Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US says Iraqis may still be held indefinitely without charge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:46 PM
Original message
US says Iraqis may still be held indefinitely without charge
http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticle08.asp?xfile=data/middleeast/2009/January/middleeast_January230.xml§ion=middleeast

(Reuters)

9 January 2009

BAGHDAD - Some prisoners held indefinitely without charge by U.S. forces in Iraq may not be freed or given trials, even though U.S. forces lost the authority to hold them at the beginning of this year, a U.S. military spokesman said.

Iraqi legal experts said the plans -- which would apply to prisoners U.S. forces believe are dangerous or of intelligence value but have not been charged with a crime -- might violate Iraqi law by placing detainees beyond the reach of the courts.

U.S. forces are holding 15,000 prisoners, most of whom have been detained without charge under the authority of a U.N. Security Council resolution which expired on Dec. 31.

Under the terms of a bilateral pact which took effect on Jan. 1, Washington agreed that all its prisoners would either be transferred to Iraqi custody under arrest warrants from Iraqi judges, or freed "in a safe and orderly manner".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, this ought to be good
:popcorn:

Lets see if we hold up our end of the bargain, or simply say "You signed saying we could stay. Congratulations!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. "U.S. forces believe are dangerous or of intelligence value..."
But didn't Bush just say he got the intelligence wrong? How do we know these people aren't being held because of wrong intelligence? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Enduring threats"...
now there's a new one for me.
But U.S. military spokesman Major Neal Fisher said Washington will ask Iraq not to free prisoners it considers "'radical extremists' or 'enduring threats'".

"There will be cases in which a detainee falls into the category of high intelligence value or is a high threat but has not violated an Iraqi law, and thus should be released based on the security agreement," he said in an e-mail.

"We seriously desire that they will choose to keep these particular detainees off the streets."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC