Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Obama just pw3n Holy Joe Leiberman?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:54 AM
Original message
Did Obama just pw3n Holy Joe Leiberman?
Doesn't this make Holy Joe's Homeland Security Committee redundant?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/us/politics/08council.html?_r=1&ref=politics

Obama Is Reported Set to Revise Counterterrorism Efforts


By PETER BAKER
Published: January 7, 2009

WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama is preparing to scrap the way President Bush oversaw domestic security in the White House and name a former Central Intelligence Agency official to coordinate counterterrorism, people close to the transition said Wednesday.


The plan being discussed would eliminate the independent homeland security adviser’s office and assign those duties to the National Security Council to streamline sometimes overlapping functions. A deputy national security adviser would be charged with overseeing the effort to guard against terrorism and to respond to natural disasters.

Democrats close to the transition said Mr. Obama’s choice for that job was John O. Brennan, a longtime C.I.A. veteran who was the front-runner to head the spy agency until withdrawing in November amid criticism of his views on interrogation and detention policies. His appointment would not require Senate confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Take that, Liebertoady, you republicon homelander phony, you
Back to the Irrelevancy Bus with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. UNDER teh bus, por favor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Checkmate
Does Obama play chess? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. All your committee are belong to us..
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 10:20 AM by Fumesucker
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Perfect. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. they should ditch the agency, what has it done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. pw3nd like a muthafucka. BOOOM SHAKA LAKA SHAKA LAKA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. In addition to the advisor, let's retire the department and the term with Bush.
I hope to never hear "homeland" again after Jan 20. Wouldn't that be nice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. the term has bad associations and should be retired
I agree

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I agree. "Homeland" creeps me out in a visceral, Nazi sort of way
I have images of everyone joining hands and singing "Tomorrow Belongs to Me." Very creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. The first time I heard "Homeland Security" I thought of the Third Reich.
It somehow fits with Bush, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Abso-f'ing-lutely!!
We are a nation of immigrants (and I say that even tho my family has been here at least since 1750) and 'homeland' is the wrong term. National security, domestic security, yes, but not 'homeland security'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. the homeland term needs to be ditched just like surge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. Agreed one hundred percent. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. had a strong premonition this would happen n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Brennan was defender of torture and strong advocate for Fisa expansion. Wake up Libs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I know, but Lieberman is even more odious..
What was it Churchill said about using the devil if it helped defeat Hitler?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Blah Blah Blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Read Salon on Mr. Pro Rendition Brennan, NYT article fudged the facts.

In Salon, quoting Brennan. and showing him speaking out of both sides of mouth.

Obama is continuing Fisa spying and maybe much more.


JOHN BRENNAN: I think it's an absolutely vital tool. I have been intimately familiar now over the past decade with the cases of rendition that the U.S. Government has been involved in. And I can say without a doubt that it has been very successful as far as producing intelligence that has saved lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. Candidate for C.I.A. Post Withdraws His Name
November 25, 2008, 5:05 pm
Candidate for C.I.A. Post Withdraws His Name
By Mark Mazzetti

John O. Brennan, a C.I.A. veteran who many believed would be the spy agency’s next director, on Tuesday withdrew his name from consideration for a top job in the Obama administration amid concerns he was intimately linked to controversial C.I.A. programs authorized by President Bush.

In a letter to President-elect Barack Obama, Mr. Brennan said he did not want these concerns to be a “distraction” for the incoming administration. At the same time, he vigorously defended his C.I.A. record and called himself a “strong opponent” of the harsh interrogation methods the agency has used in recent years, including waterboarding.

The letter came as a surprise to many intelligence experts and even some lawmakers, and some questioned whether Mr. Brennan had been forced to withdraw his name by senior members of Mr. Obama’s transition team who were concerned about Mr. Brennan’s association with Bush administration policies. One official with the Obama transition team, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the decision was entirely Mr. Brennan’s.

The opposition to Mr. Brennan had been largely confined to liberal blogs, and there was not an expectation he would face a particularly difficult confirmation process. Still, the episode shows that the C.I.A.’s secret detention program remains a particularly incendiary issue for the Democratic base, making it difficult for Mr. Obama to select someone for a top intelligence post who has played any role in the agency’s campaign against Al Qaeda since the Sept. 11 attacks.

More:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/candidate-for-cia-post-withdraws-his-name/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is that the only committee of which LIEberman is a chairperson? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. no
"The cabinet Department of Homeland Security would not be affected by any of these moves."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes, yes, fine, if you want to keep the damn cabinet, but at LEAST
change the name to less Hitleresque, please.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. You mistake a feature for a bug. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Right, not formally however..
I suspect that power will flow away from Lieberman with this move, it's uncanny how Obamas opponents seem to trip over their own shoelaces.

It's wise to recall that Obama has a nine fingered former IDF troop as his chief enforcer.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. Maybe not formally, but is counter-terrorism is treated as national security rather than "Homeland,"
Then Lieberputz is basically left overseeing the Coast Guard and the Border Patrol, with all the important stuff happening elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
23. I'm trying to figure out
what pw3n means.

But if it means to do away with, I am all for it. Anything to make that little mealworm squirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. It means "own"
As in "you got owned."

As in "You got handed your ass on a platter."

I still don't see how it has anything to do with Lieberman, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. LOL..
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pw3n

pw3n

A silly abbreviation of the equally silly word "pwn," which is derived from a misspelling of the word "own."

It is used to indicate superiority.
"I'm cool I scored 4 million points playing Pac-Man. I totally pw3n Inky's ass."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Hmmmm....
Thank you for the definition. I usually just use the Google to find out what some of the keyboard shorthand is... This time I wondered if it was just me.. If I am the only person on the planet who doesn't know what the blogbuzzword du jour is.

Could you please tell me though, why you think Lieberman will be pw3n'ed?

Why would it make his job, that he doesn't really do in the first place, obsolete?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. I see it as an end run around Liebercreep's committee.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. How would this effect Leiberman?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. Article seems misleading. Brennen was defender of rendition and harsh interrorgation
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 10:58 AM by terisan
He also is big defender of Fisa. This seems to me to be the signal that Obama does indeed intend to keep the spying program, which he did vote for, and may be waffling on the "harsh interrogation" techniques or renditions or something else.

Brennan withdrew from his previous appointment in the Bush administration because some Senators were opposed to his defense of hardline policies.

Note that this new position means Congress doesn't get to question him. There seems to be much subterfuge here and I don't know for sure what is going on----but it is not straightforward.

I think there may be a reason that Bush and Cheney are not afraid of being called to account on torture. This is disappointing.





edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. There goes the whole, 'it would have passed anyway, he'll change it once he's in office' rationale
Paraphrasing of course. What a silly notion.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
31. way to go Obama!
take that loserman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. I PREDICTED THIS WOULD HAPPEN, YES I DID
(polishes fingernails against shirt, blows on them to increase luster, breaks out the Turtle wax).

I am just so damn good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. Under the Bus.....Joe is Under the Bus.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
35. I couldn't figure out what Liarman was doing after meeting with Obama yesterday
WASHINGTON, Jan. 7 (UPI) -- Sen. Joseph Lieberman said Tuesday that the top priority of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is completing an authorization bill.

Lieberman, I-Conn., who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, met Tuesday with Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, President-elect Barack Obama's nominee for secretary of homeland security. After the meeting, Lieberman said a top priority for his committee is to mark up an authorization bill, CongressDaily reported.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3678590&mesg_id=3678590

His committee is gonna be marginalized and he knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. asshole joe just got neutered...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. Did he also just smush Peter fucking King of NY?
With his homeland security committee spot?

I sure hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. How that bastard gets elected time after time amazes me
and he is just so out of place in NY Politics.
http://www.nastyletters.blogspot.com/

Peter King + Karl Rove= Best Friends Forever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. While the rest of us are playing checkers, Obama's playing chess.
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. PWNED!!!!111
Very nice, actually.

One of the virtues of having a highly intelligent President is that he can pull sneaky maneuvers like this.

Looks like Lieberman's oversight committee won't have much to oversee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dodger501 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. Man, I am ignorant
What does 'pw3n' mean and how does this event affect Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
43. Reminds me of FDR's attempt to stack the Supreme Court
Didn't work, but it put the fear of the Executive Branch into the formerly obstructionist judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
suck it droopy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. Thank you for pointing this out! You made my day! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC