Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Playboy apologizes for cover in Mexico featuring nearly nude 'Mary'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:52 PM
Original message
Playboy apologizes for cover in Mexico featuring nearly nude 'Mary'
Playboy, based in Chicago, has offered its "sincerest apologizes" for the newest issue of its Mexican edition, which seems to poke irreverent (some would say lewd) fun at the Virgin Mary.

The magazine's cover features a model clad (barely) in a white cloth, in front of a stained glass window. The headline, "Te adoramos, Maria," means in English, "We love you Mary," or "We love you, Maria." (The model is Maria Florencia Onori.)

The magazine hit the stands on Dec. 1 -- seven days before the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, a holy day of obligation in the Catholic Church; and 11 days before an even bigger holiday in Mexico, the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, commemorating the supposed appearance of the Virgin to a Mexican peasant, Juan Diego, in 1531.

In its apology, Playboy said the Mexican edition of the magazine is published by a licensee, and that the parent company did not approve the cover.

"While Playboy Mexico never meant for the cover or images to offend anyone, we recognize that it has created offense, and we as well as Playboy Mexico offer our sincerest apologies," the company said.



http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/12/playboy-apologizes-for-cover-i.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is pretty tacky. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Silicone Mary
There's a decent blog name there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Our Lady of the Immaculate Hooters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Horses have left the barn.
Does anyone actually read Playboy anymore? These people would shit if they ever did an unfiltered Google search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. They distributed this mag cover
in a majority-Catholic country and are surprised at the response? WTF were they thinking? Oh right, they weren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Mary's defiance of gravity is a miracle indeed.
Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The son of god needs proper nursing tools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like it!
Nice poke in the eye of organized religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even in Mexico you can see more skin on any beach..
The woman isn't even close to "nearly nude".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, but they cover up in church
The phrase 'asking for trouble' springs to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I didn't realize that Playboy was sold in the churches..
Imagine my surprise..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm talking about the cover photo. Stained glass window suggests church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Two things - notice how the apology was a real one, not the "we are sorry if anyone was offended"
crap we are used to from the pukes.

Second, people who are offended need to lighten up. It's pretty goddamned benign as far as "blasphemy" goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. She makes me want to touch my rosary
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. I know !!!!!1
i gripped mine so hard, it popped the beads off one by one, sent them flying across the room!

:rofl:

dp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. Never does it fail to amaze me
what silliness over which people will choose expend perfectly good outrage, when there is growing homelessness, hunger, disease, and war -- all the things JC stood against.

Meh. All those are just waaaaaaaaaaahhh!!! toooooo harrrrrrrd!!, might require a little effort, a little personal investment to fix. (Personal effort and personal investment were good enough for JC, just observin' here.)

YNK. Mary of Nazareth might be thinking, "Nu, two thousand years, and only just now someone gets an idea I might have been worth looking at, too, or maybe thinking of as more than just Somebody's Mom. I might have been more than someone to cook three meals, wash the dishes, keep a frum house, and schlep the kids on the donkey from home to schul to soccer practice and back again. (sigh) It's ok. I'll just sit here in the dark, never mind me..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. That ________ really stands out!
Modern science is grand!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riverman Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. What Mary was Never unclothed? Oh Yeah, the Immaculate
Thing! Even still she must of had breasts with which to feed the babe in swaddling clothes. Hell, with air-brushing and Photo-shopping, the girls in PB have been immaculate too! Get over it. This is 2008, not 312 A.D. when those lovely myths got started with vigor!

http://www.reformation.org/pope-constantine.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Feast of the Immaculate Conception
is about Mary's conception and not Jesus'. Mary had to be a clean vessel for the Lord and not some stinky regular woman of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think the stained glass window is an upside-down vagina
Nobody's pissed about that?

If that was Mary, no wonder god went after her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Blasphemy is a victimless crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC