivotal to keeping us safe and secure," Reyes said. "I made a recommendation that they stay on during the transition so that there would be a period of time that there would be overlap."

read: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=41595&dcn=todaysnews


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's hope not.
That would be a very poor decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Silvestre Reyes: Idiot
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 08:46 PM by Mari333
heres some of his infamous gaffes

'In a December 2006 interview with Congressional Quarterly, Reyes said that al-Qaeda, a Sunni group, was "predominantly probably Shi'ite." He also avoided answering the question whether Hezbollah, a Shi'ite organization, was Sunni or Shi'ite, answering now famously ""Hezbollah. Uh, Hezbollah? ... Why do you ask me these questions at 5 o'clock? Can I answer in Spanish? Do you speak Spanish?" Reyes, who has been a ranking member of the Select Intelligence Committee for a number of years, was criticized for the gaffe.<6>

In the same interview, Reyes said he favors sending more troops to Iraq: "on a temporary basis, I’m willing to ramp them up by twenty or thirty thousand ... for, I don’t know, two months, four months, six months – but certainly that would be an exception."<7> Yet, a month later, when President George W. Bush proposed sending approximately 21,500 more troops, Reyes said to the El Paso Times, "we don't have the capability to escalate even to this minimal level."<8>'



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvestre_Reyes

yet another idiot telling Obama what to do. there seem to be so many of them these days.
I only hope Obama tells Silvestre to piss off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is he pushing this?
everyone knows the CIA has been decimated, and the Pentagon has taken over much of the spy business the CIA used to do. What's he getting out of pimping these dicks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Think Progress » Rep. Reyes: Since Torture Might Be Necessary ...
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 09:11 PM by bigtree
from Think Progress: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/10/reyes-obama-torture/


Rep. Reyes: Since Torture Might Be Necessary, Obama Should Keep Torture Apologists Hayden, McConnell»

Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told Congress Daily that President-elect Obama should keep Mike McConnell on as Director of National Intelligence and Michael Hayden as head of the CIA. He said Obama should keep “continuity” in the intelligence sector because we live in “a world that is very dangerous.”

Reyes dismissed concerns over Hayden and McConnell’s records as apologists for torture. He insisted that that “there are some options that need to be available” to interrogators — presumably beyond the Army Field Manuel — to get the best information: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=41595&dcn=todaysnews

Regarding the CIA’s alternative interrogation program, Reyes indicated that his recommendations concerned finding a balance so the agency does not use torture but can get valuable information from suspected terrorists or other detainees.

“There are those that believe that this particular issue has to be dealt with very carefully because there are beliefs that there are some options that need to be available,” Reyes said.

“We don’t want to be known for torturing people. At the same time we don’t want to limit our ability to get information that’s vital and critical to our national security,” he added. “That’s where the new administration is going to have to decide what those parameters are, what those limitations are.”


As the Washington Independent’s Spencer Ackerman notes, Reyes “framed the debate as between effective torture and ineffective compliance with the law . . .

McConnell and Hayden share Reyes’ approval of torture. McConnell has explained his refusal to move the CIA to the Army Field Manuel rules by denigrating Army servicemen, saying the Field Manuel was “designed for young and inexperienced” soldiers. He apparently does not consider waterboarding to be torture. Similarly, Hayden has dismissed torture as a mere “legal term,” saying we use the term “in a far too casual way.” Hayden apparently retaliated against the CIA’s inspector general for being an outspoken critic of waterboarding, and he may have destroyed interrogation videotapes to cover up the CIA’s use of torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Some people never learn.
Reyes is completely stupid.

“We don’t want to be known for torturing people. At the same time we don’t want to limit our ability to get information that’s vital and critical to our national security,” he added. “That’s where the new administration is going to have to decide what those parameters are, what those limitations are.”

The above statements in the quote have nothing to do with each other. "We don't want to be known..." WTF? NO we should simply and plainly NOT EVER torture based on law and conscience. "At the same time.." There is no "At the same time" Banning torture outright does not in ANY way, limit our use of effective intelligence gathering. How many times does it have to be proven that physical and psychological duress that is consistent with what the Geneva Conventions call torture, yields little to no valuable information. Finally, "That's where the new administration is going to have to decide where those parameters are..." Again, WTF? the parameters are defined. WE helped to define them in the Geneva Conventions in order to prevent mistreatment of our soldiers AND the soldiers of our Enemies by us. Regardless of whether they are "Enemy non-combatants" or whatever the administration wants to call them. If they are fighting us in a war, then they are soldiers. If they are terrorists, then they are CRIMINALS. Either way they retain the right to not be tortured. All of this Bush administration bullshit word play has to go, like yesterday! We either abide by the laws and treaties that we helped to create or we stop fucking around and just come out and say that we are no longer a part of the world community and will not play by any rules.

Hayden, McConnell, and Reyes need to get the boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Perhaps torture should be applied to Mr Reyes to see if he might depart from the truth in order to
stop the torture! :mad:

*disclaimer: I am totally against ALL torture, even on assholes like this who suggest it might be useful. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. his arm twisted by zealous professionals
we need a stiffer spine in that chair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hate Reyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks bigtree.
I'll comment after my blood pressure subsides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. kinda speaks for itself
doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Unfortunately. I posted these two videos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I hope they've seen these
. . . they can't have both with Hayden and McConnell in place imposing their Bush view against the initiative of the new administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No, they can't. While I can understand a "team of rivals" concept,
I understand the concepts of Constitutional law better. Let's hope there is no consideration to continue with dark actors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fuck the continutiy
Bush cut the throats of anyone who was actually loyal to our country in the CIA when he came in. We have to end this Neo-con infection of our intelligence services. President Obama promised we wouldn't be a country that tortures anymore and he'd better come out hard and publicly against any suggestion we keep the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gen. Hayden and the claimed irrelevance of presidential appointments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. that is a great article and very true
fucking hypocrites!

:grr:

This idea that "qualifications and pragmatism matter, not ideology" is a meaningless buzzphrase. It's pure nonsense designed to neuter any criticism of Obama's appointments. If someone wants to say -- as Atrios did today -- that they're willing to tolerate the exclusion of liberals from Obama's cabinet and even demonization campaigns against the Left if that's the vehicle and strategy for enacting a progressive agenda, that at least is a rational assessment (though I think there's serious costs to encouraging not only Republicans and the media, but also Democrats, to all join together to agree that the one unspeakable bogeyman is the Left).

But this broader point that pragmatism and "competence" are being valued above ideology is incoherent and manipulative. When it comes to political power, this claim is devoid of meaning. Ideology, by definition, always matters when it comes to what political leaders do. And yet -- just like the brand new claim that high-level appointments don't matter -- many, many people have been easily persuaded to recite this "competence-over-ideology" mantra over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Contact him HERE --
Let him know NO TORTURE, NO RENDITION, NO BEING HELD WITHOUT CHARGES:

DC Address:
The Honorable Silvestre Reyes
United States House of Representatives
2433 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-4316
DC Phone: 202-225-4831
DC Fax: 202-225-2016

District Office:
310 North Mesa, Suite 400
El Paso, TX 79901 Voice: 915-534-4400
FAX: 915-534-7426


http://wwwc.house.gov/reyes/voice_your_opinion.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, let's see if Obama is merely the Puppet POTUS or
the real president. Time will tell.


Republicanists = economic terrorists. They hate the American way of life. They hate the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC