Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

5 "Democrats" voted against paycheck equality....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:19 PM
Original message
5 "Democrats" voted against paycheck equality....
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 01:28 PM by Double_Talk_Express
names to follow...

(3 Republicans voted in favor)

CLARIFICATION: 5 "Dems" have voted against the Lily Ledbetter act -- 3 "Dems" voted against a related bill

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. marking for later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not bad, overall, that represents a 94% party unity on that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yes and no
I would expect all Democrats to support equal pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think those "Dems" need to hear from us ladies...
and the men who support us. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did it pass?????????!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. the first bill did....they're voting on the second now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Can you explain? I'm not able to watch and am ill informed
it would appear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Blue dog coalition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. only 2 of the 6 different voters listed are Blue Dogs - 2 of 47
so in other words less than 5% of Blue Dogs so voted.


But don't let that stop kneejerk smearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not a fan eh lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. A fan of truth is what I am. You? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I would like to think so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. In which case then you surely agree
That Blue Dogs were not the majority of the recalcitrant Dems on equal pay, and only a tiony fraction of Blue Dogs voted against it?

Right?

I look forward to incorporation of this understanding on future posts concerning Blue Dog philosophy since you like to think you are a fan of teh truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Dupe delete NT
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 02:25 PM by dmallind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. It seems those are the facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. they all fit the blue dog mold
white
southern (except Minnick)
pro-corporate
anti-choice
homophobic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. CLARIFICATION: 5 Dems have voted against the Lily Ledbetter act -- 3 voted against a related bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here they are:
Paycheck Fairness Act:
Bobby Bright (AL)
Walt Minnick (ID)
Parker Griffith (AL)

These three are freshman reactionaries the DCCC spent MILLIONS on to elect.

Lily Ledbetter Act:
Dan Boren (OK)
Allen Boyd (FL)
Bobby Bright (AL)
Travis Childers (MS)
Parker Griffith (AL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. All from southern or at least bright red "right to work" states
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yup
the "right to work brigade" that still believes that employers (corporations) must be protected at all costs.


:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. bingo!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. And all men, naturally
the Bible belt has far more single mothers trying to raise their family on one woman's paycheck than the rest of the Nation. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. Yeah, I just love living in a right to work state.....NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
28. Not surprised about MS,
there doesn't seem to be much difference between thugs and dems down here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Lily Ledbetter is from Alabama
this whole thing started with a southerner.

One of the three republicans who voted for the bill is from Kentucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. ?
What does that have to do with what I said? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. 250 voted FOR it
and more importantly it passed. Real progress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Including, should it be lost in the subthread above, 95% of Blue Dogs. NT
;jklj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. DUly noted. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. 2009, Isn't that something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. No kidding
I've only spent 75% of my working years getting paid less than my male peers for the same job. I guess I'll be told that I'm "lucky" that it won't be 100%. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Fucking A. Lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. it wasn't luck
It was work. We could be waiting until 2099 if it weren't for Lily Ledbetter herself, who bravely fought to the Supreme Court and continued even after losing there, and if it weren't for the organizations who supported her and politicians like George Miller, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid, and the nearly unanimous dem caucus who voted for the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. The point is that the ERA should have passed ages ago
and spared millions of us the injustice of being paid on the basis of our gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. I find it interesting that there have been a couple of threads about the five dems who voted against
this bill and really no celebration that 250 Dems, almost every dem in the house, voted for it. And that with the new Dem Senate it is almost certain to pass (given it lost by only 3 votes in the senate in the last congress) and a new president, Obama, will sign it. But it's easier around here to be negative about everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Pray tell, why should we be jovial and celebratory about Dems doing
what they're SUPPOSED to do--the right thing?

It's not like this was a difficult choice to make for anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together, and even a smidgen of a heart.

Of *course* there's more attention paid to the "negatives" in this case, as you put it. The ones who voted badly are FAR more remarkable than the ones who voted well. Honestly, would you expect lots of celebration if we passed a bill that officially declared waterboarding to be torture? I mean DUH--it's not like that's a terribly controversial position for a Democrat to take these days. What IS controversial would be a Democrat OPPOSING a law like that--and that would be what people talked about.

Our Dem lawmakers are not dogs; they don't need a treat and praise every time they do something that's obviously correct in order to reinforce the behavior.

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. because it affects people in their real lives
it's acknowledging real progress, and what it took to get there. This was not automatic, people had to do things. I'm sure that many women in Lilly Ledbetter's situation did not fight.

If we only focus on the negatives, it give a distorted picture that progress never happens and when it does it happened by itself. How could it not? Everyone's in favor of equal rights for women, right?

It also gives a distorted picture about the parties. If we only look at the five who voted against it and go from there to bash the DCCC, it ignores the fact that the reason this passed is because the democrats are in control. Recall that John McCain opposed this legislation during the campaign and that the republicans nearly all voted against it.

Which reminds me, what about the three republicans who voted for it? What's up with them? That's good to think about as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
36. I am surprised by your surprise
I am willing to bet those 5 are blue dog democratics in southern leaning states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. Is it true that Don Young was one of the Republicans
who voted in favor? I think I read that somewhere this morning, and I was surprised that he did something right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC