Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1998 Long Term Capital Management Bailout needs a second look in todays light

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 06:49 PM
Original message
1998 Long Term Capital Management Bailout needs a second look in todays light
Check out this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-Term_Capital_Management

Gee, all the players seem to be the same as in todays debacles 10 YEARS LATER.

(This is the first time "too big to fail" was used as far as I am aware.)

Hedge funds are UNREGULATED FINANCIAL CASINOS for the uber-wealthy.

It's too f!@##ing bad if they become too big to fail. The truth is that THE PEOPLE INVOLVED ARE TOO BIG TO FAIL -

Only they're not.
Because they do.
FAIL.

But they intimidate others to believe that they are.

TOO BIG TO FAIL

Hedge funds make nothing but bets. If they fail, it's just like your local casino going under. They make nothing useful or practical except profits for the uber rich.

If a pension or a retirement or a municipality invests in an UNREGULATED ENTITY like a hedge fund, than everyone involved should be fired and sued for a breach of fiduciary duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hedge funds aren't just bets and still have regulation
Many hedge funds actually self regulate with mandates which are bound by laws, to help protect the interest of investors. If someone does their due diligence ahead of time, it is no difference than investing in any other entity.

You can't make blanket characterizations of the whole industry, because of a few bad apples. Enron was a fraud too, but it doesn't mean that investing in stocks is a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. " 'self -regulate' with mandates which are bound by laws"
What kind of gobblygook is that? I have always understood that hedge funds are specifically NOT regulated because their entry is confined to people who are so wealthy and so sophisticated that they are capable of looking out for their own interests. So let them.

What mandates do you refer to which are "bound by laws"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You enter into a contract with the hedge fund
which places restrictions on the actions and investment strategies they can pursue, or else you can sue. Hedge funds set up agreements like this because investors like to invest in something that is legally accountable for their actions.

I do agree that there should be more regulations, but it doesn't mean that the industry is just some wild casino. You can invest safely in hedge funds if you know what the hell you are doing, which a pension fund manager should know.

Placing money into something because you want to strike rich is obviously a dumb strategy. Putting some money into a market neutral hedge fund to diversify your risks can be a sound strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dumped Merrill Lynch for pushing hedge funds at me
even after I told them I knew they were nothing but Ponzi schemes. It turned out they were even worse than ordinary Ponzi schemes. At least Carlo Ponzi only targeted the greedy. These guys tried to gain legitimacy through respected brokerages and managed well enough to target just about any institution with money to invest.

There should be a special hell for thieves like Madoff and it should be shared by everyone at the SEC who did nothing about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC