Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does Obama tolerate attempt by the press to propagate scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:25 AM
Original message
Why does Obama tolerate attempt by the press to propagate scandal
where he is concerned? Why doesn't he speak out about how AP, CNN, etc., continuously try to bring him down or spread false propaganda designed to scandalize him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. because he is above that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. As frustrated as he must be, the best way to deal with smears
is the way he has for the past year: To just tell what he knows and leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He noes he is innocent....the more them Pubs attack, the stronger he will emerge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the press conference is going great
and to me the story is over. I doubt the republicans think so.
But I'm enjoying the press conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ditto
He was great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. The press conference was excellent. But as soon as it was over,
MSNBC clearly stated that this was not going to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because throwing a tantrum about how "unfair" the media is
is the absolute last refuge of a politician who's about to be destroyed by his own wrongdoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly.
I think he handled it just right today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I agree! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Bullshit.
I'm not talking about a "tantrum". Futhermore, Obama needs no "last refuge" and neither does he face being "destroyed by his own wrongdoing".

The news hacks are LYING to the American people. There must be some sort of recourse and if their isn't then Obama should begin talking about restoring the Fairness Doctrine and other regulations prohibiting this sort of false smearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are right that he needs no last refuge, nor has he done wrong.
Which is why he will not act as if he does and did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. What lies are you talking about? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. He's channeling his inner Dukakis. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Better than channelling his inner Rumsfeld. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Yes. I ADORE Dukakis, so it wasn't an insult. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. To be fair, the media would not be doing their job if they didn't thoroughly investigate
the possibility that Obama or his staff were involved in this corruption. All the evidence at this point indicates that Obama and his staff will come out of this with flying colors, but that doesn't mean that the questions shouldn't be asked.

Frankly, I don't want the media taking *any* president's word as gospel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. WHAT FUCKING INVESTIGATION?
That's the stupidest thing I've read all day. The media doesn't INVESTIGATE a GOD DAMNED THING! They just make shit up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. If they are making something up, then yes, that is inappropriate.
But are you honestly saying that the media *shouldn't* investigate something like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. They don't investigate. They write and read from scripts written in
the HQ of General Electric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It would help if you provided some specific example of the HQ of GE
writing a script in this instance. What reporting from NBC or MSNBC do you think has been unfair or inaccurate?

Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yeah...like they thouroughly investigated that whole "weapons of mass destruction" thingy?
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 12:21 PM by tjwash
:eyes:

This is the same whore media slimed Gore in 2000 by starting and propagating the whole "sore-loserman" "get over it" shit, cheer-leaded and were complicit in the bush administrations lies and march to an illegal oil war in the middle east, gave slanted and biased coverage to the 9-11 investigations, and did everything that they absolutely could to derail the Democrats during the Primaries.


Please...

All of a sudden they are going to magically start acting like journalists now? I'll be surprised if the mother fuckers don't applaud every pardon that bush gives out from now till Jan 20th.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Wait, I'm confused. Do you want the press to investigate corruption or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Suddenly we have an "investigative media?"
Where were they for the last eight years?

They need to invesitgate this: Fitzgerald's statement that PE Obama ( and by this I assume he means any representatives of PE Obama) is not in any way implicated in this.

Unless having your name on a now vacated Senate seat, as in "Obama's former senate seat in Illinios", means something? Which it does not.

I drive the Illinois toll road now and then, the word Illinios appears on the sign, I must be implicated. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Jebus. I'm not saying anyone in the media should report falsehoods.
But to whine about the press for making a big deal about something that IS A BIG FUCKING DEAL is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I'm not whinning about anything, there is simply nothing there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. And if this was about Bush, would you feel comfortable if the press decided after 24 hours
that there was simply nothing there? C'mon...

I think it is extremely likely that Obama is going to come out of this looking very, very good. But to suggest that the media would be doing its job if it determined there was "nothing there" at this point is not reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. The press has investigated this as has Fitzgerald I see nothing there.
Investigations have been on going since 2004 and the Chicago Trib. paper was part of it.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-investigation-timeline-1208,0,497054,full.story

From Huff Po:

Bob CescaPosted December 10, 2008
Obama Unfairly Tainted by Crimes He Didn't Commit


>>It began yesterday with the RNC demanding to know the full extent of the president-elect's relationship with Blagojevich even though Patrick Fitzgerald was perfectly clear about the relationship when he said on national television that the president-elect had nothing to do with any of it. But to suggest that the former junior senator from Illinois never communicated with the governor of Illinois is ridiculous on its face -- of course there was the usual level of professional communication there, though it entirely fails to prove or even implicate any corruption on the part of Barack Obama. Then again, since when does reality matter?

Meanwhile, the Politico and numerous other news organizations have been attempting to make this the first "scandal" of the Obama presidency as if Blagojevich is somehow a member of the transition or an appointee to the future administration. The truth is Obama never endorsed Blagojevich and Blagojevich never endorsed Obama. Unless you consider Blagojevich's obnoxious "fuck him" remark to be an endorsement, that is.<<
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/obama-unfairly-tainted-by_b_150011.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Ok, Case closed. Everybody go home. Glad every question is answered. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Exactly! No case, nothing to see.
Fitzgerald will investigate Blago, as he said he is doing.

In the meantime I want the PE Obama to govern, there is much to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. t he tapes make crystal clear that Obama would not play ball with Blagojevich
but aside from that, I don't disagree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes, *all* the available evidence makes Obama & his staff look quite good.
But if all the party affiliations were switched in this incident, people would be screaming bloody murder around here if the press wasn't asking tough questions.

I want the press to ask tough questions, to investigate, and to make the results of that investigation clear. I have every belief that if they do that, Obama will come out smelling like a rose, and the public will be well-served for the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Where did Blago get that from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. "Fuck him. For nothing? Fuck him."
That's his involvement.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yeah, that's what it certainly looks like.
Should the media pack up and go home, or do you think that if this was a Republican, you might want them to ask one or two follow-up questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. quite frankly, Im more interested in whats going on to prevent the next Depression
And I live in IL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama is going to have the last laugh here
Bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Whattaya gonna do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. Obama can hardly control the press
And we'd prefer he do what he has to do rather than let the right wing call the shots as usual and use up time trying to disprove their nonsense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'm hoping on this one that he can point to it when they start
prosecuting the real corruption - the Bush regime. He can say he doesn't condone corruption on either side of the isle. The more the media blathers about it the more people will remember. I hope.

But it just may be me feeling pollyanna today. We'll see. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC