Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mumbai Terrorists Prospered Under U.S.-Backed Musharraf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:52 AM
Original message
Mumbai Terrorists Prospered Under U.S.-Backed Musharraf
Source: Dawn Editorial



Never far from the news, Pakistan has been firmly in the global spotlight since the Mumbai attacks. The steady drip of leaks from investigators in India and comments by Indian and American officials suggest that a Pakistan connection to the Mumbai attacks has been irrefutably established, at least in the eyes of the wider world. There is, however, a second, sometimes unspoken line of charges against Pakistan: that we are a state with weak governance where terrorist groups have long run amok. "Enough is enough, now put your house in order," the world led by India and the U.S. is saying to Pakistan. We wish the world, and in particular the United States, wasn't so selective in its memories of what has brought Pakistan to such a pass.

If Lashkar-i-Taiba reached the kind of position of strength that it was able to execute the Mumbai attacks with such consummate ease, it didn't do so in a vacuum. The Lashkar’s capabilities grew on the watch of General Musharraf, a military strongman supported by American dollars and a White House that believed he was its best bet for taking on, in the tribal areas, al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

Even as it became clear that General Musharraf wasn't delivering on American demands and perhaps was playing the dangerous double game of covertly supporting militant groups, the Americans steadfastly stood by their man. The past year provided a particularly unedifying juxtaposition of a desperate general clinging to power and the resurgence of the two largest political parties, the Pakistan Peoples Party and the Pakistan Muslim League, Nawaz Branch , both which unambiguously support closer ties to India. Throughout that tussle, the U.S. remained a silent spectator, keen not to upset a fading dictator. So it must be said that militancy is a problem not only because of Pakistan’s numerous sins of commission - but also because of sins of omission by the U.S., whose interests in Afghanistan led it to back a ruler who made neither Pakistan nor the region safer.

more: http://worldmeets.us/dawn000016.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC