Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this a phase, or is this "it" for the whole term?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:33 PM
Original message
Is this a phase, or is this "it" for the whole term?
Will it get better once policy decisions are being made, and things are improving in real life? Will this be a phase, or will DU become a site that is primarily for hating Obama's decisions? I don't mean criticizing some of them but for every single one to be beaten into the ground. That's what it has felt like since the afterglow wore off.

I understand the criticism for the picks for cabinet and for the inaugural, but it just seems like this place is about 85% negative now, and just not exactly pleasant to hang in anymore. I hope it's just a phase. I am starting to miss the days when the majority of barbs were directed at our opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Is that all there is?"
Nah, I think 'this' is a bunch of people scrutinizing every last decision made at the moment and voicing their opinion.

When Obama and his admin start getting into the 'meat' of what needs to be done, it will either be great or not enough. The scrutiny will continue.

"That's what it's all about."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anndash Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. His choice of Warren just put
a cloud over his inauguration which should have been a beacon of hope for the future of our country. Instead, a bigoted religious fanatic will share the stage with the first black president. It is utterly disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually, there has been mostly negativity since he began cabinet picks.
Everything he does is wrong if DU is your sole source of info. This didn't begin with Warren. I understand the justified anger about Warren. I don't like him either, but I think it's less important than actual policy-making. But every pick Obama has made seems to get panned by most of the posters. It's tiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anndash Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Actually, I don't have a problem with the Cabinet
because I believe Obama will be "in charge" and it remains to be seen what the consequences of his picks will be there. However, choosing a bigoted, hateful, religious fanatic to make history with you on the same stage at such an historical moment is nauseating - to me- and many others who tried to forgive him for kissing Lieberman's butt. Too much butt kissing ruins the image I have of "change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Please point out something he's done right.
I like his idea for a vast jobs program. Unfortunately, I don't trust him not to make it "more centrist" by privatizing the program and creating $8 an hour non-union jobs for contractor middlemen who get all the tax money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I guess you answered my question.
If you can't pick one thing you think he's done right since winning, then I doubt you ever will throughout his term(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I did pick one thing he's done right. I just said that I don't trust him to actually do it
given everything else he's done.

Job creation is critically important. If he does it without pandering to corporations, he'll have my vote on that alone. But I don't expect him to. Why would I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Huh? You are unhappy..
with the things he hasn't done yet, because you think that he won't do them the way you want? How certain are you about your vision of his future? And here, I'm still not convinced he'll be inaugurated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anaxarchos Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. The "vast" jobs program...
...is 2.5 million jobs over two years (half of what is needed)... at the price of $1.2 to $2 trillion in "stimulus"... or between $500,000 and $800,000 PER JOB.

Sorry to pour gasoline on your fire but read Stiglitz.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravehammer Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is there a positive spin to put on this decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's not my point.
Welcome to DU! :hi:

It's just kind of a next-to-the-last-straw feeling... every single decision seems to be met with extreme negativity since the cabinets picks started coming out. I guess I just finally got tired of it today, but that in no way is meant to indicate approval of Warren as a pick. I just wish there were more posts about good things going on (Jackeens' photo posts seem to be about all there is lately).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. What % negative was it yesterday?
82%? I don't think so. Reading your post, it appears you think that DU is negative against Obama all the time and has been for a while. I disagree. It was only yesterday that the majority of barbs were indeed directed at our opposition.

This Warren pick is a BIG DEAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Then you haven't been paying attention
There's been a LOT of complaining about the cabinet picks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. During the Bush regime, DU became a catch-all for anyone who hated Bush.
Democrats, anarchists, progressives (Naderites), and Paultards all have settled in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Do you even know wtf you're talking about?
DU was founded in January of '01 as a place of refuge on the net for Dems who hated the status quo, to work/vent against Bush.

The only group you listed that was not here from Day One was the Paultard demographic. This site has NEVER been about propping up Dems with no criticism whatsoever. The only reason we have that rule against bad mouthing the nominee was because of the psycho Dean fans in 04 losing their shit in every Kerry thread once it was clear he would be the nominee.

The ONLY thing that has always been against the rules in terms of slamming Dems is actively working against the party, ie telling people to vote for Nader, etc. Those anarchists, Naderites, etc were perfectly welcome here as long as they followed that rule, and many have been fine members of this community for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Far as I'm concerned, we need a hell of a lot more "it".
You court progressive and make a hard turn to the right, you get the criticism you deserve. Dance with them that brung ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. everything is a phase..
I go through a tune out phase every so often. Delete all my bookmarks, remove the site from my favorites. Sometimes I get really pissed and delete all the political files on my computer, delete all my bookmarks..everything. I hope I've learned my lesson not to do that anymore, because sooner rather than later I'm back in the saddle again, and it's a bitch finding all that stuff again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. A-HA! There is a name for this feeling....
Shiver posted it on another thread.... I am afflicted with "Outrage Fatigue." It doesn't mean that I blame any one particular brand of outrage. I am just tired of the seemingly neverending supply of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. somewhere toward the end of the archive of GD
. . . there's massive glut of the positive (unresponded to) posts that you are looking for. The complaints always get more attention and rise to the top of the page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Sorry, but I think you're at the wrong site.
It's never been a hallelujah chorus here. The primaries were an aberration, and I'm sorry you got the impression from them that this is somehow welovedemocratsandneverquestionthem.com.

Underground. Okay? It means we are not mainstream, and we do not go along to get along. We're inherently a site of dissenters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. There is a middle ground possible....
between hallelujia chorus and 24-7outragefest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. If you really think this is a 24-7 outragefest
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 12:34 AM by Chovexani
You are hopelessly naive.

Again, you're obviously new. Lurk more. Please. The post-primary lovefest was an abberation, and anyone that's been here long enough knows that. You're begging this site to be something it inherently has never been about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Now that I saw your comments above about the previous primaries...
I understand that you and I will never agree on much.... You apparently still harbor a lot of negativity from primaries of the past. Move on.... life's short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. That's not true..
there are times when this place has been thoughtful, very informative, and posters actually have polite discussion without all the hyperbole, and caustic language. I swear, I remember it. You know, like when the topic is something other than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. If it is, I'm gone.....
I'm an active reader but occasional poster and sometimes donor and if this continues I won't be around long. I suspect most who share these sentiments won't bother posting before they cease visiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
26. You know what is SO ironic.....I think almost all of the Hillar primary supporters including myself
are more optimistic and hopeful than the Obama primary supporters.

I am over the moon at Obama becoming president.

My first whiff of discontent has been the Warren thing, but I am still waiting on that to see what will happen....although I have refused to post on any of the other threads b/c I AGREE with the unhappiness over the decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I agree... many of us Hill supporters have cut Obama a lot of slack
Waiting to see his policies as opposed to the appearance of what is going-on. However, Warren doing the invocation is a blatant slap in the face of everything progressive.

Obama deserves a big FUCK YOU for that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. I have a feeling it's "it."
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 05:34 AM by WritersBlock


But then, as was pointed out upthread, you are obviously new here, having only been a member since 2003, and I myself have only been here since 2004, so I guess we're both just hopelessly naive newbies who need to lurk longer.

The one thing uniting DU throughout its entire existence has been opposition of the Bush administration. That's gone now, or will be soon. And so I think we're just beginning to see how very diverse the membership of this community actually is, because now, without that commonality, the differences in opinion are starting to really show up.

But old habits die hard, if they die at all. The Democrats are back in power, so there's no common "enemy" to rail at anymore. We start transferring the vitriol previously directed toward the Bush administration to each other, and woe be unto those who are not sufficiently offended at each new transgression, for it must mean they're not sufficiently progressive.

In other words, now we start eating our own. The freepers must be loving it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
29. I've been angry for eight years.
I'm sorry, Rick Warren is a horrible postule on the face of humanity... but after an unjust war built on lies that nearly killed a good friend, the ban on stem cell research, the desecration of the Constitution, warrantless wiretapping, the Patriot Act, torture, hypocrisy, trickle-down economics, corruption, oil company handouts, environmental rape, No Child Left Behind, blurred separation of church and state, attacks on women's rights, attacks on gay rights, attempted anti-gay constitutional amendments, a horrible recession, treason, stolen elections, ignoring global warming, millions of lost jobs, health care crisis, human rights violations, The Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, Katrina, "Heckuva job, Brownie!", "Mission Accomplished", "Freedom Fries", "Bring 'em On", "Not with us you're against us", massive secrecy, shunning allies, cronyism, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rove, McCain, Palin....

...

...I just can't find the outrage for a guy who's gonna pray for thirty seconds.

I've spent eight years being angry. Call it Outrage Fatigue, but anger gives me horrible migraines, and I've had one a week on average for eight years now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. FISA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC